The California Court Company said:Plus the disgusting election material that masks itself as Irvine community news. It is fake news and only promotes Larry and his cronies.
yaliu07 said:I read from other thread that people are complaining about over development.
1. what's wrong with over development? With more house, I think there will be more shopping malls, restaurants, supermarkets and MORE TAX to the city.
2. Assume Gaido/Agran won the election? Can they stop 10000 new house development in GP?
yaliu07 said:I read from other thread that people are complaining about over development.
1. what's wrong with over development? With more house, I think there will be more shopping malls, restaurants, supermarkets and MORE TAX to the city.
2. Assume Gaido/Agran won the election? Can they stop 10000 new house development in GP?
paperboyNC said:yaliu07 said:I read from other thread that people are complaining about over development.
1. what's wrong with over development? With more house, I think there will be more shopping malls, restaurants, supermarkets and MORE TAX to the city.
2. Assume Gaido/Agran won the election? Can they stop 10000 new house development in GP?
So we should build as many homes on as much land as possible as quickly as possible with no limits on anything?
Irvinecommuter said:yaliu07 said:I read from other thread that people are complaining about over development.
1. what's wrong with over development? With more house, I think there will be more shopping malls, restaurants, supermarkets and MORE TAX to the city.
2. Assume Gaido/Agran won the election? Can they stop 10000 new house development in GP?
1) The key phrase is "over." Development is good...over development is not. Irvine actually does a good job of mixing up commercial, residential, and parks/nature. Go to Anaheim and you will see what overdevelopment looks like.
2) Agran was one that approved the 10,000 residential unit plan.
Irvinecommuter said:2) Agran was one that approved the 10,000 residential unit plan.
yaliu07 said:I think you are against over development. However, you didn't state your reason why you againist.
yaliu07 said:Irvinecommuter said:yaliu07 said:I read from other thread that people are complaining about over development.
1. what's wrong with over development? With more house, I think there will be more shopping malls, restaurants, supermarkets and MORE TAX to the city.
2. Assume Gaido/Agran won the election? Can they stop 10000 new house development in GP?
1) The key phrase is "over." Development is good...over development is not. Irvine actually does a good job of mixing up commercial, residential, and parks/nature. Go to Anaheim and you will see what overdevelopment looks like.
2) Agran was one that approved the 10,000 residential unit plan.
1. How many new house is consider "development"? How many new house is consider "over development"? For the 10000 new house in GP and new PP, Irvine add 680+ acre of sports park.
2. Thanks for the info. I dont like Agran either. He approved the plan and now he is against...
eyephone said:I'm just thinking: how many people on TI will vote? I'm leaning towards not a lot.
Due to: don't want to miss work (even though by law your employer should give you time to vote), not eligible (on visa, illegal), don't care (don't bother me/I have other things to do)