irvinehomeowner
Well-known member
When I read this in the paper I was mad:
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/tunnel-264010-project-toll.html
You can pay me $8mil to tell you that a tunnel under a national forest is a bad idea.
I can't believe how much money is wasted on stuff like this. And what is the 241 for? You can't travel those extra few miles on the 91 that you have to carve a tunnel in earthquake country? Why not just build next to the 91 or on top of it? Continue the 241 over, extend the Expressway and connect to it. I bet that would cost way less than the $28bil just to start the project. In fact, you could probably do it for less than you're paying to just think about it. Ugh.
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/tunnel-264010-project-toll.html
You can pay me $8mil to tell you that a tunnel under a national forest is a bad idea.
I can't believe how much money is wasted on stuff like this. And what is the 241 for? You can't travel those extra few miles on the 91 that you have to carve a tunnel in earthquake country? Why not just build next to the 91 or on top of it? Continue the 241 over, extend the Expressway and connect to it. I bet that would cost way less than the $28bil just to start the project. In fact, you could probably do it for less than you're paying to just think about it. Ugh.