Wow, there are a lot of comments, and I am perpetually without time these days. I'll address everything that jumped out at me in a single reply.
First of all and most importantly, SoCal, I owe you an email to catch you up on numerous things. I'll try to make time this weekend to reach out to you.
Second, some would consider this nitpicking, but based on the emotional bonds that a person develops after spending a lot of time with any community (online or not), I feel a little clarification about the lineage of forums I am talkiing about is in order. The original Tom's Hardware forum was on Delphi, and was known as Tom's Hardware. When Tom created his own non-Delphi forum, Tom's Hardware Forum was renamed to Extreme Computing. The community didn't like the forum software on Tom's Hardware, so we stayed together at Delphi. The larger Delphi forum community was enough to provide Extreme Computing with new members. Now for the clarification, it wasn't Extreme Computing that broke away from Delphi. When Delphi appointed a moderator to an unmoderrated community who started deleting threads and banning long time members, we started The Lab. The Lab is the community that broke away from Delphi, and we created our own software to do so.
OK, nit picking aside, back to relevant stuff for the future of this forum.
Though a few years had passed between Tom pulling away from our community and the creation of The Lab, the volumes of traffic I am referring to our what we started with as The Lab. As a forum that formed around an interest in tweaking hardware to gain performance, we had everyone from PC technicians who worked with hardware day in and day out to engineers in all kinds of disciplines who viewed hardware modifications as an esoteric hobby. (I was in the second group. I am a software/database person)
The point of that previous paragraph is that if you find the right center of interest and have a feeder system, you don't need to have a single high profile entity like Tom ( or IR for that matter ) to draw people into the community. But people leaving a community tends to have a cascading effect on other members of the community. Without new members continually being drawn in, the community will go it's own way over time. If, for example, SoCal78 found that she needed to spend more time with her family and didn't have time for the forums, there are a certain number of people who enjoy reading her posts on parenting, education, and other issues that would spend less time in the community. Their absence (or reduced participation) would impact people who liked their contributions.
As a Republican with Libertarian leanings, I believe in listening to what the market has to tell me. If you were to ask me what the content of a good feeder system would be centered around, I'd tell you that I simply don't know. It would be arrogant for me to assume that things that I am interested would appeal to everyone. I believe that collective intelligence will always trump individual intelligence. Therefore, rather than taking any one idea from this or other threads, can someone start either an area or individual polls to get people talking about centers of focus for this new community.
With that out of the way, I'd like to suggest two topics to center the new community around - Extreme Right Wing Politics, and Active Elimination of the Democrat Party.
OK, back to more reminiscing - A couple of people mentioned familiarity with Tom's Hardware forum. Were you just casually aware of the forums? Or did you participate? I used to post there under my real name, and was very high profile. If you mention your old handles, it's quite possible that we knew each other in a past forum life.
On to freedom of speech zones, I'm sure I am about to mortify quite a few people, but I'll share a few memories with you on how we made an unmoderated forum work. Before I share these experiences, let me say on record that I think that this community is to gentile and well mannered for an environment like what we had, and I think that complete freedom would work well in this environment.
First of all, we never banned anyone. As computer people, we were into anonymous proxies before software like Tor made it easy for anyone to hide where they were coming from. Attention feeds trolls. Taking time and effort to keep a troll out of a community or clean up their messes only gives them more energy and creates more work for moderators to keep up with. All-in-all, it's a bad cycle and we felt that you shouldn't put unpaid volunteers through. (Actually in the early days, we couldn't ban or moderate people even if we wanted to)
But that doesn't mean that spammers and trolls had impunity in our community. We were a community built around uncommon and esoteric skills with computers. Rather than trying to eliminate trolls, the community had fun playing with them. A large, active and creative community can bring any troll to his knees. As one example, I remember a troll we had on Extreme Computing (our Delphi days). I did a little research and found that he was a member of another Delphi community, and he posted a resume as an attachment in a message to a friend on that community in an attempt to get a summer job. (He was a kid in high school)
So I posted a link to his resume on Extreme Computing, and another person took his resume out of his control by downloading it and re-uploading it on Delphi and a few free websites. Another member of the community with a wicked sense of humor was aware of a phone sex line with a website that would let you enter a phone number and get a free two minute sample call. Putting 2 and 2 together, he started a thread with a link to the form where you enter the phone number, and the phone number of the troll. Of course this kid still lived with his parents, and they started getting all kinds of interesting calls all night every night. The kid came back begging us to remove the post, but of course we didn't have the ability to moderate our own forum at that time, nor could we remove the off-Delphi posts with the same information. After a few months the community moved on to other amusing ideas, but the troll learned that it's not a good idea to poke sticks into a crowd of computer experts.
(Actually, thinking back, the Brightwater/Huntington Beach threads on IHB were really a similar form of troll control. Not quite as amusing, but it's still an example of what the community can do to police itself and liberate the actual moderators from the need to do work)
Now on to overclocking itself. I readily acknowledge that the economics of computer hardware have changed. But still the same, if you can get free performance, why not do so? Also, by taking time to research all the components you want in a system, you end up with a higher quality and more stable system than if you simply go to Dell and buy whatever bargain box you can find a coupon code for on bensbargains.net . And while video game performance is largely dependent on video card performance (video cards can and should be overclocked too), there are those of us who still need more CPU power. I don't have time to play games any more, but I do need a high power environment for my lab at home.