Masks?

As I said before. It is the end of being nice. You can see it in videos that random people are confronting people with out masks at public places. Not only you are endangering the person near my. You are also endangering their family.
Survival of the fittest! You want people to be nice, but you want to potentially harm people without a mask. You can?t have it both ways!

(Note: the post is for entertainment purposes but based on stories in the news. I am not endorsing violence)
 
Look what happened at Dodger stadium. There was a group that closed down by protesting which halted the vaccination process. Is that being nice to people waiting to get vaccinated? (Maybe they were old or health workers waiting to get vaccinated)  If they were old, they could of been exposed by the protestors. Idk)
 
eyephone said:
As I said before. It is the end of being nice. You can see it in videos that random people are confronting people with out masks at public places. Not only you are endangering the person near my. You are also endangering their family.
Survival of the fittest! You want people to be nice, but you want to potentially harm people without a mask. You can?t have it both ways!

(Note: the post is for entertainment purposes but based on stories in the news. I am not endorsing violence)
Click to expand...

I think you are using survival of the fittest incorrectly. Survival of the fittest would throw out masks and let ride. Those who die, die. The best genes survive.
 
qwerty said:
eyephone said:
As I said before. It is the end of being nice. You can see it in videos that random people are confronting people with out masks at public places. Not only you are endangering the person near my. You are also endangering their family.
Survival of the fittest! You want people to be nice, but you want to potentially harm people without a mask. You can?t have it both ways!

(Note: the post is for entertainment purposes but based on stories in the news. I am not endorsing violence)
Click to expand...

I think you are using survival of the fittest incorrectly. Survival of the fittest would throw out masks and let ride. Those who die, die. The best genes survive.
Click to expand...

Or... the ones with the science based genes survive because they know how to avoid dangerous viruses by practicing safety protocols.

Maybe a guy with a the biggest calves can jump off a cliff and survive. But the guy who knows jumping off a cliff has a low chance of survival doesn't do it and for sure survives.

So it could also be "survival of the smartest". :)
 
irvinehomeowner said:
qwerty said:
eyephone said:
As I said before. It is the end of being nice. You can see it in videos that random people are confronting people with out masks at public places. Not only you are endangering the person near my. You are also endangering their family.
Survival of the fittest! You want people to be nice, but you want to potentially harm people without a mask. You can?t have it both ways!

(Note: the post is for entertainment purposes but based on stories in the news. I am not endorsing violence)
Click to expand...

I think you are using survival of the fittest incorrectly. Survival of the fittest would throw out masks and let ride. Those who die, die. The best genes survive.
Click to expand...

Or... the ones with the science based genes survive because they know how to avoid dangerous viruses by practicing safety protocols.

Maybe a guy with a the biggest calves can jump off a cliff and survive. But the guy who knows jumping off a cliff has a low chance of survival doesn't do it and for sure survives.

So it could also be "survival of the smartest". :)
Click to expand...

True that.
 
No he wasn't.

Keyes, who coached at Pembroke Academy for the last four years, said the school requires student athletes to wear masks at athletic events, something he doesn't completely agree with.
Click to expand...


morekaos said:
Fear will keep the local systems in line....fear of cancellation!!

High school track coach is fired for violating mask mandate when he allowed students to run OUTSIDE without face coverings

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9445517/New-Hampshire-track-coach-fired-violating-high-schools-mask-mandate.html
https://youtu.be/YnNSnJbjdws
Click to expand...
 
Guess what they find when they actually start testing the high school sport meets?

Yes, they do cause community spread.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2021/04/06/youth-sports-outbreaks-covid-testing/

Dan Culhane, 62, took extraordinary precautions when he returned to the ice as a youth hockey referee in January. He triple-masked, wore a plexiglass face shield on his helmet and donned his gear at home to minimize time indoors.

It wasn?t enough.

Culhane, who died on Feb. 28 of covid-19, is one of more than 189 people confirmed or suspected to be linked to an unusual youth sports outbreak of the coronavirus in Carver County, Minn., driven by the B.1.1.7 variant that was first seen in the United Kingdom. The interlinked cases span all levels of K-12 schools, from elementary to high school, and 18 hockey, four basketball, three lacrosse and one soccer teams.

?Until now we haven?t seen transmission like this in kids in the pandemic,? said Michael Osterholm, an infectious-disease specialist at the University of Minnesota who served as an adviser to President Biden.
Click to expand...

 
That?s why schools became exempt from testing their athletes once an area reached red. Easier to manage when you don?t have to manage.
 
Not in my house, we wear masks. The schools on the other hand are lacking the ability or desire to enforce mask wearing. It should be as simple as suspended from sports activity or switched to online instruction.
 
freedomcm said:
Why is it so difficult for you to understand levels of evidence?

Fauci said it was 'likely' to be more efficacious to double up.

Fauci said the data is not definitive (ie not rigorously proven).

Makes perfect sense to anyone not a conspiracy winger
Click to expand...

Or...it really was all for naught...

Was mask-wearing pointless after all? Fauci must be forced to answer

Did we ever need masks?

It?s a touchy, complex question. People may not want to learn that millions of us covered our faces for 15 months for no good reason after all. But asking the questions is exactly what we must do.

