Mcdonna1980 said:Found this in the comments:
CR writes: ...that first house is at 721 Narcissus CA 92625 and is listed for $2.4 million... They are asking $5,000 a month for a lease.
Anyone else here do the same math that I just did, and come out with the same conclusion that something is way out-of-whack here?
GRM ouch!
IrvineRenter said:Mcdonna1980 said:Found this in the comments:
CR writes: ...that first house is at 721 Narcissus CA 92625 and is listed for $2.4 million... They are asking $5,000 a month for a lease.
Anyone else here do the same math that I just did, and come out with the same conclusion that something is way out-of-whack here?
GRM ouch!
This is one of the reasons I now believe the beach communities are going to see 65%-70% price declines.
IrvineRenter said:Mcdonna1980 said:Found this in the comments:
CR writes: ...that first house is at 721 Narcissus CA 92625 and is listed for $2.4 million... They are asking $5,000 a month for a lease.
Anyone else here do the same math that I just did, and come out with the same conclusion that something is way out-of-whack here?
GRM ouch!
This is one of the reasons I now believe the beach communities are going to see 65%-70% price declines.
graphrix said:IrvineRenter said:Mcdonna1980 said:Found this in the comments:
CR writes: ...that first house is at 721 Narcissus CA 92625 and is listed for $2.4 million... They are asking $5,000 a month for a lease.
Anyone else here do the same math that I just did, and come out with the same conclusion that something is way out-of-whack here?
GRM ouch!
This is one of the reasons I now believe the beach communities are going to see 65%-70% price declines.
No... no... the high end is immune! I mean, the 200% increase in NODs is just a seasonal blip, most of them have the money to pay their loans off in cash, or they will get loan mods. At least that is what the moron brigade tells me over at Lansner's blog. Really, they are f*cked.
http://i41.tinypic.com/24zvpj9.jpg
And to confirm that even original owners are not immune, this place in Newport was picked up at the auction today for $305k. They owed $81k, and their prop taxes were $937 a year. Kinda sad actually. Even if it is a tear down, at that price you are looking at $100-$200k in profit. If you don't tear it down, $400k profit no problem. I am seeing a lot more deals in Newport at the auction, CDM included. Which proves Dimmy is a fake, and just likes to rile up the bears.
Maltese said:How the heck did that one go for only $350K at auction? That makes no sense, given the lower price homes in Westcliff/Dover Shores area have been selling relatively briskly in the 850K range. Even as land value it would fetch at least 650K, would it not? Something doesnt jive.
IrvineRenter said:Mcdonna1980 said:Found this in the comments:
CR writes: ...that first house is at 721 Narcissus CA 92625 and is listed for $2.4 million... They are asking $5,000 a month for a lease.
Anyone else here do the same math that I just did, and come out with the same conclusion that something is way out-of-whack here?
GRM ouch!
This is one of the reasons I now believe the beach communities are going to see 65%-70% price declines.
Maltese said:graphrix said:IrvineRenter said:Mcdonna1980 said:Found this in the comments:
CR writes: ...that first house is at 721 Narcissus CA 92625 and is listed for $2.4 million... They are asking $5,000 a month for a lease.
Anyone else here do the same math that I just did, and come out with the same conclusion that something is way out-of-whack here?
GRM ouch!
This is one of the reasons I now believe the beach communities are going to see 65%-70% price declines.
No... no... the high end is immune! I mean, the 200% increase in NODs is just a seasonal blip, most of them have the money to pay their loans off in cash, or they will get loan mods. At least that is what the moron brigade tells me over at Lansner's blog. Really, they are f*cked.
http://i41.tinypic.com/24zvpj9.jpg
And to confirm that even original owners are not immune, this place in Newport was picked up at the auction today for $305k. They owed $81k, and their prop taxes were $937 a year. Kinda sad actually. Even if it is a tear down, at that price you are looking at $100-$200k in profit. If you don't tear it down, $400k profit no problem. I am seeing a lot more deals in Newport at the auction, CDM included. Which proves Dimmy is a fake, and just likes to rile up the bears.
How the heck did that one go for only $350K at auction? That makes no sense, given the lower price homes in Westcliff/Dover Shores area have been selling relatively briskly in the 850K range. Even as land value it would fetch at least 650K, would it not? Something doesnt jive.
I'd be the first in line to buy a fixer over there if it was around $300k with 20% down. I'd say a 1,300 to 1,600 sf home would be perfect for me.freedomCM said:Wow, that Beryl house is an amazing deal. even if it needed some fix-up, similar houses have been going in the 800s, as Maltese said. And those that have been pergranteeled over the past few years are still hitting the 900s-1000s.
Of course, that whole neighborhood was in the 300s during the 90s, so maybe that is where they will be again in a year or two, and you won't need all cash.
stepping_up said:nevermind, I see that they call it a preview. It would be nice to see them all just to know the quantity not necessarily the specific address.
how come when you search a zip on FR using the free function there are only a fraction of the number of balls as Graph gets? I put in 92625 and only about 20 come up.
Mcdonna1980 said:Will renting be the undoing of home prices?
What has been lost in the review of home buying and renting habits is that some people who own a home will decide never to buy one again. The reaction to losing so much money on what is the largest investment many people will ever have will be, in many cases that they will not come back to the real estate market again. People who have suffered through anxious months not knowing if they will be able to pay their mortgages may decide that it is not an experience they want to repeat.
Renting was considered a fool’s way of living just a decade ago. A renter could not get equity in a property like the one that his homeowner friends had. A new house could double in value in ten years, offering the owner ready access to capital, a way to educate children and pay for vacations. With very few people willing to believe that those benefits are still a part of owning a home, the incentives to buy one have dwindled.
wardp said:I didn't see the Beryl house on fidelityasap.com. Does anyone know when it sold or if there was any "story" with the house? That does seem EXTREMELY cheap.
stepping_up said:nevermind, I see that they call it a preview. It would be nice to see them all just to know the quantity not necessarily the specific address.
how come when you search a zip on FR using the free function there are only a fraction of the number of balls as Graph gets? I put in 92625 and only about 20 come up.