freedomCM_IHB
New member
from that chart, it looks as if Dallas has been roughly at inflation, so about CS=120. that means that Irvine has only ~30% more to fall!
Daedalus said:I believe CS indices are already inflation-adjusted. For a market to match inflation, its curve would be a straight horizontal line. LA has about 45% to fall from current prices to reach "par" value. Irvine would probably have to fall a little more than LA.
ipoplaya said:December closing prices for Irvine are now UP over 1% vs. November and running at the same level as September.
asianinvasian said:
SoCal78 said:ipoplaya said:December closing prices for Irvine are now UP over 1% vs. November and running at the same level as September.
Whatdya mean, Ipop? I'm looking at the chart and it shows the median price being less than September by ten grand.
freedomCM said:is this for the whole irvine market, including the low-end condos?
mean or median prices for the quarts?
quarts of cs or price?
nefron said:Your closing price list shows 3671 Claremont in Westpark as sold as of 12/23/08 at $591,000 but it's back on the market as a short sale for $625,000. What's up with that?
ipoplaya said:nefron said:Your closing price list shows 3671 Claremont in Westpark as sold as of 12/23/08 at $591,000 but it's back on the market as a short sale for $625,000. What's up with that?
I noticed it coming back on to the market. Didn't realize it was showing up as a short... I thought maybe a realtor bought it to try and make a quick and very small buck. The old MLS listing definitely shows as a "closed sale". Deuce would need to check title history to know the true deal on that place.