Last week, a trove of Dr. Anthony Fauci?s emails were released to the public. In a Feb. 5, 2020, email to a Team Obama health official, the ?virus guru wrote that masks were for infected people, and that ?the typical mask you buy in a drug store is not really effective in keeping out the virus, which is small enough to pass through the material.?

Fauci now claims that new information emerged in the time since that email proving the efficacy of masks. But did it? What was that new information?

Did the virus magically grow in size, so that the masks could contain it? When he referred to masks in the drug store at that point, he meant medical masks. But most Americans spent more than a year wearing cloth masks. If medical masks couldn?t contain the tiny ?virus, how could the cloth ones? Can Fauci point to any studies showing that masks made a significant difference in containing the coronavirus?

https://nypost.com/2021/06/06/was-mask-wearing-pointless-after-all-fauci-must-answer/
 
morekaos said:
freedomcm said:
Why is it so difficult for you to understand levels of evidence?

Fauci said it was 'likely' to be more efficacious to double up.

Fauci said the data is not definitive (ie not rigorously proven).

Makes perfect sense to anyone not a conspiracy winger
Click to expand...

Or...it really was all for naught...

Was mask-wearing pointless after all? Fauci must be forced to answer

Did we ever need masks?

It?s a touchy, complex question. People may not want to learn that millions of us covered our faces for 15 months for no good reason after all. But asking the questions is exactly what we must do.

Last week, a trove of Dr. Anthony Fauci?s emails were released to the public. In a Feb. 5, 2020, email to a Team Obama health official, the ?virus guru wrote that masks were for infected people, and that ?the typical mask you buy in a drug store is not really effective in keeping out the virus, which is small enough to pass through the material.?

Fauci now claims that new information emerged in the time since that email proving the efficacy of masks. But did it? What was that new information?

Did the virus magically grow in size, so that the masks could contain it? When he referred to masks in the drug store at that point, he meant medical masks. But most Americans spent more than a year wearing cloth masks. If medical masks couldn?t contain the tiny ?virus, how could the cloth ones? Can Fauci point to any studies showing that masks made a significant difference in containing the coronavirus?

https://nypost.com/2021/06/06/was-mask-wearing-pointless-after-all-fauci-must-answer/
Click to expand...

Fox News crap.
 
Stop shooting the messenger when you don't like the message...How about VOX?  That's good and lefty liberal, right?....same message same point!!

California mandated masks. Florida opened its restaurants. Did any of it matter?

After a year of debates over mask mandates, lockdowns, and school closures, that mixed evidence might suggest a certain fatalism: Did none of these state policies really matter? Or was the virus going to spread no matter what states did? Was it all for nothing?

https://www.vox.com/coronavirus-covid19/22456544/covid-19-mask-mandates-lockdown-debate-evidence

Like I said from the start..."Virus gonna virus."
 
Influenza was lower in 2020 due to all the mask wearing
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6937a6.htm
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/a-sharp-drop-in-flu-cases-during-covid-19-pandemic/


To say that masks do not help during a respitory event is to rile up the retards who make money off of politicizing mask wearing. 
This is trumps fault and one major reason he lost 2020.


Mask deniers are sheep.  A bit of critical thinking would help them but all they can do is baaAAAAAAAAaaaah....
 
It seems masks do help. I think the issue that gets mixed up is how contagious the truly airborne virus is.

The mask come in handy when taking to people within a close distance. My kids spit on me all the time when they talk. So the masks would definitely help in preventing saliva transfer from talking to someone at close distance, perhaps 3 feet or less??

Where masks are probably less helpful are with the airborne particles which now the CDC says can cause an infection. While entirely possible they can cause infection, it seems the probability of these infections is low because masks wouldn?t really help in these situations. So while headlines claiming covid is transmissible  by just floating in the air create clicks, it doesnt seem like they cause a whole lot of infections otherwise we all would have had it by now if a floating virus really caused infections.
 
I was by this random mo fo that took off his mask and sneezed. (I was 15 feet away)
It ruined my mood to shop and I left.
Unbelievable shi7

 
morekaos said:
Stop shooting the messenger when you don't like the message...How about VOX?  That's good and lefty liberal, right?....same message same point!!

California mandated masks. Florida opened its restaurants. Did any of it matter?

After a year of debates over mask mandates, lockdowns, and school closures, that mixed evidence might suggest a certain fatalism: Did none of these state policies really matter? Or was the virus going to spread no matter what states did? Was it all for nothing?

https://www.vox.com/coronavirus-covid19/22456544/covid-19-mask-mandates-lockdown-debate-evidence

Like I said from the start..."Virus gonna virus."
Click to expand...

Misinformation Morkeas
 
eyephone said:
morekaos said:
Stop shooting the messenger when you don't like the message...How about VOX?  That's good and lefty liberal, right?....same message same point!!

California mandated masks. Florida opened its restaurants. Did any of it matter?

After a year of debates over mask mandates, lockdowns, and school closures, that mixed evidence might suggest a certain fatalism: Did none of these state policies really matter? Or was the virus going to spread no matter what states did? Was it all for nothing?

https://www.vox.com/coronavirus-covid19/22456544/covid-19-mask-mandates-lockdown-debate-evidence

Like I said from the start..."Virus gonna virus."
Click to expand...

Misinformation Morkeas
Click to expand...

But it was written by Vox..so it must be true.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top