morekaos said:There?s a difference between a ribbing and a dog pile.
Irvinecommuter said:morekaos said:There?s a difference between a ribbing and a dog pile.
Snowflakes
Kings said:Irvinecommuter said:morekaos said:There?s a difference between a ribbing and a dog pile.
Snowflakes
fox news = 1 media outlet criticizing obama about a tan suit
cnn, msnbc, wapo, nyt, and on and on = dog pile about trump catering fast food for a fun and lighthearted celebration
if you still don't understand why trump calls the fake news media the enemy of the people, there is no hope for you
Kings said:Irvinecommuter said:morekaos said:There?s a difference between a ribbing and a dog pile.
Snowflakes
fox news = 1 media outlet criticizing obama about a tan suit
cnn, msnbc, wapo, nyt, and on and on = dog pile about trump catering fast food for a fun and lighthearted celebration
if you still don't understand why trump calls the fake news media the enemy of the people, there is no hope for you
Cares said:Kings said:Irvinecommuter said:morekaos said:There?s a difference between a ribbing and a dog pile.
Snowflakes
fox news = 1 media outlet criticizing obama about a tan suit
cnn, msnbc, wapo, nyt, and on and on = dog pile about trump catering fast food for a fun and lighthearted celebration
if you still don't understand why trump calls the fake news media the enemy of the people, there is no hope for you
Yea fake news bad...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fHfgU8oMSo
irvinehomeowner said:Let's get back on topic for Kings and morekaos:
Do you think a government shutdown is good? And why?
Pelosi takes heat for bid to delay State of the Union address
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is facing a mounting backlash from Republicans for urging President Trump to delay his State of the Union address until after the partial government shutdown ends.
Pelosi, D-Calif., in a letter earlier Wednesday, suggested Trump either push back the scheduled Jan. 29 address or submit the speech in writing, citing security concerns amid the lapse in government funding.
But security officials have pushed back on her claim, claiming the teams are prepared. And Republican officials scoffed at the idea -- though the decision ultimately rests with Pelosi.
?It is unbecoming of a speaker to do this,? House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., said Wednesday.
Later, House Minority Whip Steve Scalise, R-La., urged the president to press forward with the speech.
?For Nancy Pelosi to withdraw the offer shows insecurity on their part and that they can?t defend their open borders policy,? Scalise told reporters on Capitol Hill Wednesday. ?The country deserves to hear from the president. ? to think the speaker would lock the doors and prevent people from hearing from the president of the United States.?
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pelosi-takes-heat-for-bid-to-delay-state-of-the-union-address
Kings said:irvinehomeowner said:Let's get back on topic for Kings and morekaos:
Do you think a government shutdown is good? And why?
government shutdown is not good for anyone. i think we can all agree on that. the question is who is being unreasonable? is $5b (0.1% of the budget) for a wall unreasonable? i can understand arguing against this if the wall did absolutely zilch, but the wall will do some number greater than zero in deterring illegal aliens from crossing the border at certain areas, reduce human trafficking, reduce drug trafficking, and so on.
so as i said before, it's not about the money. this is about the democrats having only one chip to play to stop the trump train because rbg is on her way out the door and the economy is humming away.
now tell me, why would good ol' nancy want trump to delay the sotu? is she afraid of what he might say on a national stage? afraid the democrats might be exposed?
irvinehomeowner said:@Kings:
How is the shutdown going to get us $5b? That?s my question.
Irvinecommuter said:Kings said:irvinehomeowner said:Let's get back on topic for Kings and morekaos:
Do you think a government shutdown is good? And why?
government shutdown is not good for anyone. i think we can all agree on that. the question is who is being unreasonable? is $5b (0.1% of the budget) for a wall unreasonable? i can understand arguing against this if the wall did absolutely zilch, but the wall will do some number greater than zero in deterring illegal aliens from crossing the border at certain areas, reduce human trafficking, reduce drug trafficking, and so on.
so as i said before, it's not about the money. this is about the democrats having only one chip to play to stop the trump train because rbg is on her way out the door and the economy is humming away.
now tell me, why would good ol' nancy want trump to delay the sotu? is she afraid of what he might say on a national stage? afraid the democrats might be exposed?
Because the Wall is dumb and the $5 billion is better spent elsewhere if you are worried about those things.
Pelosi is depriving Trump of the attention he craves. Trump already did a "national speech" about the wall and pretty much everyone agreed that he said absolutely nothing material.
Go check those poll numbers on how Trump is doing since the shutdown and who Americans are blaming. Remember Trump said that he would gladly own the shutdown.
Trump knows this and is now forcing federal workers to work without pay.
Kings said:we can all agree that even if the wall was $100m the democrats would never give trump the money because it was one of his top campaign promises to his base.
Kenkoko said:Kings said:we can all agree that even if the wall was $100m the democrats would never give trump the money because it was one of his top campaign promises to his base.
A bad idea is a bad idea. does not matter if it's 100 billion or 100 million.
Now if Trump can get us a FREE wall like he promised, I think most people would go for that.
Kenkoko said:Kings said:we can all agree that even if the wall was $100m the democrats would never give trump the money because it was one of his top campaign promises to his base.
A bad idea is a bad idea. does not matter if it's 100 billion or 100 million.
Now if Trump can get us a FREE wall like he promised, I think most people would go for that.
Irvinecommuter said:Kenkoko said:Kings said:we can all agree that even if the wall was $100m the democrats would never give trump the money because it was one of his top campaign promises to his base.
A bad idea is a bad idea. does not matter if it's 100 billion or 100 million.
Now if Trump can get us a FREE wall like he promised, I think most people would go for that.
Better yet! Mexico was going to pay for it.
The wall is pointless and purely political theater for Trump. He was going to sign the budget without the wall until Anne Coulter and Rush Limbaugh shamed him into shutting down the government.
Kings said:Kenkoko said:Kings said:we can all agree that even if the wall was $100m the democrats would never give trump the money because it was one of his top campaign promises to his base.
A bad idea is a bad idea. does not matter if it's 100 billion or 100 million.
Now if Trump can get us a FREE wall like he promised, I think most people would go for that.
i still haven't heard why it's a "bad idea". bad because it's a waste of money? based on whose opinion? we have spent countless dollars over the years on things that we thought were "good ideas" based on bipartisan opinion that turned out to be "bad ideas".
Kings said:Irvinecommuter said:Kenkoko said:Kings said:we can all agree that even if the wall was $100m the democrats would never give trump the money because it was one of his top campaign promises to his base.
A bad idea is a bad idea. does not matter if it's 100 billion or 100 million.
Now if Trump can get us a FREE wall like he promised, I think most people would go for that.
Better yet! Mexico was going to pay for it.
The wall is pointless and purely political theater for Trump. He was going to sign the budget without the wall until Anne Coulter and Rush Limbaugh shamed him into shutting down the government.
yes, ann coulter and rush limbaugh are running the country :
i thought it was putin?