morekaos said:Has there even been an backlash yet? Our Dear leader is more concerned about something that hasn't even happened yet over the 14 permanently dead Americans...disgusting.
Attorney General's 'greatest fear' isn't Islamic terrorism - it's attacks on Muslims because of a backlash in wake of shootings
'We cannot give in to the fear that these backlashes are really based on,' said at a dinner for a Muslim advocate group
Lynch did not mention the shooting in San Bernardino, California, committed by two Muslims and currently under investigation by the FBI
Authorities said yesterday they couldn't be sure the shooting was terrorism, but GOP presidential contenders said it obviously was
AG later said she had observed an 'incredibly disturbing rise of anti-Muslim rhetoric' since ISIS'' assault on Paris and the talk 'edges towards violence'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3346148/Attorney-General-s-greatest-fear-isn-t-Islamic-terrorism-s-attacks-Muslims-backlash-wake-shootings.html
Obama's been making comments like that since day one. He appeals to simple minded people who don't like to think. That speech was an appeal to emotions and an insult to people who have concerns.morekaos said:"Apparently, they are scared of widows and orphans coming into the United States of America," the president said
Turns out we should be
riznick said:Obama's been making comments like that since day one. He appeals to simple minded people who don't like to think. That speech was an appeal to emotions and an insult to people who have concerns.morekaos said:"Apparently, they are scared of widows and orphans coming into the United States of America," the president said
Turns out we should be
It was also used as a stab at republicans. His debate comments were rude and wrong. Don't get me wrong, I'm not happy with the republicans either. In fact, I'm pretty centrist. Obama is a great divider. We need a uniter. As a centrist, I don't want to see polarization. It's pretty much the worst scenario for me. Unfortunately, I can't recommend any other candidates either, so there's not much I can do other than whine...![]()
morekaos said:"Apparently, they are scared of widows and orphans coming into the United States of America," the president said
Turns out we should be
peppy said:This couple was a US citizen and his wife that came in through a K-1 visa. What does this have to do with refugees?
morekaos said:"Apparently, they are scared of widows and orphans coming into the United States of America," the president said
Turns out we should be
Cool... a new nickname... qwerssican.jmoney74 said:Has a messican wife..
eyephone said:Just curious - were you or your family a refugee?
peppy said:This couple was a US citizen and his wife that came in through a K-1 visa. What does this have to do with refugees?
morekaos said:"Apparently, they are scared of widows and orphans coming into the United States of America," the president said
Turns out we should be
morekaos said:eyephone said:Just curious - were you or your family a refugee?
peppy said:This couple was a US citizen and his wife that came in through a K-1 visa. What does this have to do with refugees?
morekaos said:"Apparently, they are scared of widows and orphans coming into the United States of America," the president said
Turns out we should be
My parents legally emigrated from the Phillipines in 1946 after the war. Dad went to NYU and mom went to Harvard. Took them 10 years to earn legal citizenship. All of us 6 kids were born here.
eyephone said:morekaos said:eyephone said:Just curious - were you or your family a refugee?
peppy said:This couple was a US citizen and his wife that came in through a K-1 visa. What does this have to do with refugees?
morekaos said:"Apparently, they are scared of widows and orphans coming into the United States of America," the president said
Turns out we should be
My parents legally emigrated from the Phillipines in 1946 after the war. Dad went to NYU and mom went to Harvard. Took them 10 years to earn legal citizenship. All of us 6 kids were born here.
Good to know Morekas.
I noticed peppy was kind of jumpy regarding refugees, that's why I asked.
Nothing. It has to do with the appeal to emotion with the implication that women or children don't commit crimes. Because the refugees are women and children, you don't have to worry at all about them. It should be very insulting to men.peppy said:What does this have to do with refugees?
riznick said:Nothing. It has to do with the appeal to emotion with the implication that women or children don't commit crimes. Because the refugees are women and children, you don't have to worry at all about them. It should be very insulting to men.peppy said:What does this have to do with refugees?
iacrenter said:riznick said:Nothing. It has to do with the appeal to emotion with the implication that women or children don't commit crimes. Because the refugees are women and children, you don't have to worry at all about them. It should be very insulting to men.peppy said:What does this have to do with refugees?
Having a terrorist attack on US soil is a very big deal. We need to take a hard look at our whole immigration policy, not just refugees. The wife came to the US legally on a visa but the FBI indicates they know very little about her. Are we doing enough to background check people before allowing them into the US?
With regards to Syrian refugees. They deserve a higher level of scrutiny before coming to the US. Especially because many of them are Muslim (i.e. higher risk for being radicalized) and their local proximity to terrorist networks. I don't see the same level of risk when talking about refugees coming from Central America or Cuba.
peppy said:iacrenter said:riznick said:Nothing. It has to do with the appeal to emotion with the implication that women or children don't commit crimes. Because the refugees are women and children, you don't have to worry at all about them. It should be very insulting to men.peppy said:What does this have to do with refugees?
Having a terrorist attack on US soil is a very big deal. We need to take a hard look at our whole immigration policy, not just refugees. The wife came to the US legally on a visa but the FBI indicates they know very little about her. Are we doing enough to background check people before allowing them into the US?
With regards to Syrian refugees. They deserve a higher level of scrutiny before coming to the US. Especially because many of them are Muslim (i.e. higher risk for being radicalized) and their local proximity to terrorist networks. I don't see the same level of risk when talking about refugees coming from Central America or Cuba.
Let me just point our that the previous domestic terrorist attack was committed by a white christian US citizen.
iacrenter said:peppy said:iacrenter said:riznick said:Nothing. It has to do with the appeal to emotion with the implication that women or children don't commit crimes. Because the refugees are women and children, you don't have to worry at all about them. It should be very insulting to men.peppy said:What does this have to do with refugees?
Having a terrorist attack on US soil is a very big deal. We need to take a hard look at our whole immigration policy, not just refugees. The wife came to the US legally on a visa but the FBI indicates they know very little about her. Are we doing enough to background check people before allowing them into the US?
With regards to Syrian refugees. They deserve a higher level of scrutiny before coming to the US. Especially because many of them are Muslim (i.e. higher risk for being radicalized) and their local proximity to terrorist networks. I don't see the same level of risk when talking about refugees coming from Central America or Cuba.
Let me just point our that the previous domestic terrorist attack was committed by a white christian US citizen.
And appropriately so, the FBI has been monitoring domestic paramilitary groups ever since. Immigrants coming from terrorist strongholds should be no different.