Innosint said:the announcement yesterday afternoon then the second one later at night.....
what a fucking joke.
We basically have the OC board overruling the OC health.
In half a year, we will probably start reading about the OC board blaming OC Health moving too slowly during the outbreak and caused unnecessary infection.
nosuchreality said:Serious question for people. What are the public's WTF numbers for deaths from Covid-19?
What is the high number that makes people say didn't do enough?
What is the low number that makes people say, why did we do everything?
Yes, I realize the effort is to bend the curve, but how many deaths are curve bending success versus WTF?
Mety said:eyephone said:@Mety - coronavirus is more lethal than the flu statistically especially for older people according to the article. The stats for coronavirus provided by Journal of the American Medical Association in the article.
https://voiceofoc.org/2020/03/fielder-oc-supervisors-spread-falsehoods-about-covid-19-risks/
We all know it's more lethal for people over 65. However, ANY disease is more lethal for elders not just Covid-19. So it's not really a WOW factor for me personally.*
Interesting thing is it's not effecting children as much. 0% for children under 9 according to the data Panda provided.
*Just staying on this side to counter what the most people believe.
eyephone said:Mety said:eyephone said:@Mety - coronavirus is more lethal than the flu statistically especially for older people according to the article. The stats for coronavirus provided by Journal of the American Medical Association in the article.
https://voiceofoc.org/2020/03/fielder-oc-supervisors-spread-falsehoods-about-covid-19-risks/
We all know it's more lethal for people over 65. However, ANY disease is more lethal for elders not just Covid-19. So it's not really a WOW factor for me personally.*
Interesting thing is it's not effecting children as much. 0% for children under 9 according to the data Panda provided.
*Just staying on this side to counter what the most people believe.
If it is more lethal then why are you comparing to N1.
The number of people that get bitten by a rattle snake is lower than H1N1. But if you use the stats H1 is greater. But we all know without treatment a rattle snake bite is more deadlier.
That is where you and others argument is flawed and wrong.
lnc said:There?s this malaria drug call Plaquenil (hydroxychloroquine) and it just might work against COVID19.
There are large trials in Korea, China, and France, and it is already part of the Belgian COVID treatment guidelines. It was tried 17 years ago during the SARS epidemic and was working, but when that epidemic died out people stopped looking at it.
Right now there is an ongoing 3000 patient study in France where people with close contact with COVID positive individuals like family members are being treated with Plaquenil or usual care (isolation, etc). The belief is that 75% of the people (or more) treated with Plaquenil will not convert to virus positivity, since in a small trial of 24 people infected with virus, 75% of them had no virus detectable one week after treatment. This follow-up study should announce in 2-3 weeks. Plaquenil sounds very promising, hope it really works. And best part is that it is very inexpensive.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/marybe...coronavirus--it-might-just-work/#c899305c4980
morekaos said:Its not deadlier than H1N1. "10 times the flu mortality" for Corona is 1% mortality. (the wording makes for a nice headline) H1N1 was around 4%, was infecting and killing children and no one panicked about that.
Mety said:eyephone said:Mety said:eyephone said:@Mety - coronavirus is more lethal than the flu statistically especially for older people according to the article. The stats for coronavirus provided by Journal of the American Medical Association in the article.
https://voiceofoc.org/2020/03/fielder-oc-supervisors-spread-falsehoods-about-covid-19-risks/
We all know it's more lethal for people over 65. However, ANY disease is more lethal for elders not just Covid-19. So it's not really a WOW factor for me personally.*
Interesting thing is it's not effecting children as much. 0% for children under 9 according to the data Panda provided.
*Just staying on this side to counter what the most people believe.
If it is more lethal then why are you comparing to N1.
The number of people that get bitten by a rattle snake is lower than H1N1. But if you use the stats H1 is greater. But we all know without treatment a rattle snake bite is more deadlier.
That is where you and others argument is flawed and wrong.
Haha. I think rattle snake bite without treatment is much more dangerous than Covid-19 and H1N1 combined.
It's not just the numbers we're comparing but the whole situation around. H1N1 killed half million people worldwide. To me, that's huge. But what I find interesting is that when that happened, no one was hoarding or being lockdown and stuff. Not much media attention was going on like how it's happening now.
We're not saying Covid-19 is fake. Just seeing how people react different in different times is interesting to me at least.
nosuchreality said:Serious question for people. What are the public's WTF numbers for deaths from Covid-19?
What is the high number that makes people say didn't do enough?
What is the low number that makes people say, why did we do everything?
Yes, I realize the effort is to bend the curve, but how many deaths are curve bending success versus WTF?
Kenkoko said:nosuchreality said:Serious question for people. What are the public's WTF numbers for deaths from Covid-19?
What is the high number that makes people say didn't do enough?
What is the low number that makes people say, why did we do everything?
Yes, I realize the effort is to bend the curve, but how many deaths are curve bending success versus WTF?
Unfortunately, I am already of the opinion that we didn?t do enough. I don?t think there is a low public number that would change my mind.
While I think Trump and the federal government handled this poorly, I don?t put all the blame on them. This is institutional and societal failure from top to bottom. We are just woefully unprepared for a pandemic as a country.
Comparing us to Taiwan (where I am from), they had federal funding and planning long before COVID-19. Predetermined measures were put in place very quickly in Taiwan while we have a deadlocked central government that can?t get anything meaningful done.
Locally, cities in Taiwan have been routinely drilling for emergencies and have large public awareness education campaigns for years. The only drills we have is active shooter drills in school. Public health education, social pressure, and even just insane amount of infographic for dummies posted everywhere about the benefits of social distancing has allow them to achieve massive societal buy-ins to bend the curve. Even if you don?t care about everyone wearing masks here, it?s nice to not have people irrationally hoarding toilet paper and supplies.
Taiwan currently have 75 cases and 1 death despite being so close to China. They did it without instituting a lockdown which is impressive. And will probably recover much quicker and suffer less economic destruction compared to us. We are stuck praying we don?t end up like Italy. We are very likely looking at months of disruption in our lives and will face a deep recession.
Sorry didn?t completely answer your question but I will be happy if this ends with 0 deaths among my friends/family/coworkers/TI members
irvinehomeowner said:lnc said:There?s this malaria drug call Plaquenil (hydroxychloroquine) and it just might work against COVID19.
There are large trials in Korea, China, and France, and it is already part of the Belgian COVID treatment guidelines. It was tried 17 years ago during the SARS epidemic and was working, but when that epidemic died out people stopped looking at it.
Right now there is an ongoing 3000 patient study in France where people with close contact with COVID positive individuals like family members are being treated with Plaquenil or usual care (isolation, etc). The belief is that 75% of the people (or more) treated with Plaquenil will not convert to virus positivity, since in a small trial of 24 people infected with virus, 75% of them had no virus detectable one week after treatment. This follow-up study should announce in 2-3 weeks. Plaquenil sounds very promising, hope it really works. And best part is that it is very inexpensive.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/marybe...coronavirus--it-might-just-work/#c899305c4980
I hope this isn't like Forsythia*.
*will someone get this?