reason_IHB
New member
The_Maestro said:
hahaha. That's how I am feeling right now.
The_Maestro said:
reason said:reason said:trrenter said:In my opinion Obama is trying to move to quickly.
When you rush to make important decesions they are usually not good decesions. Why did we have to fast track the stimulus package? The dems are freely admitting it is working as planned the never intended to spend all the money immediately. So if it was a slow moving plan what was the need to rush the plan? Maybe if we took more time crafting the bill it could have had a more immediate impact.
Why the rush to ge the healthcare bill through Congress? Slow down take your time think things through.
See my comments on Cash for Clunkers. That is just a stupid idea in my opinion. I am not worried about my taxes I worry about my kids and grandkids taxes.
I also have not seen or heard of the cuts we are making to pay for any of these projects. Which was a campaign promise.
So do I think he is ruining this country? No.
Do I think all of his decesions are going to have a positive impact. No.
Okay, here we go again. Have you forgotten the unaccountable billions upon billions of the stimulus package right before GWB terms ended? We still don't know where those tax dollars went. If you're going to pick on the current President. You can't ignore what his immediate predessor did also.
BTW, I am not a Democrat or a Republican.
The_Maestro said:Well if that isn't calling the kettle black. Get over yourself. If you hadn't started off with such an antagonistic thread maybe we could have avoided most of this meaningless discourse. It's only taken us 5 pages to get some consensus that Obama (alone) is not ruining the country.
trrenter said:Why the rush to ge the healthcare bill through Congress? Slow down take your time think things through.
Look4house said:What do you think Mr. Obama is going to do in 2010, 2011 to reduce our deficits?
no_vaseline said:Look4house said:What do you think Mr. Obama is going to do in 2010, 2011 to reduce our deficits?
Nothing. He won't have to lift a single finger nor sign a single bill.
green_cactus said:trrenter said:Why the rush to ge the healthcare bill through Congress? Slow down take your time think things through.
Because that didn't work for Clinton - it only provided ample time for antagonistic attacks that would eventually derail the whole effort. Even now, you can see the talking heads making up all sort of ludicrous claims to discredit healthcare (for example, all the nonsense about killing old people). At this point in time, there is no meaningful alternative from the opposition. They do agree that "something" has to be done but nothing solid is being proposed.
trrenter said:I can give my opinion on Cash for Clunkers.
It sucks!!!!
Cash for Clunkers' Impact on Economy and Environment Is Negligible
This is a subsidy to the car companies and not just American companies.
A simple ROI would tell you moving from a fuel guzzler to a more fuel efficient car is the right move.
If you buy a 17k Ford focus with the clunkers money and you will walk out of the dealer with that car for about 12.5 K. Run the ROI in gas savings, the focus gets 35mpg. If you drive 20k miles a year you could save between $2,200 - $3,800 a year on gas alone. I will go with 3k as the average yearly savings on gas. Now consider the warranty on a new car so you are almost void of car repair bils. Lets be conservative and say a clunker would require $600 a year in repairs. So you save $3600 a year buy buying your new Ford Focus.
If your car payment is less then $300 a month for the Ford Focus you are actually saving money every month.
That is a pretty smart move even without the Clunkers program rebate.
So we are paying people not to be stupid I guess.
So somone planning to trade in a clunker gets a windfall at my childrens expense. They will be picking up the bill for this when they start paying taxes.
Look4house said:green_cactus said:trrenter said:Why the rush to ge the healthcare bill through Congress? Slow down take your time think things through.
Because that didn't work for Clinton - it only provided ample time for antagonistic attacks that would eventually derail the whole effort. Even now, you can see the talking heads making up all sort of ludicrous claims to discredit healthcare (for example, all the nonsense about killing old people). At this point in time, there is no meaningful alternative from the opposition. They do agree that "something" has to be done but nothing solid is being proposed.
Even, if there are a lot of disagreement, no one should rush something through with a plan that will most likely fail. If you do some research, government run insurance plan is unlikely the prescription for healthcare reform. Politics cannot mix with healthcare.
The_Maestro said:True, and everything came to a head during Bush's 8 years. That's not to say that everything was his fault. Just as Obama is not ruining the country. Obama was left with a country in crisis mode. Concluding that he is ruining the country when he was trying to save it from ruin (and taking the rest of the world with it) is rediculous, as rediculous as saying it's Washington's fault. I still haven't heard what the (short term) alternatives were to the actions he took. I can certainly agree that we need reform on many, many things. I don't think Obama is god though and didn't expect reform in 7 months and I don't expect reform on more than a few things. As has been discussed (finally) there are many more factors that contribute to the problems with our country that have been compounding for years and decades. Is it reasonable to hold Obama accountable for fixing all of those problems? Seems a bit unrealistic to me, unless Obama really is god. I never held him in such high regard.
Look4house said:I have not read anyone saying Obama is ruining our country. The question was asked whether he is. . . . .
Look4house said:no_vaseline said:Look4house said:What do you think Mr. Obama is going to do in 2010, 2011 to reduce our deficits?
Nothing. He won't have to lift a single finger nor sign a single bill.
I can't resist anymore. Are you now the official Whitehouse spokesman for the President? Like I said your energy and potential are best suited for the Late Show, not on this useless thread.
no_vaseline said:Look4house said:no_vaseline said:Look4house said:What do you think Mr. Obama is going to do in 2010, 2011 to reduce our deficits?
Nothing. He won't have to lift a single finger nor sign a single bill.
I can't resist anymore. Are you now the official Whitehouse spokesman for the President? Like I said your energy and potential are best suited for the Late Show, not on this useless thread.
C'mon. You know the answer already.
And so does the Heritage foundation.
And nobody has to do squat other than let the clock run out.
No_Such_Reality said:And those deficits assume the clock runs out.
ABC123 said:I haven't read any of the responses in the thread but to answer the question in the title of the thread, "Is Obama Ruining the Country", the answer is yes.
reason said:ABC123 said:I haven't read any of the responses in the thread but to answer the question in the title of the thread, "Is Obama Ruining the Country", the answer is yes.
oops.
no_vaseline said:reason said:ABC123 said:I haven't read any of the responses in the thread but to answer the question in the title of the thread, "Is Obama Ruining the Country", the answer is yes.
oops.
Hey - at least ABC is being honest! lol.