bkshopr_IHB
New member
Gimme gimme gimme 3CWG on the last plan.
SoCal78 said:OMG. Thank you, Deuce!! Thanks for going to the trouble of locating & posting them all. You are the best.
SoCal78 said:I went to The Inside Tract to find out who the builder is, like I normally do... only to find out they have now changed their site and apparently I can't view it without a subscription. Drats! BK -- by any chance, do you know who the builder is for Sedona in Tustin Ranch? Or, Deuce, does it say anywhere on the info you got for the floor plans? Thanks.
IrvineRealtor said:The 3CWG should be a dead giveaway. Kaufman & Broad (KB Homes)
IrvineRealtor said:Was updating the "Turtles" and thought I could add just a bit more for everyone. (TRidge is now complete, and I'm really liking the TRock artistry - many are quite obviously hand-drawn)
-IR2
SoCal78 said:I went to The Inside Tract to find out who the builder is, like I normally do... only to find out they have now changed their site and apparently I can't view it without a subscription. Drats! BK -- by any chance, do you know who the builder is for Sedona in Tustin Ranch? Or, Deuce, does it say anywhere on the info you got for the floor plans? Thanks.
SoCal78 said:Bk - would it be possible to buy a lower quality home and bring it up to par? For example, the last home I owned, was by all accounts, a subpar product. (I do not know who the builder was.) One thing it had was extremely cheap siding that was composed of a type of low grade particle board. It suffered moisture issues whereas it swelled with water and it lead to other problems. What we did is replace the siding with better quality. It is an expense but done easily enough. However, this is on the exterior. Would there be too many inefficiencies in a KB / Lewis / similar home that would be impossible or difficult to fix to make the house adequate?
bkshopr said:SoCal78 said:Bk - would it be possible to buy a lower quality home and bring it up to par? For example, the last home I owned, was by all accounts, a subpar product. (I do not know who the builder was.) One thing it had was extremely cheap siding that was composed of a type of low grade particle board. It suffered moisture issues whereas it swelled with water and it lead to other problems. What we did is replace the siding with better quality. It is an expense but done easily enough. However, this is on the exterior. Would there be too many inefficiencies in a KB / Lewis / similar home that would be impossible or difficult to fix to make the house adequate?
You can dip a rotten strawberry in chocolate or marinade expired chicken from the grocers freezer. It may look good but still taste bad.
Truly amazing structure is the bone and waterproofing. Cosmetic is only a cover up.
#1 mistake for a consumers is to think the quality of a home is based on finishes. All builders know that and they know how to cut the bones to pay for the skin. The only way to know is to purchase a home with help from someone with construction experience.
qwerty said:Isnt all new home construction not up to par these days? The builders who are public have a tremendous amount of pressure on earnings so it makes sense that they cut corners. I guess if you buy a new home you just hope it holds up till you pass it along to the next sucker.
SoCal78 said:qwerty said:Isnt all new home construction not up to par these days? The builders who are public have a tremendous amount of pressure on earnings so it makes sense that they cut corners. I guess if you buy a new home you just hope it holds up till you pass it along to the next sucker.
Yeah, I'm sort of wondering the same thing... these days, aren't they all of modest quality? Does any builder ever let the foundation cure properly before framing? If we buy in a flatter part of the city that is not in a liquefaction zone or cut and fill pad on a slope, are chances on our side that we could be ok structurally for 15-20 years until we flip to the next sucker? ;-) (Sorry, I don't mean to give you need for Tylenol today, Bk.)
SoCal78 said:qwerty said:Isnt all new home construction not up to par these days? The builders who are public have a tremendous amount of pressure on earnings so it makes sense that they cut corners. I guess if you buy a new home you just hope it holds up till you pass it along to the next sucker.
Yeah, I'm sort of wondering the same thing... these days, aren't they all of modest quality? Does any builder ever let the foundation cure properly before framing? If we buy in a flatter part of the city that is not in a liquefaction zone or cut and fill pad on a slope, are chances on our side that we could be ok structurally for 15-20 years until we flip to the next sucker? ;-) (Sorry, I don't mean to give you need for Tylenol today, Bk.)