The Investigation

Morekaos doesn't care if Trump raped children back in 82.  As long as his party wins!
 
Compressed-Village said:
zubs said:
Morekaos doesn't care if Trump raped children back in 82.  As long as his party wins!
Click to expand...

passed the statue of limitation.  :mad:
Click to expand...

Statue of limitations :)

Statue_of_Limitations.jpg
 
I wonder why someone would post a link to a news story? Why not just read the back of a cereal box? You will find more truth there...
 
THE FAMILY BUSINESS: TRUMP AND TAXES
ON SHOWTIME
Sunday, Oct 7 at 8:30 PM ET/PT
http://www.sho.com/titles/3465228/the-family-business-trump-and-taxes
 
OCAgentGold said:
I wonder why someone would post a link to a news story? Why not just read the back of a cereal box? You will find more truth there...
Click to expand...

It?s called plagiarism if you don?t give credit to the source of the information.
 
Speaking of tax cheats and tax fraud, one of the many good things in the Reps' tax change was eliminating the entertainment/meals deduction. How annoying was it dining with your self-employed friends and watching them keep the receipt and write a note on it (in order to deduct meal/drinks completely unrelated to their business)?
 
Perspective said:
Speaking of tax cheats and tax fraud, one of the many good things in the Reps' tax change was eliminating the entertainment/meals deduction. How annoying was it dining with your self-employed friends and watching them keep the receipt and write a note on it (in order to deduct meal/drinks completely unrelated to their business)?
Click to expand...

Bro that was a gold mind.

Or charge it to the client. (hopefully the budget had room for food charges)


 
eyephone said:
Perspective said:
Speaking of tax cheats and tax fraud, one of the many good things in the Reps' tax change was eliminating the entertainment/meals deduction. How annoying was it dining with your self-employed friends and watching them keep the receipt and write a note on it (in order to deduct meal/drinks completely unrelated to their business)?
Click to expand...

Bro that was a gold mind.

Or charge it to the client. (hopefully the budget had room for food charges)
Click to expand...

eh, Enhanced Interrogation Techniques, Torture.

When it comes to tax law, a surprising amount boils down to what you call it.  Partying isn't partying if you're having a promotional event and a promotional event isn't a business expense if you're partying.

Perjury is the same way.  Making a false statement under oath is not perjury.  Willfully telling an untruth under oath is perjury.

 
one does not willingly just give up their clearance.  i hear orange jumpsuits are very fashionable this time of year  >:D

Clinton's security clearance withdrawn at her request

The State Department has revoked former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's security clearance after she requested that it be withdrawn, according to a letter released Friday by a top GOP senator.

The State Department?in a letter dated Sept. 21 but publicly released Friday? told Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, that the security clearance was revoked on August 30 after Clinton requested that it be withdrawn.

"We would like to provide you with an update on the status of former Secretary Clinton's security clearance and the ongoing administrative review pertaining to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and other current and former department officials," Charles Faulkner, the acting assistant secretary of legislative affairs, wrote to Grassley.

The State Department added in the letter to Grassley that five of Clinton's aides had also had their security clearance revoked.

Four of the names are redacted but one aide listed in the email is Cheryl Mills, who worked as Clinton's chief of staff.

"As we previously informed the committee, these individuals had been granted access to classified information through a request made by Secretary Clinton designating them as researchers," Faulkner added.

Clinton's security clearance has been a long-running sore spot for conservatives after the FBI, led by then-Director James Comey, found in 2016 that Clinton had been "extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."

Clinton used a private email server during her time as secretary of State, and was attacked by President Trump and Republicans about it during the 2016 presidential campaign when she became the Democratic nominee.

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/411219-clintons-security-clearance-withdrawn-at-her-request
Click to expand...
 
in case you were tired of winning today!

Stormy Daniels defamation suit against Trump tossed on 1st Amendment grounds

A federal judge in Los Angeles on Monday threw out adult-film actress Stormy Daniel?s defamation lawsuit against President Trump on free-speech grounds.

?The court agrees with Mr. Trump?s argument because the tweet in question constitutes ?rhetorical hyperbole? normally associated with politics and public discourse in the U.S.,? U.S. District Judge S. James Otero in Los Angeles said in a ruling Monday, as Bloomberg reported. ?The First Amendment protects this type of rhetorical statement.?

Trump?s camp labeled the Monday ruling as a major win.

?The ruling also states that the President is entitled to an award of his attorneys? fees against Stormy Daniels,? Trump attorney Charles Harder said in a statement to Fox News. ?No amount of spin or commentary by Stormy Daniels or her lawyer, Mr. (Michael) Avenatti, can truthfully characterize today?s ruling in any way other than total victory for President Trump and total defeat for Stormy Daniels.  The amount of the award for President Trump?s attorneys? fees will be determined at a later date.?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/stormy-daniels-defamation-suit-against-trump-tossed-on-1st-amendment-grounds
Click to expand...
 
Calling people names is nothing to brag about.

Kings said:
in case you were tired of winning today!

Stormy Daniels defamation suit against Trump tossed on 1st Amendment grounds

A federal judge in Los Angeles on Monday threw out adult-film actress Stormy Daniel?s defamation lawsuit against President Trump on free-speech grounds.

?The court agrees with Mr. Trump?s argument because the tweet in question constitutes ?rhetorical hyperbole? normally associated with politics and public discourse in the U.S.,? U.S. District Judge S. James Otero in Los Angeles said in a ruling Monday, as Bloomberg reported. ?The First Amendment protects this type of rhetorical statement.?

Trump?s camp labeled the Monday ruling as a major win.

?The ruling also states that the President is entitled to an award of his attorneys? fees against Stormy Daniels,? Trump attorney Charles Harder said in a statement to Fox News. ?No amount of spin or commentary by Stormy Daniels or her lawyer, Mr. (Michael) Avenatti, can truthfully characterize today?s ruling in any way other than total victory for President Trump and total defeat for Stormy Daniels.  The amount of the award for President Trump?s attorneys? fees will be determined at a later date.?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/stormy-daniels-defamation-suit-against-trump-tossed-on-1st-amendment-grounds
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top