sell4u_IHB
New member
In time, this recession will create great buying opportunities. They always do.
+1
In time, this recession will create great buying opportunities. They always do.
25w100k+ said:awgee said:socalmd said:I'm not arguing that prices in NC won't go down further. I just disagree on how much they will go down. I could be wrong. So could you. And yes I would much rather live in a 1500 sq ft condo in NC then a 2500 sq foot house in Irvine. Mainly because I like the area and am not a fan of Irvine. We have a baby on the way, so we'll have to move in about a year or two. I bought my condo for 395K in 2002.
Everybody has different tastes and predictions. Some prefer NC, some prefer Irvine, some prefer Ladera. But those who claim to have a crystal ball are fooling themselves.
I'm still waiting to pick up a former 5 mill house in Crystal Cove for about 1 mill. It'll be nice I can roll down the hill to Maestro's for martini hour LOL
But it does not necessitate a crystal ball. It just takes correct analysis and the willingness to go against the common wisdom. Prices will continue to decrease in real vs. nominal dollars, and they still have another 35% to go. 95% of those who think they will buy a property when prices decrease to that point, will not be able to afford a property at that point. The cost of necessities will be so great that the amount that folks will be able to spend on "owning" a home will much, much less. "Affordability" will continue to elude potential home buyers and even though prices will decrease in real vs. nominal dollars, homes will become less affordable.
Does this mean another 35% off of peak, or 35% of current?
I am not a finance person... so could you explain how you would adjust for real dollar devaluation?awgee said:25w100k+ said:awgee said:socalmd said:I'm not arguing that prices in NC won't go down further. I just disagree on how much they will go down. I could be wrong. So could you. And yes I would much rather live in a 1500 sq ft condo in NC then a 2500 sq foot house in Irvine. Mainly because I like the area and am not a fan of Irvine. We have a baby on the way, so we'll have to move in about a year or two. I bought my condo for 395K in 2002.
Everybody has different tastes and predictions. Some prefer NC, some prefer Irvine, some prefer Ladera. But those who claim to have a crystal ball are fooling themselves.
I'm still waiting to pick up a former 5 mill house in Crystal Cove for about 1 mill. It'll be nice I can roll down the hill to Maestro's for martini hour LOL
But it does not necessitate a crystal ball. It just takes correct analysis and the willingness to go against the common wisdom. Prices will continue to decrease in real vs. nominal dollars, and they still have another 35% to go. 95% of those who think they will buy a property when prices decrease to that point, will not be able to afford a property at that point. The cost of necessities will be so great that the amount that folks will be able to spend on "owning" a home will much, much less. "Affordability" will continue to elude potential home buyers and even though prices will decrease in real vs. nominal dollars, homes will become less affordable.
Does this mean another 35% off of peak, or 35% of current?
35% off of current. But in REAL dollars, adjusted for REAL dollar devaluation.
halfnote19 said:I am not a finance person... so could you explain how you would adjust for real dollar devaluation?awgee said:25w100k+ said:awgee said:socalmd said:I'm not arguing that prices in NC won't go down further. I just disagree on how much they will go down. I could be wrong. So could you. And yes I would much rather live in a 1500 sq ft condo in NC then a 2500 sq foot house in Irvine. Mainly because I like the area and am not a fan of Irvine. We have a baby on the way, so we'll have to move in about a year or two. I bought my condo for 395K in 2002.
Everybody has different tastes and predictions. Some prefer NC, some prefer Irvine, some prefer Ladera. But those who claim to have a crystal ball are fooling themselves.
I'm still waiting to pick up a former 5 mill house in Crystal Cove for about 1 mill. It'll be nice I can roll down the hill to Maestro's for martini hour LOL
But it does not necessitate a crystal ball. It just takes correct analysis and the willingness to go against the common wisdom. Prices will continue to decrease in real vs. nominal dollars, and they still have another 35% to go. 95% of those who think they will buy a property when prices decrease to that point, will not be able to afford a property at that point. The cost of necessities will be so great that the amount that folks will be able to spend on "owning" a home will much, much less. "Affordability" will continue to elude potential home buyers and even though prices will decrease in real vs. nominal dollars, homes will become less affordable.
