"Cry 'Havoc!', and let slip the dogs of war".

The battle rages on.

Judge rules Huntington Beach can defy California?s sanctuary law

Huntington Beach can immediately start ignoring California?s contentious ?sanctuary state? law, a judge ruled Thursday, Sept. 27.

But even before he announced his decision, Orange County Superior Court Judge James Crandall acknowledged that the case will wend its way through higher courts for months to come.

In April, Huntington Beach City Attorney Michael Gates filed a lawsuit against the state claiming that Senate Bill 54 unconstitutionally interferes with the city?s charter authority to enforce local laws and regulations.

Signed into law last year, SB 54 limits interaction between local law enforcement and federal immigration officials ? with exceptions, including cases that involve violent or ?serious? felonies.

https://www.ocregister.com/2018/09/27/judge-rules-huntington-beach-can-defy-californias-sanctuary-law/
 
Small battles are being won...

California governor vetoes 2 bills to help immigrants

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) ? California Gov. Jerry Brown vetoed two bills Thursday seeking to expand the rights of immigrants living in the country illegally and protect them from deportation.

One bill would have allowed anyone to serve on state boards and commissions regardless of their immigration status, while the other sought to block immigration authorities from making arrests inside courthouses.

The move by Brown. a Democrat, avoids opening another front in California's war with President Donald Trump.

http://www.cbs8.com/story/39195264/california-governor-vetoes-2-bills-to-help-immigrants
 
The first section of the big, beautiful wall is complete.

phs7az7ckku11.jpg


 
it's about time!!  goodbye birth tourism, goodbye anchor babies, and goodbye chain migration!

Trump plans to sign executive order curbing birthright citizenship: report

President Trump said in a newly released interview he plans to sign an executive order ending so-called "birthright citizenship" for babies of non-citizens born on U.S. soil -- a move that would mark a major overhaul of immigration policy and trigger an almost-certain legal battle.

Birthright citizenship allows any baby born on U.S. soil to automatically be a U.S. citizen.

The policy, which stems from a disputed but long-recognized interpretation of the 14th Amendment, has given rise to what Trump considers abuse of the immigration system. Trump told "Axios on HBO" that the U.S. is the only country in the world "where a person comes in and has a baby, and the baby is essentially a citizen of the United States ... with all of those benefits."

Despite Trump's claim, the U.S. is not the only nation to have birthright citizenship, but the policy is rare outside of the Americas. Trump called birthright citizenship "ridiculous" and said that "it has to end."

Under current policy, anyone born in the U.S. ? regardless of whether they are delivered by a non-citizen or undocumented immigrant ? is considered a citizen. The interpretation has been blamed for so-called 'birth tourism' and chain migration.

The 14th Amendment states: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

Trump, should he pursue the executive order, would face court challenges, and it remains unclear whether he could prevail. Many legal scholars would argue such a change requires a constitutional amendment. But some conservatives argue the existing amendment holds room for interpretation.

Michael Anton, a former national security adviser for Trump, pointed out in July that "there?s a clause in the middle of the amendment that people ignore or they misinterpret ? subject to the jurisdiction thereof.?

"What they are saying is, if you are born on U.S. soil subject to the jurisdiction of the United States ? meaning you?re the child of citizens or the child of legal immigrants, then you are entitled to citizenship,? Anton told Fox News? Tucker Carlson in July. ?If you are here illegally, if you owe allegiance to a foreign nation, if you?re the citizen of a foreign country, that clause does not apply to you.?

The interview was released after Trump told Fox News that Central American migrants who are approaching the U.S.-Mexico border in caravans are "wasting their time" and vowed, "they are not coming in."

Trump spoke to "The Ingraham Angle" hours after the Pentagon announced it would deploy some 5,200 troops to the southern border in what the commander of U.S. Northern Command described as an effort to "harden the southern border" by stiffening defenses at and near legal entry points.

"When they are captured, we don't let them out," Trump told host Laura Ingraham. "We're not letting them out ... We're not catching, we're not releasing ... We're not letting them into this country."

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals judge James C. Ho, who was appointed by Trump, has argued that it would be ?unconstitutional? to change how the 14th amendment was written and that the line subject to debate applies to the legal obligation of all foreigners and immigrants to follow U.S. law, Axios reported.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-says-he-plans-to-sign-executive-order-ending-birthright-citizenship
Click to expand...
 
Loco_local said:
How will that end chain migration? I see an increase in the mail order bride business.
Click to expand...

anchor baby born in US > anchor baby grows up in US and makes it more difficult to deport anyone living with anchor baby (including illegal alien family members) > 21 year old anchor baby sponsors parents > parents receive green card
 
This will follow the path of the travel ban...Proposal, stay, appeal, adjust, stay, appeal, stay, adjust, Supreme Court, WIN!
 
morekaos said:
This will follow the path of the travel ban...Proposal, stay, appeal, adjust, stay, appeal, stay, adjust, Supreme Court, WIN!
Click to expand...

