I am in the market for a home in Irvine and have some comments on Bkshopr's analysis. Honestly, he sounds like an Irvine Company employee. Let's review his complaints about Columbus Grove:
1. Proximity to power lines.
The Irvine Company's Quail Hill has power lines running through it, as does The Irvine Company's Oak Creek.
2. Proximity to trash facilities.
The Irvine Company's Portola Springs, Turtle Ridge and Newport Coast developments are all in close proximity to permanent landfills. GC is merely close to a transfer station.
3. Traffic.
The Irvine Company's Quail Hill is on the 5, as are Laguna Crossing, Oak Creek and Woodbridge. Their Turtle Ridge is on the 73. Their Portola Springs is on both the 133 and the 261. Their Orchard Hills is on the 261.
4. Perceived environmental concerns.
The Irvine Company's Woodbury, Woodbury East, Portola Springs, Woodbridge and Oak Creek communites are adjacent to or close enough for worry to the old El Toro base. There is real concern about plumes being under Woodbury and Woodbury East.
5. Exteriors.
The Irvine Company exterior materials include stucco (in 12 shades of tan) and fake stone. CG's exterior materials include stucco (in 12 shades of tan and 3 shades of green), fake stone and siding (depending on style of home). The Irvine Company only allows six styles of home that are all in fact one style.
6. Quality of homes.
The Irvine Company uses several of the same builders as does CG. Both developments products come with low-grade carpet, white 6-inch Dal tile and no window casing.
7. Floor plans.
The Irvine Company-approved floor plans are among the most boring I've ever seen, especially those by California Pacific Homes. On the other hand, CG has some of the most interesting products around, including Ciara, Cantara, Verandas and Kensington Court.
8. Parks, pools and clubhouses.
The Irvine Company has done well in SOME of their communities as to these features. CG has two beautiful clubhouses and 3 parks.
9. Vegetation.
The Irvine Company brings in bigger trees and day one and have impressive entrances at SOME of their communities. CG has fewer big trees on day one, but after 2 years there is no longer a noticeable difference.
All of the communties mentioned are extremely livable, but let's not be sheeple and buy the almighty Irvine Company's propoganda. Comments from snobs are insufferable enough, but comments from snobs who have no reason to be snobs are an unforgiveable offense.