Does this mean another 35% off of peak, or 35% of current?
35% off of current. But in REAL dollars, adjusted for REAL dollar devaluation.
What does that really mean?
About 75.5 million U.S. households own the homes they live in. After a housing slump that has pushed values down 30% in some areas, roughly 12 million households, or 16%, owe more than their homes are worth, according to Moody's Economy.com.
...............
In contrast with the 12 million home borrowers estimated to be under water, 64 million have equity in their homes. These include 24 million households who own their homes free and clear, and 40 million whose homes remain worth more than is owed on them.
IrvineRenter said:WestparkRenter said:The WSJ stated there are 15 million mortgages and out of that 10 million mortgages will be in foreclosure.
Could you provide a link? That seems a bit high. I have heard estimates of 2 million (which is too conservative). I have not read anyone suggesting 10 million yet.
When home prices fell in the early 1990s, borrowers had more equity in their homes, and were able to escape foreclosure. But now, an estimated 10 million homeowners owe more on their mortgages than their homes are worth, according to Moody's economy.com.
sell4u said:Sure
Home sales are still down comparing the same dismal period last year (month over month)
Prices are down 15-20% from the peak of 2006. Couple recent sold condos hit the 30% mark, 99% though are in the 15-20%
Currently 205 listing for sale per MLS. This number usually drops into the 185/190 range come holiday season, but I think this season might be a little less jolly
Prices will continue to come down in 2009
fumbling said:sell4u said:Sure
Home sales are still down comparing the same dismal period last year (month over month)
Prices are down 15-20% from the peak of 2006. Couple recent sold condos hit the 30% mark, 99% though are in the 15-20%
Currently 205 listing for sale per MLS. This number usually drops into the 185/190 range come holiday season, but I think this season might be a little less jolly
Prices will continue to come down in 2009
How many homes sold in Newport Coast in November? In Calabasas only 6 homes sold in in the month of November with about 300 listings for sale.
jmatthew said:I posted a few months ago about renting v. selling our condo in the Summit. We're not upside-down or anything like that. We have 30-year fixed mortgage. We're not in any danger of foreclosure. Our problem is that, for many reasons both personally and professionally, we would really, really like to move to North Carolina. We would have liked to have moved before Christmas, but we can't get rid of our condo. We tried selling it for 1 1/2 years, and nothing. Looking back, we probably were asking too much. Just recently, we've been trying to rent it. Still, nothing. We have a 3br/3ba townhouse, 1763 sq. ft. We've been asking $3,300 for it, which is less per square foot that the apartments across the street, and roughly in parity with other properties in our neighborhood, at least according to the Realtor we're using. We've also indicated that we're flexible on the rent.
Now, we don't know what to do. There is an REO in our neighborhood, 18 Anjou, which is being offered at $724,500. It the same model as ours, except much more upgraded. (Which is why it's an REO. The former owner took out all the equity and covered every surface he possibly could with marble and travertine, put in stainless steel appliances, etc., basically your typical Fritalian villa overkill. I suppose some people like that look, but it's pretty hideous, in my opinion.) In any event, we've done a few upgrades and our place is not in any need of any major repairs.
We bought long enough ago that we could undercut the REO by $25,000 and still come away with a profit. So, I'm interested in opinions. Should we go for it or keep trying to find a renter?
jmatthew said:We tried selling it for 1 1/2 years, and nothing. Looking back, we probably were asking too much. Just recently, we've been trying to rent it. Still, nothing. We have a 3br/3ba townhouse, 1763 sq. ft. We've been asking $3,300 for it, which is less per square foot that the apartments across the street, and roughly in parity with other properties in our neighborhood, at least according to the Realtor we're using. We've also indicated that we're flexible on the rent.
Now, we don't know what to do.