The same qualities as Ceasar and I?m not talking about Julius Ceasar.
 
Tijuana not on board with the elite globalist liberal programme:

According to Tijuana mayor Juan Manuel Gastelum: "Supposedly they are fleeing catastrophe, mistreatment in their countries of origin. How is it possible that they arrive here and, if they want, create disorder?" the mayor said. "It's not right."

"No city in the world is prepared to receive this ? if I'm allowed ? this avalanche," he said during a news conference at City Hall. "It is a tsunami. There is concern among all citizens of Tijuana."

Gastelum, the mayor, wondered why the migrants chose Tijuana instead of other Mexican cities on the U.S. border, vaguely suggesting a sinister plot without elaborating.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/migrants-streaming-tijuana-now-face-long-stay-050505086.html

 
The war heats up again...shots fired.

Trump administration to cancel $929 million
in California high-speed rail funding

The U.S. Transportation Department announced Tuesday it would attempt to cancel $929 million in federal grant funds for California?s troubled high-speed rail project. The move marks an escalation in the war between President Trump and California in the days since Gov. Gavin Newsom announced a rethinking of the bullet train project after years of cost overruns. The Transportation Department also announced it was ?actively exploring every legal option to seek the return from California of $2.5 billion in federal funds.? It?s unclear whether it has the legal authority to do so, and California would probably oppose such a move.

https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-high-speed-rail-20190219-story.html
 
morekaos said:
The war heats up again...shots fired.

Trump administration to cancel $929 million
in California high-speed rail funding

The U.S. Transportation Department announced Tuesday it would attempt to cancel $929 million in federal grant funds for California?s troubled high-speed rail project. The move marks an escalation in the war between President Trump and California in the days since Gov. Gavin Newsom announced a rethinking of the bullet train project after years of cost overruns. The Transportation Department also announced it was ?actively exploring every legal option to seek the return from California of $2.5 billion in federal funds.? It?s unclear whether it has the legal authority to do so, and California would probably oppose such a move.

https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-high-speed-rail-20190219-story.html
Click to expand...

not before feinstein funneled a $1b contract to her husband!
 
Double tap.

TRUMP WILL OFFICIALLY END NEGOTIATIONS WITH CALIFORNIA ON FUEL ECONOMY ROLLBACKS

The Trump administration will announce it?s ending fuel economy negotiations with California.
EPA and DOT officials tried to hash out a compromise with California, but talks broke down.
Federal officials will move ahead with plans to roll back Obama-era climate regulations on cars.

https://dailycaller.com/2019/02/19/trump-california-energy-rollback/
 
The battle rages on....

Oh, to work in Nancy Pelosi's vineyard

Once again, President Trump has hit upon a supposedly ?controversial? proposal that has caused the entire herd of fainting goats in the Washington press corps to collapse in fevered panting and jerky spasms. And, once again, the idea is simple, logical and genius.

Faced with a massive and growing crisis of 100,000 illegal immigrants storming the border every month, Mr. Trump must decide what to do with all these people who have discovered the giant Trojan Horse that is America?s immigration system.
[url]https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/apr/12/oh-work-nancy-pelosis-vineyard/
[/url]
 
Weren?t tariffs supposed to be great for US and create jobs here - eh MAGA ?

You guys no longer want that I guess ? All for just freezing 2 coyotes ? 

Lousy negotiators as usual : )
 
SCOTUS rules that illegal ailen cannot be conviced of the crime of possessing a firearm by an illegal ailen if he didn't know he was an illegal ailen:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/supreme-court-backs-immigrant-unaware-184702223.html

Doesn't matter if he was in fact an illegal alien, prosecutor must prove he knew he was an illegal alien.

LOL. Liberal Conundrum.  Liberals love anti-gun laws but this anti-gun law has been rendered unenforceable because liberals have convinced people here illegally that they are merely "undocumented."
 
Happiness said:
SCOTUS rules that illegal ailen cannot be conviced of the crime of possessing a firearm by an illegal ailen if he didn't know he was an illegal ailen:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/supreme-court-backs-immigrant-unaware-184702223.html

Doesn't matter if he was in fact an illegal alien, prosecutor must prove he knew he was an illegal alien.

LOL. Liberal Conundrum.  Liberals love anti-gun laws but this anti-gun law has been rendered unenforceable because liberals have convinced people here illegally that they are merely "undocumented."
Click to expand...

it was an undocumented firearm so...it's cool!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top