bkshopr_IHB
New member
Matchbox said:
10' yard? $700k for a 10' yard that can't be right.
2010 Woodbury/WB East New Home Collection
- Thread starter High Gravity_IHB
- Start date
NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
10' yard? $700k for a 10' yard that can't be right.
+/-2' more or less. I visually scaled it from the car and the ht of the walls in the last pic posted.... assumed 9' high ceilings.
They had to ration that sweet Irvine land. They're not making any more of it, you know.
The middle school site has been officially moved accross the street from Woodbury to the site on the southeast corner of Trabuco and Jeffery adjacent to future JOST extension. I think it is now planned for 2012.
Matchbox is right. Here is a map from the Planning Area 40 website showing Woodbury II--the middle school is located in the upper left hand corner:
I concur with your assessments and I assume you are talking about the Sonoma plans. The one thing that bothers me about their plans is the master bath. Why do they place the tub smack in the middle of the bathroom like that??? I would hate having to run around the track (tub) to get to my sink. I find it sloppy. I like how the Brookfield plans usually tucks their bathtub in a niche: very clean and neat.
Maybe they imagine a trophy wife in the always sparkling clean tub: open to view at all angles, bubbles subtly positioned. With a maid to clean up after every day. This is how Woodbury residents roll, so yeah, they got it right on.
I'll see if I can sneak some in over the weekend. They don't allow access on to their construction sites, and when they finish for the day they lock up pretty tight. All the shots were taken over the fence. Roundcorners where you at? You've got some skills in this department.
10' yard? $700k for a 10' yard that can't be right.
Matchbox_IHB
New member
bkshopr said:
+/-2' more or less. I visually scaled it from the car and the ht of the walls in the last pic posted.... assumed 9' high ceilings.
EvaLSeraphim_IHB
New member
bkshopr said:
They had to ration that sweet Irvine land. They're not making any more of it, you know.
Matchbox_IHB
New member
There is a large vacant piece of land smack in the middle of Woodbury. This parcel of land in front of Woodbury Elementary was mapped originally for 72 detached row houses similar to Cachette surrounding a park called Pear Tree Garden. This scheme was on the map on the website as recently as 2 weeks ago. I've noticed they have completely whited this portion out. (shaded in red for this purpose)
Back in July 2009, the Irvine Co gave a formal presentation to the Woodbury residents on their proposal with Brookfield to replace the original detached scheme with 99 triplex units packed into the site and eliminating Pear Tree Garden. (ala BK's BagOChips) The reason they gave for not proceeding with the original scheme was that these detached homes no longer fit with their economic calculations. The Woodbury residents built up a heavy organized resistance and stopped the project from moving forward. If this went forward, it would have also been on the menu on their 2010 series of homes.
I think the only way there will be activity on this piece of land again will be under two conditions: Pear Tree Garden returns, and having a neighborhood of detached homes. I'm comforted that the neighborhood was able to stop an atrocious plan, but leery to what the Irvine Co has got planned next. Personally wouldn't mind if it just became Permanent Open Space.
Attached files
Back in July 2009, the Irvine Co gave a formal presentation to the Woodbury residents on their proposal with Brookfield to replace the original detached scheme with 99 triplex units packed into the site and eliminating Pear Tree Garden. (ala BK's BagOChips) The reason they gave for not proceeding with the original scheme was that these detached homes no longer fit with their economic calculations. The Woodbury residents built up a heavy organized resistance and stopped the project from moving forward. If this went forward, it would have also been on the menu on their 2010 series of homes.
I think the only way there will be activity on this piece of land again will be under two conditions: Pear Tree Garden returns, and having a neighborhood of detached homes. I'm comforted that the neighborhood was able to stop an atrocious plan, but leery to what the Irvine Co has got planned next. Personally wouldn't mind if it just became Permanent Open Space.
Attached files
OC_Golfer_IHB
New member
Wasn't the land being used for Montecito and Carmel originally intended for a middle school? Would they ever use this unplanned space for a middle school? I would think if you add another 680 housing units the demand might come in line for another school.
irvine_home_owner_IHB
New member
SoCal78 could probably answer that better but I believe there are quite a few options for a middle school in that whole Woodbury/Stonegate/Portola area.
Matchbox_IHB
New member
irvine_home_owner said:
The middle school site has been officially moved accross the street from Woodbury to the site on the southeast corner of Trabuco and Jeffery adjacent to future JOST extension. I think it is now planned for 2012.
IACRenter_IHB
New member
Matchbox said:
Matchbox is right. Here is a map from the Planning Area 40 website showing Woodbury II--the middle school is located in the upper left hand corner:
usctrojanman29_IHB
New member
From the previous maps that I saw the area looked like it was going to be commercial, but I guess since the commercial RE is still dropping they changed course and now it'll be residential. I wonder if they'll name it Woodbury South. TIC's theory is..."if we build it, they will buy."IACRenter said:Matchbox said:
Matchbox is right. Here is a map from the Planning Area 40 website showing Woodbury II--the middle school is located in the upper left hand corner:
irvine_home_owner_IHB
New member
I do like some of the things they did with their floorplans:
1. Upstairs laundry with sink
2. Storage room off of laundry
3. Enclosed master shower (finally someone gets it after using that open shower design in tract homes for the last 25+ years).
