The article has its merits, but at the same time is disingenuous.
<p class="MsoNormal">The author starts by implying he/she will rent forever, and invest in stocks instead. He/she has decided that they also don’t want, or need, an automobile. Fine – I do. I would rather own stocks and a vehicle, not just stocks. I must be a fool.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">He/she makes no case whatsoever for diversification, just stocks, stocks, stocks.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I have never derived one second of enjoyment from stocks I have owned. In fact, I have felt downright unhappy because of them, when a third of my portfolio evaporated a few years ago.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Even IR says that he will buy when prices reach rent equivalents.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I have never heard anyone here describe the author’s strategy as their own.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Can’t we just keep it real?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>