SCOTUS

[fortune11]

What type of high school student maintains a calendar detailing the underage drinking parties they attended

It?s almost like kavanuagh knew some things from his ugly past were bound to come up and was prepared w 65 women witnessses to character at the ready

So unlike Romney , this dude actually does have a ?binder full of women? 

way to attack a kid for keeping a calendar in his youth.  and congratulations to the dems, whose latest smear campaign is against a literal nerd virgin who loves baseball, but probably never made it past second base until he was almost 30.  complete backfire!

Just so we are clear - we are both referring to an over privileged white Middle Aged rich man here  right ?  I am sure these are the sorts of people Jesus would reserve his pity for

But looks like this scotus thread has touched a nerve with kings as he has gone all 100 percent serious and preachy here instead of atleast making a little bit of attempt at a funny / humor type comeback

 

[eyephone]

King: It all comes down to this. Would you rush to hire someone or would you want to make sure you are hiring the right person?

 

[morekaos]

I wouldn't look into a more than qualified candidates unsubstantiated teenage fumblings from 30 years ago.  What they accomplished with their lives overall is what matters. 

 

[fortune11]

>

King: It all comes down to this. Would you rush to hire someone or would you want to make sure you are hiring the right person?

Especially when it?s an appointment for LIFE !!!!

 

[fortune11]

I wouldn't look into a more than qualified candidates unsubstantiated teenage fumblings from 30 years ago.  What they accomplished with their lives overall is what matters. 

Yes , tell that to all the minority inmates in prison who have been locked up for relatively insignificant Crimes in their youth and have been suffering ever since . Your beloved sex offender judge himself is on record while sentencing a 17 y old girl that ? teenagers are old enough to realize the consequences of their actions.

This standard of ?boys will be boys ? only applies to privileged and prep school teenagers .

I have seen quite a few in my job and their arrogance lives true to the stereotype

But ultimately this is a single person and deserves to stand and fall on his own actions . Wouldn?t an fbi investigation clear all that in a few days ?

 

[riznick]

The partisan outrage is hilarious.  What a joke people have become.

 

[eyephone]

I wouldn't look into a more than qualified candidates unsubstantiated teenage fumblings from 30 years ago.  What they accomplished with their lives overall is what matters. 

Google Mark Judge

 

[morekaos]

And who would the interviewer interview?  All four of those she named as present have already stated they don't remember the incident.  Any others are second hand or rumors.  Ramirez is even worse.  Not one independent recollection from anyone including her. She has already admitted to being hammered and foggy and seemed to only remember "facts" her lawyer pointed out to her.  Yah, this is stall tactic and an obvious smear that would do nothing but waste time.  I venture she will back out of the Thursday testimony because she will feel "threatened".  This is all just one big joke.

 

[eyephone]

No comment on Mark Judge? 

And who would the interviewer interview?  All four of those she named as present have already stated they don't remember the incident.  Any others are second hand or rumors.  Ramirez is even worse.  Not one independent recollection from anyone including her. She has already admitted to being hammered and foggy and seemed to only remember "facts" her lawyer pointed out to her.  Yah, this is stall tactic and an obvious smear that would do nothing but waste time.  I venture she will back out of the Thursday testimony because she will feel "threatened".  This is all just one big joke.

 

[fortune11]

The partisan outrage is hilarious.  What a joke people have become.

Here comes the preacher ... tsk tsk tsk

So are you happy (?hilarious ?) ? Or sad ?  Or trying to make a wisecrack ?  Come on,  decide

 

[morekaos]

No comment on Mark Judge? 

And who would the interviewer interview?  All four of those she named as present have already stated they don't remember the incident.  Any others are second hand or rumors.  Ramirez is even worse.  Not one independent recollection from anyone including her. She has already admitted to being hammered and foggy and seemed to only remember "facts" her lawyer pointed out to her.  Yah, this is stall tactic and an obvious smear that would do nothing but waste time.  I venture she will back out of the Thursday testimony because she will feel "threatened".  This is all just one big joke.

I could care less about Judge.  He is not the one they are aiming at.

 

[riznick]

The partisan outrage is hilarious.  What a joke people have become.

Here comes the preacher ... tsk tsk tsk

So are you happy (?hilarious ?) ? Or sad ?  Or trying to make a wisecrack ?  Come on,  decide

Entertained
Right now i am watching a loser try to troll others and fail.

 

[eyephone]

No comment on Mark Judge? 

