Oscar said:If a bankruptcy filing qualifies as a credit event that results in a payout on the credit default swaps written for their bonds, then Congress will sign off on the loans the automakers are requesting. Ironically, this may cause the cascading effect that Ben and Hank sought to stave off with the AIG & Wall Street bailouts.
I suspect that more than a few people are waiting/hoping/counting on Obama to perform a miracle and turn things around over night. I think when it becomes clear that not even he has the power to reverse this, we will see the kind of panic and capitulation in the general population that hasn't really materialized yet.skek said:Indeed, but a GM bankruptcy would be equivalent to a run on a bank in the public's eye, many of whom are still not paying attention and figures the government will "fix" this. I suspect it weakens consumer confidence, further suppresses consumer spending and generally provokes the next step down in the death spiral.
skek said:WINEX said:I think a lot of perception is based on whether any bankruptcy was a liquidation versus a reorganization.
In reality, that makes all the difference in the world. But I'm not sure the public perceives a difference. If the front page of the OC Register says "GM, Chrysler File for Bankruptcy" then regardless of whether it is a pre-pack, a DIP or a liquidation, I think the average man or woman on the street (1) buys fewer Christmas presents, (2) doesn't buy that car they thought they might get, and (3) has a talk with the spouse about less dinners out and tucking a little more away for a rainy day.
There's nothing technical or scientific about my opinion, just a hunch...
skek said:You could be right -- again, I'm just relaying a hunch. But you kind of made my point. Americans are used to seeing airlines in bankruptcy. BK is part of their business model. But when was the last time we've seen a car company in BK? You'd have to go back to the Chrysler bailout in the 80s for a close comparison. So a car company BK would be different. And, given that most Americans know that the government is considering a bailout of the auto industry, wouldn't a BK indicate that, to some degree, the government couldn't "save" GM or Chrylser?
But, you could be right. I just wonder what piece of news is going to finally make the point that this is serious to the average American. What do you think might do it?
skek said:You could be right -- again, I'm just relaying a hunch. But you kind of made my point. Americans are used to seeing airlines in bankruptcy. BK is part of their business model. But when was the last time we've seen a car company in BK? You'd have to go back to the Chrysler bailout in the 80s for a close comparison. So a car company BK would be different. And, given that most Americans know that the government is considering a bailout of the auto industry, wouldn't a BK indicate that, to some degree, the government couldn't "save" GM or Chrylser?
But, you could be right. I just wonder what piece of news is going to finally make the point that this is serious to the average American. What do you think might do it?
acpme said:UAW finally gave some concessions. they agreed that if you're laid off, you won't get to continue collecting 95% of your paycheck. it's outrageous that people who lose their jobs should also lose their paychecks too. i mean, what are they going to do next -- take away our homes when we don't pay our mortgage?!
"Everybody has to give a little bit," said Rich Bennett, an official for Local 122 in Twinsburg, Ohio, representing Chrysler workers. "We've made concessions. We really feel we're doing our part."