Irvine Company acting as Big Brother
- Thread starter Irvinecommuter
- Start date
irvinehomeowner
Well-known member
Mety said:
Pidgin-fixed.
irvinehomeowner
Well-known member
Mety said:
And you say I'm too serious.
Chill out brah... no need fo stress.
Loco_local
Active member
Fashion Island, Spectrum and Marketplace
they say they're not selling info to data companies. yeah right
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-irvine-company-license-plates-20180711-story.html
they say they're not selling info to data companies. yeah right
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-irvine-company-license-plates-20180711-story.html
?Update 7/11/18 12:15PM: When reached for comment, The Irvine Company's chief communications officer Scott Starkey provided this statement on its behalf:
"Irvine Company is a customer of Vigilant Solutions. Vigilant employs ALPR technology at our three Orange County regional shopping centers. Vigilant is required by contract, and have assured us, that ALPR data collected at these locations is only shared with local police departments as part of their efforts to keep the local community safe."
Starkey also provided a statement from Irvine Police Department spokesperson Kim Mohr, which stated that IPD uses data legally collected by ALPR setups for its own investigations and never shares the information.?
https://www.engadget.com/2018/07/10/california-mall-scan-license-plate-database-ice-/
"Irvine Company is a customer of Vigilant Solutions. Vigilant employs ALPR technology at our three Orange County regional shopping centers. Vigilant is required by contract, and have assured us, that ALPR data collected at these locations is only shared with local police departments as part of their efforts to keep the local community safe."
Starkey also provided a statement from Irvine Police Department spokesperson Kim Mohr, which stated that IPD uses data legally collected by ALPR setups for its own investigations and never shares the information.?
https://www.engadget.com/2018/07/10/california-mall-scan-license-plate-database-ice-/
fortune11 said:
Doesn't California have a law that requires business to post a notice that they are recording video of you? Why wouldn't this apply to recording your license plate? How many thousands of people go to those centers every day? Ambulance chasers ? start your engines!
Happiness said:
I can almost guarantee you that company alpr is selling this data somewhere else - to companies that want to track consumer behavior
Btw in my mgmt consulting job , I have been offered payroll data (yes , payroll data ) by companies like adp . They think it?s fine as long as they anonymize the socials , but imagine that . It just takes one bug (intentional or otherwise ) in the software code to go from ?anonymous data solution? to a full on data breach disaster circus that ultimately ends in ceos getting fired from boards and congressional hearings .
nosuchreality
Well-known member
Fortune, its been my experience that 99% of corporate users are just unconcious of data risk. They're stupid about the data they ask for, they're stupid about the data they collect, they're stupid about how they use it and transmit it and just plain old lazy and oblivious to securing it.
The number of corporate users downlaoding information to their laptop and then emailing it around is insane. If you key them about it they're cognizant when having a discussion on it, but oblivious when working and so unaware of what data they have or are requesting.
The number of corporate users downlaoding information to their laptop and then emailing it around is insane. If you key them about it they're cognizant when having a discussion on it, but oblivious when working and so unaware of what data they have or are requesting.