Covid 19 Vaccines kill

NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
Just as I and many others were saying…another that after the fact is proven correct (by the science) but we knew to be true at the time..🤦🏽‍♂️😡👎🏽🦄🌈

CDC study shows there is no scientific rationale for vaccine mandates for kids attending school​

Not that science will change anything, but people who think they are "saving lives" with vaccine mandates for kids to attend school are both delusional and anti-science.​

kirschsubstack.com

CDC study shows there is no scientific rationale for vaccine mandates for kids attending school

Not that science will change anything, but people who think they are "saving lives" with vaccine mandates for kids to attend school are both delusional and anti-science.
kirschsubstack.com kirschsubstack.com
 
The COVID-19 vaccines saved millions of lives during the pandemic by preventing severe illness, hospitalization, and death
. Studies have consistently demonstrated that vaccination is highly effective at reducing the risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes, particularly for the most vulnerable populations.

Global and national impact
  • Millions of lives saved: Multiple studies confirm that COVID-19 vaccination saved millions of lives worldwide.
    • An analysis of the first year of vaccination, from December 2020 to December 2021, estimated that it prevented between 14.4 million and 19.8 million deaths globally.
    • A more conservative study published in July 2025, covering December 2020 through October 2024, estimated 2.5 million deaths were prevented globally. This study showed the largest impact was on the elderly and during the Omicron variant phase.
  • Reduced mortality: National data also confirm the life-saving impact of vaccines. For example, a study using data through May 2021 estimated that COVID-19 vaccines prevented nearly 140,000 deaths in the United States alone.
  • Protection against severe disease: A meta-analysis of real-world studies published in 2021 found that for fully vaccinated individuals, vaccine effectiveness was 99% against COVID-19-related death and over 97% against hospitalization and ICU admission.
Who benefited the most?
Vaccines provided the most significant protection for the elderly and those with underlying health conditions, who were at the highest risk for severe outcomes from COVID-19.
  • Older adults: A 2025 study found that people aged 60 and older accounted for nearly 90% of the estimated lives saved between 2020 and 2024.
  • High-risk populations: Research on high-risk individuals, such as heart failure patients, showed that vaccinated individuals had significantly lower rates of hospitalization, ICU admission, and death compared to their unvaccinated counterparts.
 
There does not seem to be a conflict here:
morekaos said:
CDC study shows there is no scientific rationale for vaccine mandates for kids attending school
Click to expand...
iacrenter said:
Who benefited the most?
Vaccines provided the most significant protection for the elderly and those with underlying health conditions, who were at the highest risk for severe outcomes from COVID-19.
  • Older adults: A 2025 study found that people aged 60 and older accounted for nearly 90% of the estimated lives saved between 2020 and 2024.
  • High-risk populations: Research on high-risk individuals, such as heart failure patients, showed that vaccinated individuals had significantly lower rates of hospitalization, ICU admission, and death compared to their unvaccinated counterparts.
Click to expand...
 
I asked if kids could carry covid 19 and give it to their adult guardians.
That answer is yes, but most adults were giving it to each other. Not the kids because they mostly had no symptoms.

So having symptoms (like coughing) causes more spread.
 
But would tangelo claim credit for curing cancer?

And would he instruct Russel Vaught not cut the NIH budget by 50%? Or he is just happy living off the investment of earlier taxpayers in better science/healthcare?
 
freedomcm said:
But would tangelo claim credit for curing cancer?

And would he instruct Russel Vaught not cut the NIH budget by 50%? Or he is just happy living off the investment of earlier taxpayers in better science/healthcare?
Click to expand...
Earlier tax payers had nothing to do with it. Our country is $38,000,000,000,000 in debt so the government money thrown into the pharmaceutical company coffers came from lenders to the US Treasury that expect to be paid back.

Pfizer spiked by 90% in less than two years only to lose 60% of value since then.

1761769490501.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top