Shady Canyon

You can add another 7 properties that are currently for sale as 'quiet listings' that aren't listed in MLS that I'm aware of plus another 3 that I know are coming on the market within the next 6 weeks so bring that total to 60. Most of the buyers of custom homes buy with cash but I still think that the Shady Canyon buyer is someone rather unique and can see value in buying a lot with a 'pastoral view' versus an ocean or city lights view...now granted I'm one of those and I prefer Shady over any other area I've seen but I see the uniqueness, just not the current avg price per sq. ft. of $892. One listing has dropped to $675 and Ive seen prices on single homes drop over $2MM over the past 12 months. I think the end of the year will bring even more deals since I know several homes that are in trouble already.
 
the tax records on 11 redbird list the owner as a charles eusey. wonder if this is the same guy. business must be slow...



<a href="http://capitaladvisorsre.com/">http://capitaladvisorsre.com/</a>



the orig assessed value was around $1.8M back in 2002. asking for $3.5 is just rude.
 
So what is it, like, 1 out of every 5 homes is for sale? That must be cool to have all of that space and not have to deal with any noisy neighbors. To me that's a greater premium than any pastoral, ocean or city view.



It is a shame, however, that they had to bulldoze all of those hills when people had no intention of living there.
 
The thing to consider is how much those houses would cost to construct in a vaccum. I asked here before, and someone said that apparently "luxury homes" cost around 400 a square foot or more to develop not counting land prices. So, if you think about your average 5-6k sq.ft shady canyon residence, its not <I>that</I> overpriced.
 
I've been up to Shady Canyon a few times in the past month. I really don't understand how Goldfinch and Redbird would both be over $3M. For that price, I would much rather get an ocean view house in Laguna or Newport Coast.
 
[quote author="skek" date=1213316414]Shady Canyon may be some of the most expensive suburban, non-oceanfront real estate in the world. I just don't see the demand or the economy to justify it.</blockquote>


And yet your favorite Congressman bought there. Perhaps that fact is not a propos of anything, but I find it sort of interesting. :p



[Edited to add a smiley. I'm just yanking your chain for fun. While I disagree with the guy on a number of things, I have always found his office to be responsive and helpful. Seems like a nice (if misguided) guy, too.]
 
<em>"Mostly, my beef is with the prices?Shady Canyon may be some of the most expensive suburban, non-oceanfront real estate in the world."</em>



Shady seems like a bargain relative to Palm Desert prices (adjusting for weather and proximity to the ocean). Check out Zip Code 92210 (The Reserve), and you will find some truly startling prices, for real estate that was close to the ocean 65 million years ago.
 
the avg $/sq ft in 92210 for whats listed on redfin is $375. if shady drops to that level, look out!



probably wont though... :(
 
You have to filter 92210 for the gated communities (The Reserve, Vintage, etc). Exclude the crap, and you will see plenty of Shady Canyon-esque prices and styles. In fact, I am under the impression that the same developers were involved in all three communities.



BTW, I am with you. If Shady Canyon drops to $375 a square I'll buy a whole block!
 
[quote author="skek" date=1213316414]my understanding is that they didn't bulldoze the hills there -- one of the unique aspects of Shady is that they built the community without disturbing the natural topography of the land.</blockquote>


How did the Irvine Company manage to create 25,000+ sq ft lots and 7,000+ sq ft homes without bulldozing hills? They must be able to work miracles.
 
[quote author="IrvineRealtor" date=1213051682][quote author="awgee" date=1213050513]I just did a rough calculation of how many multi-million dollar, (let's say over $2M) homes are <strong>FOR SALE</strong> in Orange County and I got 1494. I don't how many buyers of over $2M homes are presently looking for a home, or even how over $2M home buyers there are in a year in Orange County, but something tells me it ain't 1500 or even 1000 or even 750. I dunno.</blockquote>


A quick SoCalMLS search with limits on OC, a wildcard for city, and minimum $2M pricetag shows 1163 active listings as of 8:45 this morning. (Many Newport Beach active listings are not included in this figure since they typically list only in the ValetMLS system.)</blockquote>


I guess that most people who buy multi-million dollar homes are not financing the full amount. I would be surprised if the downpayment wasn't at least 50% on average. Ok, you'll ask how do you get $1M or $2M for downpayment? I think it's possible if you started making good money early; invested your money wisely and you built a good portfolio. Also, some people really made a lot of money with RE. Most people are buy-up buyers (really!?!?). Anyhow, I think that a household making $300k can buy something in the $2M range.



I agree that the inventory is way too much compared to the pool of buyers. However, I don't think that looking at the sales of the last few months represent the potential pool of buyers either. You don't make a ton of money and waste it on a home when it is clear it will lose value. People who make that much money are bright (in general) and can recognize a good vs a bad deal.



Final point, Shady Canyon is WAY overpriced compared to Newport Coast and Pelican Hill. An ocean view home is worth so much more IMO.
 
[quote author="ABC123" date=1213335727][quote author="skek" date=1213316414]my understanding is that they didn't bulldoze the hills there -- one of the unique aspects of Shady is that they built the community without disturbing the natural topography of the land.</blockquote>


How did the Irvine Company manage to create 25,000+ sq ft lots and 7,000+ sq ft homes without bulldozing hills? They must be able to work miracles.</blockquote>


Remember, just because it is part of your lot does not mean that it is flat buildable land. Also, as I look at the map, it appears that they built in the canyons (as opposed to on the slope) to the extent possible. My eyes may be wrong, though.
 
[quote author="ABC123" date=1213335727][quote author="skek" date=1213316414]my understanding is that they didn't bulldoze the hills there -- one of the unique aspects of Shady is that they built the community without disturbing the natural topography of the land.</blockquote>


How did the Irvine Company manage to create 25,000+ sq ft lots and 7,000+ sq ft homes without bulldozing hills? They must be able to work miracles.</blockquote>


The more space between the building pads, the less total dirt you have to move.
 
Whoa. Did you see that nearly $2.5M haircut on 42 Blue Heron?!? I wonder if all the "Not Disclosed" numbers were people who paid equal to list or more.
 
[quote author="EvaLSeraphim" date=1213411034]Whoa. Did you see that nearly $2.5M haircut on 42 Blue Heron?!? I wonder if all the "Not Disclosed" numbers were people who paid equal to list or more.</blockquote>


I am thinking that was <strong>44</strong> Blue Heron and the $13,900,000 was more of an ego and interest builder than an actual expected price. My birdies told me the original purchaser for $11,660,000 never moved in and sold a year later for less than $10,500,000 one or two months ago, a realized loss of over 10% in one year.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top