4. Garage entry straight to kitchen (easier for unloading groceries)
5. Storage areas in the garage (still not as good as a 3-car garage)
6. Entry foyer
7. Walk-in pantry
Still waiting for Carmel and what The New Home Company is bringing to the table.
1. Upstairs laundry with sink
2. Storage room off of laundry
3. Enclosed master shower (finally someone gets it after using that open shower design in tract homes for the last 25+ years).
4. Garage entry straight to kitchen (easier for unloading groceries)
5. Storage areas in the garage (still not as good as a 3-car garage)
6. Entry foyer
7. Walk-in pantry
Still waiting for Carmel and what The New Home Company is bringing to the table.
bkshopr_IHB
New member
From the "L" shape configuration of Montecito it may be possible that plan 1 do have a full driveway. Plan 2 and 3 from the photo seem tight to have a full driveway.
The Brookfield floor plans are interesting because they are different. Traditionally the active spaces in off the backyard but since there is no backyard then the utility/crafts/maids room are all loaded toward the rear to open up the possibility of interesting room arrangements. Of all the plans so far this elevate my interest except for the motorcourt front doors and lacking decent backyard. The front of the homes have minimal setback from the edge of motorcourt therefore I would install bollards with reflectors in front of the homes to prevent all the Irvine good drivers from backing in to the stucco wall when pulling out from their garages. I noticed the Hondas, Toyotas, Nissans and Lexuses in Irvine have scratches, dents and damages mostly on the rear.
The floor plans have merit based on 2 years of studies of what 200+ consumers wanted INSIDE the homes. Hey what about the OUTSIDE? From what I can see from the site plan and photos there is an absence of curb appeal on how the large homes are being integrated with the site.
I hope Carmel will be a big hit. Can't wait to see the floor plans.
The Brookfield floor plans are interesting because they are different. Traditionally the active spaces in off the backyard but since there is no backyard then the utility/crafts/maids room are all loaded toward the rear to open up the possibility of interesting room arrangements. Of all the plans so far this elevate my interest except for the motorcourt front doors and lacking decent backyard. The front of the homes have minimal setback from the edge of motorcourt therefore I would install bollards with reflectors in front of the homes to prevent all the Irvine good drivers from backing in to the stucco wall when pulling out from their garages. I noticed the Hondas, Toyotas, Nissans and Lexuses in Irvine have scratches, dents and damages mostly on the rear.
The floor plans have merit based on 2 years of studies of what 200+ consumers wanted INSIDE the homes. Hey what about the OUTSIDE? From what I can see from the site plan and photos there is an absence of curb appeal on how the large homes are being integrated with the site.
I hope Carmel will be a big hit. Can't wait to see the floor plans.
Fishy333_IHB
New member
I really like the sonoma plans. Matchbox, would you be able to snap a few more pics of the sonoma plans for us? I hope sonoma homes have a backyard that is usable.
Matchbox_IHB
New member
irvine_home_owner said:
I concur with your assessments and I assume you are talking about the Sonoma plans. The one thing that bothers me about their plans is the master bath. Why do they place the tub smack in the middle of the bathroom like that??? I would hate having to run around the track (tub) to get to my sink. I find it sloppy. I like how the Brookfield plans usually tucks their bathtub in a niche: very clean and neat.
Maybe they imagine a trophy wife in the always sparkling clean tub: open to view at all angles, bubbles subtly positioned. With a maid to clean up after every day. This is how Woodbury residents roll, so yeah, they got it right on.
Matchbox_IHB
New member
Fishy333 said:
I'll see if I can sneak some in over the weekend. They don't allow access on to their construction sites, and when they finish for the day they lock up pretty tight. All the shots were taken over the fence. Roundcorners where you at? You've got some skills in this department.
bkshopr_IHB
New member
Gohabsgo_IHB
New member
Breaking News: TIC finds a way to build a home with more sf than the size of the lots it sits on.
I guess I won't live in Woodbury ever. I want a yard with grass. That's obviously asking for too much.
I guess I won't live in Woodbury ever. I want a yard with grass. That's obviously asking for too much.
irvine_home_owner_IHB
New member
I want to do some efficiency ratings using bk's awesome sf bible from this thread (http://www.irvinehousingblog.com/forums/viewreply/132551/):
Sonoma Plan 3
4/5br 3ba + Cal/Obs Room 2622sf (not sure how much sf the Obs option adds)
bk sf: 2300
2300 / 2622 = 88% B+
This makes sense as they are trying to make bigger areas and the interior of the Sonomas should be huge because my former house was ~2500 sf, had 5 br (one downstairs) and separate living, family, dining and nook.
Sonoma Plan 3
4/5br 3ba + Cal/Obs Room 2622sf (not sure how much sf the Obs option adds)
bk sf: 2300
2300 / 2622 = 88% B+
This makes sense as they are trying to make bigger areas and the interior of the Sonomas should be huge because my former house was ~2500 sf, had 5 br (one downstairs) and separate living, family, dining and nook.