J
jmoney74
Guest
exact same thing my friends with Uverse tell me. Isn't Uverse on fiber in the new areas? Or is it a marketing ploy?
thatOSguy said:We had FTTH in a new build a few years back. Even the fiber is throttled. Latency is tight, but it's just ... slow.
Cox latency is ~12ms to their core. IIRC, UVerse was 3 or 4ms.
Section-8 4All said:I had UVerse Max Plus and thought it was slow. When I ran the speed tests I was getting about 2/3s the claimed 18Mbps download. The upload speeds were horrible. I need at least 2Mbps to stream my cameras. Going for Cox the next go around for sure. Wished we had FIOS in this area.
c4 said:2/3 of the speed would still be double my current quoted DSL line speed lol, which I'm also only getting 2/3 of the speed anyway
I've heard from friend saying to stay away from FIOS though...
jmoney74 said:I only hear good things about FIOS as well.. only bad with Uverse.
thatOSguy said:FTTP and FTTH is a distinction without a difference in residential, as the "premesis" for our purposes is a Home:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FTTP
FTTN adds another hop and is generally a retrofit for nabes without FTTH/FTTP.
thatOSguy said:c4 said:For those still undecided, ATT up the UVERSE TV+Internet bundle reward to $250 this week instead of $200.
I ordered mine last week with UVERSE Family + Max Plus (18M) for $66 monthly + $200 reward card, called today and even though the customer rep wasn't able to match that $250!?, he waived the monthly modem rental instead so my monthly comes down to $59 =)
Great deal. Does that include HBO?
Looks like Contour was updated a week or so ago and I noticed an improvement in service.irvinehomeowner said:Conceptually, Contour is great... when it works.
Almost daily, the secondary boxes either freeze or can't access DVR content so I have to unplug and reboot them and sometimes that helps but not all the time.
I've had techs out several times to check signal strength and they claim it's not hardware but software related and that it will be fixed shortly. That was 3 months ago.
Section-8 4All said:c4 said:I guess my other question for existing UVERSE users, are you getting anywhere close to the quoted speed? Is new community (Stonegate in this case I'm asking) going to be on FTTP, where distance to the box should not be a factor? How about reliability?
I had UVerse Max Plus and thought it was slow. When I ran the speed tests I was getting about 2/3s the claimed 18Mbps download. The upload speeds were horrible. I need at least 2Mbps to stream my cameras. Going for Cox the next go around for sure. Wished we had FIOS in this area.
c4 said:Section-8 4All said:c4 said:I guess my other question for existing UVERSE users, are you getting anywhere close to the quoted speed? Is new community (Stonegate in this case I'm asking) going to be on FTTP, where distance to the box should not be a factor? How about reliability?
I had UVerse Max Plus and thought it was slow. When I ran the speed tests I was getting about 2/3s the claimed 18Mbps download. The upload speeds were horrible. I need at least 2Mbps to stream my cameras. Going for Cox the next go around for sure. Wished we had FIOS in this area.
Just got UVERSE Max Plus installed and managed to pull 20Mbps down and 6Mbps up!