Market Update

[quote author="RoLar_USC" date=1253418448][quote author="no_vaseline" date=1253402467]That was solid. Now if we can get him to use the little <a> button to make URL's clickable.........</blockquote>


Only for links to my blog</blockquote>


That's not funny or cool.
 
[quote author="stepping_up" date=1253226313][quote author="NewportSkipper" date=1253155511]Are you kidding me? Needling about <span style="color: red;">grammer </span>is worse than calling someone a doormat?</blockquote>


Am I the only one who sees the irony here?</blockquote>


No. Apparently he needles about <strong>grammar </strong>but not spelling.
 
[quote author="no_vaseline" date=1253420848][quote author="RoLar_USC" date=1253418448][quote author="no_vaseline" date=1253402467]That was solid. Now if we can get him to use the little <a> button to make URL's clickable.........</blockquote>


Only for links to my blog</blockquote>


That's not funny or cool.</blockquote>


I completely disagree: It is funny, when you stop to consider his blog.
 
[quote author="no_vaseline" date=1253420848][quote author="RoLar_USC" date=1253418448][quote author="no_vaseline" date=1253402467]That was solid. Now if we can get him to use the little <a> button to make URL's clickable.........</blockquote>


Only for links to my blog</blockquote>


That's not funny or cool.</blockquote>


Haha, I was just joking.
 
[quote author="no_vaseline" date=1253420848][quote author="RoLar_USC" date=1253418448][quote author="no_vaseline" date=1253402467]That was solid. Now if we can get him to use the little <a> button to make URL's clickable.........</blockquote>


Only for links to my blog</blockquote>


That's not funny or cool.</blockquote>
I think it is funny.
 
[quote author="awgee" date=1253427944][quote author="no_vaseline" date=1253420848][quote author="RoLar_USC" date=1253418448][quote author="no_vaseline" date=1253402467]That was solid. Now if we can get him to use the little <a> button to make URL's clickable.........</blockquote>


Only for links to my blog</blockquote>


That's not funny or cool.</blockquote>
I think it is funny.</blockquote>


I laughed.
 
<strong>Market Update</strong>

<a href="http://occoastalnews.com/?p=743"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-711" title="Combo" src="http://occoastalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/09-21-09.jpg" alt="Combo" width="800" height="449" /></a>

<a href="http://occoastalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/09-21-09.jpg">[Enlarge]</a>



No sign of a slowdown yet...
 
[quote author="RoLar_USC" date=1253856592]<strong>Market Update</strong>

<a href="http://occoastalnews.com/?p=743"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-711" title="Combo" src="http://occoastalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/09-21-09.jpg" alt="Combo" width="800" height="449" /></a>

<a href="http://occoastalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/09-21-09.jpg">[Enlarge]</a>



No sign of a slowdown yet...</blockquote>
RoLar, why do you use this Active vs. Pending listings? You do realize that all short sales that have submitted offers go into the "pending" category, correct? Besides the fact that these short sales will hang out in the "pending" status for months and months, the majority of them never close and get foreclosed on. So if you want to make the data more accurate, I would exclude short sale listings from the "pending" category. Just a thought. Then you also have to consider that you will get about 10% of non-short sale listings going from "pending" back to "active" status due to various reasons. I rarely like using "back-up" and/or "pending" listings to derive an opinion on the health of the real estate market.
 
[quote author="CougBear" date=1253924156]RoLo... the closed # that you list every 4 months or so, is that per month or over that 4 month duration?</blockquote>


I added the closed listing numbers before every four weeks for the total number of closed escrows that month.
 
[quote author="USCTrojanCPA" date=1253937066][quote author="RoLar_USC" date=1253856592]<strong>Market Update</strong>

<a href="http://occoastalnews.com/?p=743"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-711" title="Combo" src="http://occoastalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/09-21-09.jpg" alt="Combo" width="800" height="449" /></a>

<a href="http://occoastalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/09-21-09.jpg">[Enlarge]</a>



No sign of a slowdown yet...</blockquote>
RoLar, why do you use this Active vs. Pending listings? <strong>You do realize that all short sales that have submitted offers go into the "pending" category, correct?</strong> Besides the fact that these short sales will hang out in the "pending" status for months and months, <strong>the majority of them never close and get foreclosed on</strong>. So if you want to make the data more accurate, I would exclude short sale listings from the "pending" category. Just a thought. Then you also have to consider that you will get about 10% of non-short sale listings going from "pending" back to "active" status due to various reasons. I rarely like using "back-up" and/or "pending" listings to derive an opinion on the health of the real estate market.</blockquote>


Excluding the short sales from the pending (in escrow) category would most definitely not make the data more accurate. In an area where 40-50% properties are listed as short sales, you would be ignoring a large number of sales. If you take short sales out of the pending category, the only way to make the data still somewhat meaningfull would be to also take short sales out of the actives. I listed the closed sales numbers previously as requested but didn't get any sort of response.



