Stern should have rejected that trade too since it wasn't balanced.Liar Loan said:Is possible to trade your Sixth Man of the Year for a mid-level exception and a first round draft pick?
irvinehomeowner said:Clips got Stern-blocked too.
I think it's ridiculous how the NBA is controlling the Hornets.
I think the difference (although that doesn't make it right) is that the NBA isn't an owner of the teams involved.USCTrojanCPA said:Stern should have rejected that trade too since it wasn't balanced.Liar Loan said:Is possible to trade your Sixth Man of the Year for a mid-level exception and a first round draft pick?
Neil Olshey, the Clippers' vice president of basketball operations, didn't speak much about the Paul issue.
"Clearly, a player of Chris Paul's caliber ? if you pick up the phone, you're going to have to listen to what somebody has to say," he said. "We're not actively making phone calls trying to acquire any new players at this point."
Olshey is upbeat because he likes their current roster. That includes the team's decision to bring back restricted free-agent center DeAndre Jordan by matching the offer Jordan got from Golden State, worth $42.3 million over four years.
The Clippers also won the waiver auction Monday for Chauncey Billups, a veteran point guard who has won big games and is known to have a positive presence in the locker room.
Billups, 35, was waived by the Knicks under the NBA's new amnesty provision. The Clippers won the bidding process by offering a little more than $2 million.
The Clippers said Billups will be at practice Wednesday. The Clippers can't trade him, so he'll be with the team unless he gets waived this season.
With Griffin, Mo Williams, Randy Foye, free-agent acquisition Caron Butler and the rest of the team, Olshey feels good about their prospects.
"We think that we've got a product on the floor right now that's given a lot of people in the Western Conference pause," he said. "We've got a lot of depth. We've got quality veterans. We've got really good young players."
Liar Loan said:So did the Hornets enhance their value with this deal? Are these three players better than the three they would have gotten from the Rockets/Lakers? I can't wait to hear the sports analysts dissect this and David Stern defend it.
Yep... it actually makes a little more sense in this light. The NBA wanted the Hornets not to have a better team now... but a team with more potential so that a new owner can come in and rebuild it... kind of like move-in ready but will break down in a year or two... or scratch where you can make it your own.qwerty said:they clearly did not get better, but i think from a sellers perspective it is defensible. you get a star in his rookie contract for a couple more years, you get likely a top 3 pick from the Twolves, which will be another cheap peace for 5 years. and you free up salary cap room with the expiring contract of kaman. it kind of give the hornets a cleaner/cheaper balance sheet and a cleaner slate for the new owner to come in. but in terms of winning now, this clearly is not the better trade.
irvinehomeowner said:My suggestions:
1. Replace FTM with FT% (if you have to include something FT related)... or just remove any FT stat.
2. Replace C with another Util. Productive centers are actually hard to slot in and you end up looking for a low tier one just to get that position filled.
3. Since we have so few teams, you might want to add another bench position to make our rosters bigger (or another Util for MORE stats!).