graphrix_IHB
New member
I have warned you more than enough times now Skippy. Now you get to face the consequences.
graphrix said:I have warned you more than enough times now Skippy. Now you get to face the consequences.
RoLar_USC said:CapitalismWorks said:RoLar_USC said:
For someone who isn't trying to promote their own business, I find it interesting that you have found a way to regularly post a link to your website...
It's a blog actually... also why I created a direct link to the enlarged image so people don't have to visit the blog.
It's only proper to cite the work of people who have obviously put in such hard work.
I'm not trying to promote my business, ie jumping on people offering my services to new people or offering my services to anyone actually. Yes, I would like to create a solid blog with decent traffic. Is there something wrong with that? I see a lot worse going on.
Careful, one of these days you'll find yourself banned.NewportSkipper said:Are you kidding me? Needling about grammer is worse than calling someone a doormat?
NewportSkipper said:Thanks for the update, Robert. Those are some fantastic numbers. Post what you want. What you do is a far cry from the begging of people like USC. I cringe every time a newbie posts some possible interest, because you know within minutes it's white-on-rice time.
USCTrojanCPA said:Careful, one of these days you'll find yourself banned.
RUSERIOUS?PANDA said:What does white-on-rice mean? I've never heard that phrase before. Does that mean when a white person jumps an Asian guy?
zovall said:Any more personal attacks from anyone and you will be banned.
irvine_home_owner said:RUSERIOUS?PANDA said:What does white-on-rice mean? I've never heard that phrase before. Does that mean when a white person jumps an Asian guy?
Maybe you eat brown rice... here is some edu-ma-cashun for ya:
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/like_white_on_rice
Don't look for it on Urban Dictionary... it's not the family-friendly connotation.
NewportSkipper said:Are you kidding me? Needling about grammer is worse than calling someone a doormat?
norcaljeff said:It's always interesting how short sighted/minded people are these day. I guess the bulls forgot about the 90 day foreclosure moratorium. That's pretty much up so the fun will begin again shortly.
RoLar_USC said:norcaljeff said:It's always interesting how short sighted/minded people are these day. I guess the bulls forgot about the 90 day foreclosure moratorium. That's pretty much up so the fun will begin again shortly.
I'm sorry but please, before you go calling people short sighted/minded, at least research the Act you are referencing. The main aspect of the 90 day foreclosure moratorium that most people overlook is that "A mortgage loan servicer who has implemented a comprehensive loan modification program may file an application for exemption from the provisions of Civil Code Section 2923.52. Approval of this application provides the mortgage loan servicer an exemption from the additional 90-day period before filing the Notice of Sale when foreclosing on real property as designated by this Section." -http://loanworkout.org/2009/07/californias-foreclosure-moratorium-does-little-to-help-homeowners/
Not only are they exempt, but anyone applying for the exemption is also exempt for 30 days while their application is being reviewed. This was completely pointless in my opinion because most lenders received exemptions, especially the large ones. Which is also why I don't believe that banks are withholding inventory on purpose, because why else would they have applied for the exeptions. The 90 day foreclosure moratorium gave them a perfect excuse to hold inventory.
“In some instances, not only did the firms receive a temporary exemption, many, such as Bank of America, Citimortgage, EMC Mortgage, Kondur Capital and Select Portfolio Servicing, all received their exemptions WITHIN 24 HOURS OF ENACTMENT OF THE LAW..."
All the main servicers have exemptions, check it out:http://www.corp.ca.gov/FSD/CFP/
"And the bill says it does not require a servicer to violate contracts for “investor-owned loans.” The most troubled loans are generally those investment banks packaged and sold, and if the servicing contract says foreclosure is preferable to a loan modification, nothing in the law stops foreclosure.
The law also says it does not require a bank to “provide a modification to a borrower who is not willing or able to pay under the modification.” I am not sure what “able to pay” means if the target debt-to-income ratio is 38 percent? Maybe if borrowers have to make other hefty payments — on cars, credit cards etc. — then they are out of luck."
http://mortgage.freedomblogging.com...-foreclosure-moratorium-starts-sort-of/11945/
This act accomplished nothing more than appeasing a couple struggling homeowners for a shortwhile before they realized they still were going to be foreclosed on.
no_vaseline said:That was solid. Now if we can get him to use the little button to make URL's clickable.........
PANDA said:I was getting a little worried thinking that both NewportSkipper and Robert got banned because i haven't seen them post in a couple of days. I am really glad that Robert is still here. Wow!.. a nice compliment from Graphrix to RoLar... This is definitely going in the right direction.