Again I'll use Aliso Viejo as an example and take short sales out of both sides.



Total number of active non-short sale listings: 50



Total number of non-short sale properties in escrow: 75



So that method gives 150%... Still impressive.



"all short sales that have submitted offers go into the "pending" category" - Completely untrue. Call ten short sales listed in an active city, and ask if they have any offers submitted. I bet at least 6 of the 10 reply that they do. A frequent practice is for the listing agent to place the listing on "Hold Do Not Show" after the property has received offers and submitted them to the bank. Maybe you meant accepted offers. Yes, short sales do take a long time to close escrow, but they also take a long time to go into escrow.



"the majority of them never close and get foreclosed on" - Now I'm not sure how to find the most accurate support for this argument but I'll do my best. If a short sale does not sell and is foreclosed on, then the listing agent must place it in one of the following categories: Expired, Cancelled, or Withdrawn. In August, 2009 there were 19 closed escrows. During that same time, there were only 8 properties that fell into one of those three categories. Still a high percentage, but not the majority.



In escrow statistics are the newest source of data in real estate. Closed sales numbers are also relevant, and I'll start including at the end of each month, but they represent a 30-60 day delay.
 
[quote author="no_vaseline" date=1253968564]What is the % of SS listed vs SS closed? How does it change from month to month?</blockquote>


I can't really tell how the number of SS listings in the area have progress because I haven't been recording the numbers but the closed sales have been relatively meaningless the last 9 months, maybe a little increase but it seems too sparactic to come to any conclusions.



January: 15

February: 11

March: 13

April: 11

May: 17

June: 28

July: 16

August: 19

September up to today: 11



Currently Listed: 49
 
[quote author="RoLar_USC" date=1253961037][quote author="USCTrojanCPA" date=1253937066][quote author="RoLar_USC" date=1253856592]<strong>Market Update</strong>

<a href="http://occoastalnews.com/?p=743"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-711" title="Combo" src="http://occoastalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/09-21-09.jpg" alt="Combo" width="800" height="449" /></a>

<a href="http://occoastalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/09-21-09.jpg">[Enlarge]</a>



No sign of a slowdown yet...</blockquote>
RoLar, why do you use this Active vs. Pending listings? <strong>You do realize that all short sales that have submitted offers go into the "pending" category, correct?</strong> Besides the fact that these short sales will hang out in the "pending" status for months and months, <strong>the majority of them never close and get foreclosed on</strong>. So if you want to make the data more accurate, I would exclude short sale listings from the "pending" category. Just a thought. Then you also have to consider that you will get about 10% of non-short sale listings going from "pending" back to "active" status due to various reasons. I rarely like using "back-up" and/or "pending" listings to derive an opinion on the health of the real estate market.</blockquote>


Excluding the short sales from the pending (in escrow) category would most definitely not make the data more accurate. In an area where 40-50% properties are listed as short sales, you would be ignoring a large number of sales. <strong>If you take short sales out of the pending category, the only way to make the data still somewhat meaningfull would be to also take short sales out of the actives.</strong> I listed the closed sales numbers previously as requested but didn't get any sort of response.

</blockquote>


Rolo, I know you already get a lot of slack on this board. However, from a scientific method perspective, you cannot take data and MAKE it significant or

"meaningful" as you said above. The entire point of looking at data is to see if there actually IS a trend or a something that has statistical significance. The easiest way to ruin a study is to manipulate the data to meet your own hypothesis. I'm not going to fully accuse you of this, but you seem to be walking a very fine line in that regard. It is entirely possible that the method you are using to generate your results is flawed due to the obscured nature of short sales. If short sales and organic sales are truly different in nature, putting them in the same data pool, could lead to incorrect results. The GIGO method, if you will.

My 2 cents, but what would I know...??
 
