mythicquest said:It ain't easy selling new houses >$600/sf lol
LOL truth.
mythicquest said:It ain't easy selling new houses >$600/sf lol
mythicquest said:I wonder what iPac will do if it REALLY stagnates. Are they going to just sit tight, hold the line, and just wait it out?
I can only think of one time they lowered the price, and that was pre-release of the original Ravello going from 1.8 to 1.7.
iacrenter said:TIC has deep pockets and long time lines. They sat on Orchard Hills development for years with no homes. The shopping center opened in June 2007. By 2012 all the major streets were complete, the land was graded, and the guard houses were in. Homes didn't start selling until 2014.
iacrenter said:TIC has deep pockets and long time lines. They sat on Orchard Hills development for years with no homes. The shopping center opened in June 2007. By 2012 all the major streets were complete, the land was graded, and the guard houses were in. Homes didn't start selling until 2014.
USCTrojanCPA said:iacrenter said:TIC has deep pockets and long time lines. They sat on Orchard Hills development for years with no homes. The shopping center opened in June 2007. By 2012 all the major streets were complete, the land was graded, and the guard houses were in. Homes didn't start selling until 2014.
iacrenter said:TIC has deep pockets and long time lines. They sat on Orchard Hills development for years with no homes. The shopping center opened in June 2007. By 2012 all the major streets were complete, the land was graded, and the guard houses were in. Homes didn't start selling until 2014.
Irvine Company is the poster child for patient money.
btcETH said:Does anyone know if the backyard setback of Ravello at Groves larger than the one in reserve? It seems the standard lot there is 4950, wonder if that extra sqft goes to sideway or backyard.
mythicquest said:btcETH said:Does anyone know if the backyard setback of Ravello at Groves larger than the one in reserve? It seems the standard lot there is 4950, wonder if that extra sqft goes to sideway or backyard.
I'm not sure about the setbacks at Reserve, but at Groves the side yards are average about 10 feet wide, and the rear ranges from approx 15-20 feet from the edge of the outdoor living it seems. Of note, the plan 3 backyard with the outdoor living has the smallest setback from the edge of the outdoor space to the back wall (~12 ft?).
Source: Looked at the original VTTM tract map and also briefly saw the updated tract map with the modified measurements. Originally this tract was supposed to have larger homes ranging from 3400-3600 sf, but IPAC modified the VTTM so they could just use the existing Ravello dimensions there.
btcETH said:mythicquest said:btcETH said:Does anyone know if the backyard setback of Ravello at Groves larger than the one in reserve? It seems the standard lot there is 4950, wonder if that extra sqft goes to sideway or backyard.
I'm not sure about the setbacks at Reserve, but at Groves the side yards are average about 10 feet wide, and the rear ranges from approx 15-20 feet from the edge of the outdoor living it seems. Of note, the plan 3 backyard with the outdoor living has the smallest setback from the edge of the outdoor space to the back wall (~12 ft?).
Source: Looked at the original VTTM tract map and also briefly saw the updated tract map with the modified measurements. Originally this tract was supposed to have larger homes ranging from 3400-3600 sf, but IPAC modified the VTTM so they could just use the existing Ravello dimensions there.
You are right. Checked with office. Back is 20/19/12.5 ft for Plan1/2/3. Side is 8.5-10 on one side.
btcETH said:mythicquest said:btcETH said:Does anyone know if the backyard setback of Ravello at Groves larger than the one in reserve? It seems the standard lot there is 4950, wonder if that extra sqft goes to sideway or backyard.
I'm not sure about the setbacks at Reserve, but at Groves the side yards are average about 10 feet wide, and the rear ranges from approx 15-20 feet from the edge of the outdoor living it seems. Of note, the plan 3 backyard with the outdoor living has the smallest setback from the edge of the outdoor space to the back wall (~12 ft?).
Source: Looked at the original VTTM tract map and also briefly saw the updated tract map with the modified measurements. Originally this tract was supposed to have larger homes ranging from 3400-3600 sf, but IPAC modified the VTTM so they could just use the existing Ravello dimensions there.
You are right. Checked with office. Back is 20/19/12.5 ft for Plan1/2/3. Side is 8.5-10 on one side.
mythicquest said:btcETH said:mythicquest said:btcETH said:Does anyone know if the backyard setback of Ravello at Groves larger than the one in reserve? It seems the standard lot there is 4950, wonder if that extra sqft goes to sideway or backyard.
I'm not sure about the setbacks at Reserve, but at Groves the side yards are average about 10 feet wide, and the rear ranges from approx 15-20 feet from the edge of the outdoor living it seems. Of note, the plan 3 backyard with the outdoor living has the smallest setback from the edge of the outdoor space to the back wall (~12 ft?).
Source: Looked at the original VTTM tract map and also briefly saw the updated tract map with the modified measurements. Originally this tract was supposed to have larger homes ranging from 3400-3600 sf, but IPAC modified the VTTM so they could just use the existing Ravello dimensions there.
You are right. Checked with office. Back is 20/19/12.5 ft for Plan1/2/3. Side is 8.5-10 on one side.
Did you see how much the setback would be for plan 3 without the outdoor california room?
USCTrojanCPA said:btcETH said:mythicquest said:btcETH said:Does anyone know if the backyard setback of Ravello at Groves larger than the one in reserve? It seems the standard lot there is 4950, wonder if that extra sqft goes to sideway or backyard.
I'm not sure about the setbacks at Reserve, but at Groves the side yards are average about 10 feet wide, and the rear ranges from approx 15-20 feet from the edge of the outdoor living it seems. Of note, the plan 3 backyard with the outdoor living has the smallest setback from the edge of the outdoor space to the back wall (~12 ft?).
Source: Looked at the original VTTM tract map and also briefly saw the updated tract map with the modified measurements. Originally this tract was supposed to have larger homes ranging from 3400-3600 sf, but IPAC modified the VTTM so they could just use the existing Ravello dimensions there.
You are right. Checked with office. Back is 20/19/12.5 ft for Plan1/2/3. Side is 8.5-10 on one side.
When I spoke to the sales folks at the Ravello sales office at the Reserve they mentioned that the Grove lots will be smaller than the Reserve lots on average.
mythicquest said:Well at least these backyards shouldn't feel too cramped... with a ~20 x 50 ft backyard there should be space for a pool in many cases. Definitely larger than most of the Cetara backyards.
mythicquest said:They are not