And who would the interviewer interview?  All four of those she named as present have already stated they don't remember the incident.  Any others are second hand or rumors.  Ramirez is even worse.  Not one independent recollection from anyone including her. She has already admitted to being hammered and foggy and seemed to only remember "facts" her lawyer pointed out to her.  Yah, this is stall tactic and an obvious smear that would do nothing but waste time.  I venture she will back out of the Thursday testimony because she will feel "threatened".  This is all just one big joke.

I could care less about Judge.  He is not the one they are aiming at.

You choose not to know the facts and about him and his friend. (Pick and choose the articles you read?)

I?m not going to read that article because it?s unfavorable.

Check out the yahoo article.

 

[morekaos]

Which "facts" are you referring to? I found none in that article.  Again, just conjecture and second hand rumors. Anything coming out of the mouth of creepy porn lawyer should be flushed down the toilet.

 

[eyephone]

Which "facts" are you referring to? I found none in that article.  Again, just conjecture and second hand rumors. Anything coming out of the mouth of creepy porn lawyer should be flushed down the toilet.

There?s many other articles about him. How come congress won?t suppena him to testify? (Really weak) Maybe because it doesn?t help Kavanaugh.

The fact that you previously mentioned that you can care less about Mark Judge shows that you don?t want to know.

 

[morekaos]

Among the details alleged by Christine Blasey Ford regarding herself and Brett Kavanaugh, she names their classmate Mark Judge as the sole witness. Judge, through his attorney, submitted a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee today regarding his recollections and his willingness to speak before a hearing.

?I have no memory of this alleged incident,? Judge stated. ?Brett Kavanaugh and I were friends in high school but I do not recall the party described in Dr. Ford?s letter. More to the point, I never saw Brett act in the manner Dr. Ford describes.?

That's good enough for me

 

[Happiness]

Wouldn?t an fbi investigation clear all that in a few days ?

Yes it would but that's not what the Libs want. The Libs want a lengthy FBI investigation. The Libs want to delay the nomination past the November election, not for a few days.

If the FBI did resolve this matter in a few days, the Libs would have to deploy their next pathetic delay tactic. Trust me, the Libs already have a stockpile of delay tactics ready for immediate deployment if Professor Ford fails.

 

[eyephone]

Among the details alleged by Christine Blasey Ford regarding herself and Brett Kavanaugh, she names their classmate Mark Judge as the sole witness. Judge, through his attorney, submitted a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee today regarding his recollections and his willingness to speak before a hearing.

?I have no memory of this alleged incident,? Judge stated. ?Brett Kavanaugh and I were friends in high school but I do not recall the party described in Dr. Ford?s letter. More to the point, I never saw Brett act in the manner Dr. Ford describes.?

That's good enough for me

Why not under oath? To get to the bottom of it.

 

[eyephone]

Wouldn?t an fbi investigation clear all that in a few days ?

Yes it would but that's not what the Libs want. The Libs want a lengthy FBI investigation. The Libs want to delay the nomination past the November election, not for a few days.

If the FBI did resolve this matter in a few days, the Libs would have to deploy their next pathetic delay tactic. Trust me, the Libs already have a stockpile of delay tactics ready for immediate deployment if Professor Ford fails.

Just say because the Senate might flip to the Democrats. So you have to rush.

Do yourself a favor and make some calls for Ted Cruz.

 

[fortune11]

Kavanaugh has made some very strange choices in defending himself against allegations of sexual assault

Instead of simply maintaining his innocence, he has offered a series of wild and implausible explanations for his predicament

In a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee yesterday, Kavanaugh claimed the two women accusing him of sexual assault were coordinating with each other.

This is an outlandish claim and he offered no evidence to support it

In his Fox News interview, he repeated the theory that Ford may be confusing him with someone else who did assault her.

This echoes his friend Ed Whelan's irresponsible comments on Twitter. No explanation as to why he believes this

When the NYT reported Kavanaugh & his football teammates referenced the "Renate Alumni" on their yearbook pages, Kavanaugh said it was a reference to a "kiss" w/a girl from a nearby school.  It's implausible, but the woman also says she never kissed him.

In response to allegations by Deborah Ramirez, Kavanaugh told Fox.  ??  "The men I knew in college say it is inconceivable that I could have done such a thing"

His roommate that year says he believes Ramirez because Kavanaugh was often"incoherently drunk."

So again , given that this is a LIFETIME appointment , and there is already the GOP turd standard percent of waiting up to 1 year because , you know , ?elections?  , conservatives can take  their (il) logic and shove it  

The midterm turnout will be interesting now - in a way , if kavanugh is not confirmed , stakes are much higher for republicans and may add to intensity . I actually think it is politically beneficial for dems  midterm prospects if  this preppy sex offender was confirmed and then more bad stuff comes out after that .