How Peter Navarro could lead us into a global depression?or worse

Loco_local

Active member
The Most Dangerous Man in Trump World?
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/02/peter-navarro-trump-trade-china-214772

Amid all the fretting about what diktats or foreign wars Miller, Bannon and Flynn might be concocting, one figure only intermittently flickers into public consciousness: Peter Navarro, the head of Trump?s National Trade Council. But it would be a costly mistake to short sell his influence. He sports some establishment credentials?most notably, a Harvard Ph.D. in economics?but his views are quite radical. He may, in fact, be the loopiest member of Trump?s retinue.

He has a long and colorful history of China-bashing (just check out his bizarre scaremongering documentaries), which makes Chinese officials nervous. He seems to think that every one of Chinese economic successes comes at U.S. expense.

He?s a zero-sum economist, who, like Trump, believes that every item not made in the U.S. represents the theft of an American job.

Particularly disturbing is Navarro?s fearmongering about war with Beijing. China?s aspirations are so insatiable, he claims, that eventually there will be a clash over ?our most basic of all needs?bread, water, and air.

To counter the manifold economic and military threats the United States faces, Navarro recommends a sweeping revision of U.S. foreign policy. He wants high tariffs, the repudiation of trade pacts and, above all, a massive military buildup against China.

The hysterical economic warnings, the scary prescriptions and the self-defeating proposals would simply be fanciful nonsense if Navarro weren?t whispering in the ear of the most powerful man in the world. The fact that he is makes them dangerous.

 
Loco_local said:
The Most Dangerous Man in Trump World?
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/02/peter-navarro-trump-trade-china-214772

Amid all the fretting about what diktats or foreign wars Miller, Bannon and Flynn might be concocting, one figure only intermittently flickers into public consciousness: Peter Navarro, the head of Trump?s National Trade Council. But it would be a costly mistake to short sell his influence. He sports some establishment credentials?most notably, a Harvard Ph.D. in economics?but his views are quite radical. He may, in fact, be the loopiest member of Trump?s retinue.

He has a long and colorful history of China-bashing (just check out his bizarre scaremongering documentaries), which makes Chinese officials nervous. He seems to think that every one of Chinese economic successes comes at U.S. expense.

He?s a zero-sum economist, who, like Trump, believes that every item not made in the U.S. represents the theft of an American job.

Particularly disturbing is Navarro?s fearmongering about war with Beijing. China?s aspirations are so insatiable, he claims, that eventually there will be a clash over ?our most basic of all needs?bread, water, and air.

To counter the manifold economic and military threats the United States faces, Navarro recommends a sweeping revision of U.S. foreign policy. He wants high tariffs, the repudiation of trade pacts and, above all, a massive military buildup against China.

The hysterical economic warnings, the scary prescriptions and the self-defeating proposals would simply be fanciful nonsense if Navarro weren?t whispering in the ear of the most powerful man in the world. The fact that he is makes them dangerous.

"Zero sum" defines his whole ideology perfectly.
 
Who else would you expect Trump to hire. He campaigned on an adversarial relationship with China (which i agree with). We need stronger leadership when dealing with the Chinese (something they respect).  He needs to have a wartime conciliary. Besides I would think you guys would love this guy...he's an elite, Ivy league Democrat.
 
...For 2016 Election, Europhile Trump was Moscow's preferred candidate and Snake-oil Clinton was Beijing's preferred candidate.

Had Clinton been elected you'd see advisers yelling for military build-up in Europe against Russia today -- and Russia still has far more nukes than China.
 
If the Chinese Communist Party has no respect for us (tariffs, quotas, theft of IP, etc) why should we respect them?  We should treat others as they treat us.  If others treat us poorly, we should treat them poorly.

During Deng's time there was a thought in this country that if we treated the Chinese Communists with great warmth and friendship, they would want to be more like us.  Forty years later, the behavior of the Chinese Communists have not improved a bit.  I say we try something new.
 
During Deng era the goal was to use the "China card" against the USSR.  No permanent friends and no permanent enemies here, only permanent self-interests.  However, it's assumed that a government or its rulers would at least look after its own citizen's interests, something that the CCP does not respect by catering to the globalist cabal.

The most recent example is downgrading the goal of 95% self sufficient in grains to "domestic supply with moderate imports", then further to "food security through active utilization of international food market".

In 3 decades they have gone from breaking the iron rice bowl to putting their own citizen's food security at the mercy of international food shortages and disruptions during wartime.  Xi Jinping the sock puppet went to land of Swiss bank accounts to claim that China (and what remains of EU) will lead the way to globalization?  Perhaps it's time for a reprint of "The European Dream" with a few major propaganda edits.
 
Back
Top