SoCal78_IHB
New member
BK - do you think they will stop at 3-stories or go higher... maybe 4 stories eventually? I don't know if there is such a thing for a townhome.
SoCal78 said:BK - do you think they will stop at 3-stories or go higher... maybe 4 stories eventually? I don't know if there is such a thing for a townhome.
Why do they need to make $7-7.5 million in gross sales per acre? Weren't they doing find when they were making 50% of that 7-8 years ago? What changed? Kool-aid induced withdrawls?bkshopr said:irvine_home_owner said:So instead of BagOChips... it's more like CanOPringles? Not only do they stack high... but you can fit at least 3 of them into the space a BagOChips takes.usctrojanman29 said:Yup, that's the way to get to that magical $375 mark...just stack'em and pack'em (get the sardine picture out). If TIC builds them, the sheople will come. hahabkshopr said:Like I said: "Bag of Chips" theory is the most applicable to the triplex set-up. You knew that already before the mail.
$375x90%=$338/sf By adding more chips may disguise the value ratio to $310/sf.
Man! You guys are getting this concept quick. The Pringles can takes up less shelf space and more chips to a can. Higher density and more footage is the key to disguise benchmark pricing. Ultimately TIC needs $7-7.5 mill gross sales revenue per acre for stick frame construction. The taller the pringles can the lower the benchmark pricing.
usctrojanman29 said:Why do they need to make $7-7.5 million in gross sales per acre? Weren't they doing find when they were making 50% of that 7-8 years ago? What changed? Kool-aid induced withdrawls?bkshopr said:irvine_home_owner said:So instead of BagOChips... it's more like CanOPringles? Not only do they stack high... but you can fit at least 3 of them into the space a BagOChips takes.usctrojanman29 said:Yup, that's the way to get to that magical $375 mark...just stack'em and pack'em (get the sardine picture out). If TIC builds them, the sheople will come. hahabkshopr said:Like I said: "Bag of Chips" theory is the most applicable to the triplex set-up. You knew that already before the mail.
$375x90%=$338/sf By adding more chips may disguise the value ratio to $310/sf.
Man! You guys are getting this concept quick. The Pringles can takes up less shelf space and more chips to a can. Higher density and more footage is the key to disguise benchmark pricing. Ultimately TIC needs $7-7.5 mill gross sales revenue per acre for stick frame construction. The taller the pringles can the lower the benchmark pricing.
So you think they will widen Vintage then to allow for parking in front of the homes...?PadreBrian said:They will face the main streets and their garages will be on a yet unmade alley in the middle.
I also recommend next year finding an interior facing apartment.
Aqua Bliss said:I live in the Treo units directly across the street from this empty lot and I didn't even receive this mail... interesting.
This brings an interesting question about the layout of these triplexes. Do you think the front of the homes will face Vintage? Seems like this is the only way they could do it but there isn't enough room on that side of Vintage to allow parking so they will either have to widen that whole street, or but a big ugly wall up and make that the alley, which probably isn't an option. Sounds like they will be widening the street.
Just what I need, residents of 99 more units peeling out at the 4-way stop on Vintage and Long Meadow waking me up in the middle of the night. Thanks a million TIC.
roundcorners said:Aqua Bliss said:I live in the Treo units directly across the street from this empty lot and I didn't even receive this mail... interesting.
This brings an interesting question about the layout of these triplexes. Do you think the front of the homes will face Vintage? Seems like this is the only way they could do it but there isn't enough room on that side of Vintage to allow parking so they will either have to widen that whole street, or but a big ugly wall up and make that the alley, which probably isn't an option. Sounds like they will be widening the street.
Just what I need, residents of 99 more units peeling out at the 4-way stop on Vintage and Long Meadow waking me up in the middle of the night. Thanks a million TIC.
can you imagine when all those affordable rental units come on-line? Woodbury just feel about right with the amount of traffic and pedestrians; you can still accommodate for all those Asian drivers who can't follow the signs and figure out which way to turn to go to the open houses... I can't imagine it any more dense!
roundcorners said:Aqua Bliss said:I live in the Treo units directly across the street from this empty lot and I didn't even receive this mail... interesting.
This brings an interesting question about the layout of these triplexes. Do you think the front of the homes will face Vintage? Seems like this is the only way they could do it but there isn't enough room on that side of Vintage to allow parking so they will either have to widen that whole street, or but a big ugly wall up and make that the alley, which probably isn't an option. Sounds like they will be widening the street.
Just what I need, residents of 99 more units peeling out at the 4-way stop on Vintage and Long Meadow waking me up in the middle of the night. Thanks a million TIC.
can you imagine when all those affordable rental units come on-line? Woodbury just feel about right with the amount of traffic and pedestrians; you can still accommodate for all those Asian drivers who can't follow the signs and figure out which way to turn to go to the open houses... I can't imagine it any more dense!
SoCal78 said:Thanks, IAC Renter.
The info sheet on #2 says they will have California Rooms i.e. open-air room with roof... can be utilized as an outdoor patio and for indoor/outdoor purposes. But that makes it sound sound like a covered patio (with the house's roof covering it.) Does anyone know if this would be counted in the square footage of the home? Bk, maybe you would know.
Actually... I've already done that in the past a few times.bkshopr said:In the future you might say "Frontal 3CG is really ugly".
irvine_home_owner said:Actually... I've already done that in the past a few times.bkshopr said:In the future you might say "Frontal 3CG is really ugly".
I know that aesthetically it's not the best... but I also accept that space/cost/function is why it's so prevalent.
Space permitting, I would prefer some type of rear-garage type arrangement but the access should be from the front... I'm not a fan of alley-style neighborhoods.
And those big front yards in FP look nice and all... but I would rather reduce that to either add more house space or more backyard space.