First and foremost, I hope you understand that I am not trying to challenge you like I have in the past or like you are some bull trolling for business, but that I see you as a level headed IHBer who has taken the advice of myself and many others like me. I know you are a smart guy, and you have proven that by selling your condo and by trading the way that you have. I am just trying to give you the same advice I would in the trading thread, and like you have mentioned selling too early on stocks/options, I think you are buying too early here. From your post, I feel like you are trying to convince and justify to yourself this is a good investment, because you are not convincing me. Allow me to explain...
[quote author="usctrojanman29" date=1227366400]I understand that it looks ugly out there in terms of foreclosures, but I hardly doubt the condo in this complex will trade at less than $40 per square foot. What is your prediction of where prices bottom in Vegas? You do realize that Vegas began the downturn early like the IE so it will most likely find the bottom before Irvine finds bottom.</blockquote>
I disagree.
1. Just because the downturn started sooner in Vegas doesn't mean that it will recover sooner. They had a much higher run up, and the fundamentals were never ever there, and three times as worse than OC. As history has shown us, the OC market takes longer to fall and doesn't fall as hard as markets like Vegas or Peenix. Go look at the stats from the 90s, the spreads were much, much higher in Vegas and Peenix, and they are and will be again.
2. Foreclosures continue to increase in Vegas, and NODs continue to increase in Vegas. The velocity of both have not changed and it continues to be on the same pace.
3. I don't know what price or when the bottom will be, but stabilization will be the indicator that it has arrived. Judging by point #2, it isn't here yet, and it is no where near in sight. I do know, that I will be able to pick up a condo like this in the same complex as this, but it will have a higher positive cash flow at $850 a month than you will have. Why? Fundamentals and history have said so, and will say so again.
<blockquote>The reason it got hammered early, even before the carnage in the IE, was because it was the home of the flippers. I'm sure you know better than I do that it's the investment home keys that get thrown back to the bank first before primary residence keys get thrown back to the bank.</blockquote>
True, but you are not taking into account the effect flippers have on buyers who drank the Kool-Aid, and the continued increases in NODs and foreclosures confirm this. It is not getting better, it is getting worse. Think of the flippers like cancer, now the disease is spreading to all parts of the market. Those that have savings are still hanging on, but now even they are losing their jobs. And what do you think will happen to them? Where will they get jobs, the casinos?...
<blockquote>I will agree with you on one thing, if the casinos do implode and close up shop then prices will go below $50/sf but I don't see that happening. Gaming revenues are off 10% from last year, not 50%.</blockquote>
Gaming revenues off 10% is like OC seeing a 25% drop in jobs of the professional and business services sector. Consider that leisure and hospitality account for more than 1/3rd of the jobs in Vegas, and you add in construction jobs to account for nearly half of all the jobs in Vegas, then with all the cut backs, where the f*ck are these people going to work? Come on my friend... this isn't calculating the Theta on an option contract, this is the first couple of chapters of econ 101. This is not something, someone as intelligent as you have proven yourself to be, buys into. I just did your homework for you, and while that may have worked for you at SC, it ain't gonna work here. Next time I will send you a bill, and if you don't pay up, I will send Ipo to go all 909 on you to collect.