[quote author="CougBear" date=1254036615][quote author="RoLar_USC" date=1253961037][quote author="USCTrojanCPA" date=1253937066][quote author="RoLar_USC" date=1253856592]<strong>Market Update</strong>

<a href="http://occoastalnews.com/?p=743"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-711" title="Combo" src="http://occoastalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/09-21-09.jpg" alt="Combo" width="800" height="449" /></a>

<a href="http://occoastalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/09-21-09.jpg">[Enlarge]</a>



No sign of a slowdown yet...</blockquote>
RoLar, why do you use this Active vs. Pending listings? <strong>You do realize that all short sales that have submitted offers go into the "pending" category, correct?</strong> Besides the fact that these short sales will hang out in the "pending" status for months and months, <strong>the majority of them never close and get foreclosed on</strong>. So if you want to make the data more accurate, I would exclude short sale listings from the "pending" category. Just a thought. Then you also have to consider that you will get about 10% of non-short sale listings going from "pending" back to "active" status due to various reasons. I rarely like using "back-up" and/or "pending" listings to derive an opinion on the health of the real estate market.</blockquote>


Excluding the short sales from the pending (in escrow) category would most definitely not make the data more accurate. In an area where 40-50% properties are listed as short sales, you would be ignoring a large number of sales. <strong>If you take short sales out of the pending category, the only way to make the data still somewhat meaningfull would be to also take short sales out of the actives.</strong> I listed the closed sales numbers previously as requested but didn't get any sort of response.

</blockquote>


Rolo, I know you already get a lot of slack on this board. However, from a scientific method perspective, you cannot take data and MAKE it significant or

"meaningful" as you said above. The entire point of looking at data is to see if there actually IS a trend or a something that has statistical significance. The easiest way to ruin a study is to manipulate the data to meet your own hypothesis. I'm not going to fully accuse you of this, but you seem to be walking a very fine line in that regard. It is entirely possible that the method you are using to generate your results is flawed due to the obscured nature of short sales. If short sales and organic sales are truly different in nature, putting them in the same data pool, could lead to incorrect results. The GIGO method, if you will.

My 2 cents, but what would I know...??</blockquote>


I was just saying that you can't take the short sales out of the in escrows without taking them out of the active listings as well. How am I manipulating anything? I was doing the exact opposite of that by not leaving out information as suggested. Method to generate my results? I'm posting data. I even took short sales out of the equation and it left a 150% Active v. In Escrow ratio for Aliso Viejo. Please explain how the data is "manipulated" and I will correct.
 
Robert, help me understand your numbers. If I'm looking at Laguna beach, today on Redfin, I see 480 properties listed. I see 52 under contract. Would your columns today (if using Redfin) be pending 52 active 428? Or would it be pending 52 and active 480?



Similarly, for Irvine, on Redfin I see 310 under contract. (I'm counting that as pending) I see 571 that are not under contract. Would your sheet show pending 310 and active 571 with a percentage of 54.3%?



It looks like you are showing under contract/not under contract as pending/active. Is that correct?
 
[quote author="No_Such_Reality" date=1254131678]Robert, help me understand your numbers. If I'm looking at Laguna beach, today on Redfin, I see 480 properties listed. I see 52 under contract. Would your columns today (if using Redfin) be pending 52 active 428? Or would it be pending 52 and active 480?



Similarly, for Irvine, on Redfin I see 310 under contract. (I'm counting that as pending) I see 571 that are not under contract. Would your sheet show pending 310 and active 571 with a percentage of 54.3%?



It looks like you are showing under contract/not under contract as pending/active. Is that correct?</blockquote>


Pending 52, Active 480. I'm not subtracting the pendings from the actives.
 
<strong>Market Update 9/28/2009</strong>

<a href="http://occoastalnews.com/?p=750"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-711" title="Combo" src="http://occoastalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/09-28-09.jpg" alt="Combo" width="800" height="449" /></a>

<a href="http://occoastalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/09-28-09.jpg">[Enlarge]</a>
 
<strong>Market Update 9/28/2009</strong>

<a href="http://occoastalnews.com/?p=757"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-711" title="Combo" src="http://occoastalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/10-12-2009.jpg" alt="Combo" width="800" height="449" /></a>

<a href="http://occoastalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/10-12-2009.jpg">[Enlarge]</a>



<strong>Closed sales:</strong>

September 2009: 879

September 2008: 723

September 2007: 521

September 2006: 705
 
<strong>Market Update 10/26/2009</strong>

<a href="http://occoastalnews.com/?p=776"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-711" title="Combo" src="http://occoastalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/10-26-2009.jpg" alt="Combo" width="800" height="449" /></a>

<a href="http://occoastalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/10-26-2009.jpg">[Enlarge]</a>



61% and still climbing... More and more homes continue to be purchased (In escrow and closed) and inventory continues to shrink. I didn't think I would be saying this with November around the corner but things are looking good. Are people still sticking to the surge of inventory theory or is it dead yet?
 
Back
Top