President Trump

[irvinehomeowner]

If you don't really know, why are you selecting these quotes? I've found that many quotes are used (by one side or another) to inflame and many times, they are short quotes that are purposefully cut so that the context is missing. Stephen King learned this lesson recently:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1966474125616013664

I explained why right after the quote.

It's similar to what you are saying.

And it's ironic you are criticizing my post but allowing others to post whatever they want because it aligns with your position. Which again, just proves my point. Bias is in the beholder.

SGIP sort of understands the point I was getting at.

No one here gave 2 cents about Charlie Kirk, and now it's a tragedy and we are finding out that morekaos and his kids idolized him (jokes).

I don't think Floyd is a model citizen either but there is a difference in what happened to him vs what happened to Kirk.

I'll wait to see how that one blows your keyboards up.

 

[Liar Loan]

And don't mistake what I'm posting for sympathy for the killer... it's more of a commentary on how you all are labeling transgenders, liberals etc.

The killer's motive was almost certainly sympathy for the transgender identity. It's kind of hard to talk about this shocking killing without mentioning that.

The reason liberals are being brought up is because of the number high profile assassinations / assassination attempts / and school shootings by people with liberal motives in the past two years. The guy that targeted lawmakers in Minnesota is the one exception that keeps being brought up, but I don't hear about any other right wing killers. Maybe you should ask ChatGPT for a list of some right wing killers to balance out the commentary.

 

[morekaos]

well, turns out our biases are correct in this case and where is the violent rights righteous revenge? Why haven’t there been any reciprocal assassinations? The right just has prayer vigils the left riots and burns.

 

[irvinehomeowner]

The killer's motive was almost certainly sympathy for the transgender identity. It's kind of hard to talk about this shocking killing without mentioning that.

The reason liberals are being brought up is because of the number high profile assassinations / assassination attempts / and school shootings by people with liberal motives in the past two years. The guy that targeted lawmakers in Minnesota is the one exception that keeps being brought up, but I don't hear about any other right wing killers. Maybe you should ask ChatGPT for a list of some right wing killers to balance out the commentary.

In the last 2 years, what confirmed political ideology has been responsible for the mass shootings and assassinations?

Short answer: Far-right (white-supremacist and anti-government) extremists have accounted for the majority of confirmed ideologically-motivated extremist murders in the U.S. over the past two years — but most mass shootings overall are not political (many are driven by personal grievances, mental-health crises, domestic disputes, or criminal activity).

Key points and sources (brief):

• Government threat assessments and academic tracking show that — among ideologically motivated domestic violent extremism — far-right groups (white-supremacist and anti-government variants) remain the largest source of lethal attacks in recent years. (See DHS Homeland Threat Assessment; FBI/DHS domestic terrorism materials.)
• The Anti-Defamation League’s annual tracking found that extremist-related murders in 2024 were overwhelmingly tied to far-right extremism (their 2024 summary reported the extremist-related killings that year were linked to far-right motives). That dataset is commonly used as a barometer for ideologically motivated killings.
• Reporting on recent incidents confirms the pattern: some high-profile shooters have posted neo-Nazi or white-supremacist material or expressed anti-government views (for example, recent school-shooting suspects with neo-Nazi ties).
• Not every mass shooting is ideologically motivated. Large numbers of mass shootings are non-ideological — e.g., family/domestic violence, criminal disputes, or individuals with personal grievances — so counting all mass shootings and attributing them to one “political ideology” would be incorrect. (Researchers and the DOJ/NIJ distinguish ideologically-motivated “domestic terrorism” from other forms of mass violence.)
• Some recent assassinations and politically salient killings (for example the September 2025 killing of Charlie Kirk) are still under investigation for motive; reporting so far shows a mix of backgrounds and motives — which is why careful, case-by-case confirmation matters before assigning an ideological label.

I know Irvine Buye's list disagrees with this but my prompt had no bias in it (Like "Is all the recent violence right wing?")

 

[irvinehomeowner]

well, turns out our biases are correct in this case and where is the violent rights righteous revenge? Why haven’t there been any reciprocal assassinations? The right just has prayer vigils the left riots and burns.

Like this prayer vigil in HB?

Again.. You can always find what you want.