The article has its merits, but at the same time is disingenuous.
The author starts by implying he/she will rent forever, and invest in stocks instead. He/she has decided that they also don’t want, or need, an automobile. Fine – I do. I would rather own stocks and a vehicle, not just stocks. I must be a fool.
He/she makes no case whatsoever for diversification, just stocks, stocks, stocks.
I have never derived one second of enjoyment from stocks I have owned. In fact, I have felt downright unhappy because of them, when a third of my portfolio evaporated a few years ago.
Even IR says that he will buy when prices reach rent equivalents.
I have never heard anyone here describe the author’s strategy as their own.
Can’t we just keep it real?