irvinehomeowner
Well-known member
But is being you an abomination? I guess if you want to be "bothered" by the Bible. 

irvinehomeowner said:But is being you an abomination? I guess if you want to be "bothered" by the Bible.![]()
Mety said:irvinehomeowner said:But is being you an abomination? I guess if you want to be "bothered" by the Bible.![]()
Yes, being me is a sin. Being me is an abomination to God. Haven't you got that yet from what I've been saying? It doesn't matter if it's me or you or someone who's divorced or gay.
We need to replace ME with JESUS CHRIST. That is what it means to have Him our LORD. Until that takes places, being any of us is an abomination to God.
irvinehomeowner said:Mety said:irvinehomeowner said:But is being you an abomination? I guess if you want to be "bothered" by the Bible.![]()
Yes, being me is a sin. Being me is an abomination to God. Haven't you got that yet from what I've been saying? It doesn't matter if it's me or you or someone who's divorced or gay.
We need to replace ME with JESUS CHRIST. That is what it means to have Him our LORD. Until that takes places, being any of us is an abomination to God.
Did you translate that from the Bible? Because that's not what your Leviticus verse said. This is what I mean... not sure if you get my point but it's fine.
Mety said:This is what it means to take Bible as is. You don't literally stone someone who don't follow the sabbath. You see God's standards and find yourself impossible following them all since you're not holy but sinful. Thus you simply ask God for help. And that help already came, Jesus Christ, the Son of God. Please take that as is for that is what the entire Bible is teaching and you'll be free from the bondage of sin. Don't fall for the wide gate which does not take the Bible as is and start adding or subtracting things trying to fit into the current time throughout the history.
Why did God give us the Bible?
To Teach Us about Himself
To Teach Us about Ourselves and the World We Live In
To Enable Us to Live Godly Lives
To Facilitate a Relationship with God
To Exalt Jesus
irvinehomeowner said:I do read what you write, I don't think you totally do the same to what I post:
Mety said:This is what it means to take Bible as is. You don't literally stone someone who don't follow the sabbath. You see God's standards and find yourself impossible following them all since you're not holy but sinful. Thus you simply ask God for help. And that help already came, Jesus Christ, the Son of God. Please take that as is for that is what the entire Bible is teaching and you'll be free from the bondage of sin. Don't fall for the wide gate which does not take the Bible as is and start adding or subtracting things trying to fit into the current time throughout the history.
This is what Francis Chan was saying about studying the Bible.
Just like you don't take out your eye or stone someone... I don't necessarily think the Bible meant homosexuality is an abomination (and it's not even clear if it was talking about homosexuality or incest).
Why did God give us the Bible?
To Teach Us about Himself
To Teach Us about Ourselves and the World We Live In
To Enable Us to Live Godly Lives
To Facilitate a Relationship with God
To Exalt Jesus
None of that is to pass judgement on who is an abomination or to say same gender relationships are a sin.
At least that's my take... it's similar to how I think non-Christians can be saved. In the end... that's God's call.
Mety said:Again, there are different takes between you and I. I believe God literally meant what He said while giving us forgiveness. It seems like you believe God didn?t really mean what He said because He forgives anyways.
Both seem like the same since His forgiveness is there, but I think the difference is huge since one is seeing God?s Holiness and another is not. You may think your view makes God much better and friendlier, but the danger is that it skips God?s perfect standard.
God shows His judgment throughout the Bible. It?s not that God likes to kill those who don?t obey. He always allows time for repentance to not just Israel but also other nations even in the time of Joshua. You can see that through Gibronites. Those who ended up with God?s judgment are the ones who didn?t ask God for forgiveness for their sins, not those who didn?t follow the Law. I hope you get the difference.
irvinehomeowner said:Mety said:Again, there are different takes between you and I. I believe God literally meant what He said while giving us forgiveness. It seems like you believe God didn?t really mean what He said because He forgives anyways.
No. I believe what *I* think God says, I don't believe what *you* think God says.
irvinehomeowner said:Both seem like the same since His forgiveness is there, but I think the difference is huge since one is seeing God?s Holiness and another is not. You may think your view makes God much better and friendlier, but the danger is that it skips God?s perfect standard.
I never said anything about making God friendlier... making the message pastors and churches give... yes... I prefer that instead of "bothersome".
How am I skipping God's perfect standard? No one can live up to it, even Jesus faltered at one time. The question is what exactly is that standard. But in the end, does it matter, because no one can measure up right? He wants us to be the best we can be, and only he can judge that, not any man who translated words from various languages to make it seem like a certain identity is an "abomination".
irvinehomeowner said:God shows His judgment throughout the Bible. It?s not that God likes to kill those who don?t obey. He always allows time for repentance to not just Israel but also other nations even in the time of Joshua. You can see that through Gibronites. Those who ended up with God?s judgment are the ones who didn?t ask God for forgiveness for their sins, not those who didn?t follow the Law. I hope you get the difference.
Don't we all end up with God's judgement, whether or not we ask for forgiveness or follow his laws?
irvinehomeowner said:You're word smithing again... so I'll just stop the conversation until you understand what I'm saying.
Does our church allow it? No, we don't.
irvinehomeowner said:I don't think I have ignored any questions, you just ignore my answers.
It's simple... I quoted that up in the Francis Chan quote. The Bible is not exact... while infallible, it was translated by men, thus the details are subject to interpretation. I don't feel God is worried about the details, just the overall concept. Which is why I don't think God calls out homosexuality specifically as a sin... I can word smith too and just say isn't that "love your neighbor"? Isn't that what God wanted? The Bible may say that similar acts are sinful, but it doesn't mean that they can't be Christians. There are many churches that say you can't be gay and Christian, this is what I disagree with.
You even said it yourself:
Does our church allow it? No, we don't.
What do you mean by "allow it"? That kind of statement is exactly what I'm worried about.
Now I know you come from the stance that God gave the Bible to man so there are no mistakes, no interpretations... it says exactly what his will is. I agree... just not in the details.
And you talk about perfect standard, but that is unattainable, so what does it matter what the nuances are. God wants us to do our best. We will fail, and he will forgive. A Christian lying and an atheist not believing in God are the same "level" of sin if in the end they accept Jesus.
irvinehomeowner said:I think what you are missing is neither of us know exactly what God?s standard is because we are both just human.
Again, the way you phrase your posts is that you are right and I am wrong.
The way I am phrasing mine is that we can both be right or both be wrong.
What makes you think your perspective is correct or any more biblical than mine? Are you a pastor? Have you been to bible college or seminary? We are just two randoms on a semi-anonymous forum.![]()
irvinehomeowner said:There you go again. What makes your "Spirit of God" any different from mine?
And you can't say "my personal view" and then in the next sentence say "most biblical scholars and teachers". Who knows, their interpretations could also be erroneous. Everyone thought the world was flat at one time.
I'm not trying to convince you that I'm right or that you're wrong... I'm just trying to say that no one is absolutely right... no one... only God. That's where I accept you and you don't accept me (but maybe you are).