No_Such_Reality_IHB
New member
Long live the Republic!
Brutus where forth art thou?
Brutus where forth art thou?
awgee said:No Vas - Part of his plan is to reinstate the vehicle license fees.
$12 increase in annual vehicle registration fees.
skek said:(He earned my vote for Governor during the recall election and certainly would have done a better job that Arnold.)
EvaLSeraphim said:skek said:(He earned my vote for Governor during the recall election and certainly would have done a better job that Arnold.)
Vas, I need to borrow your pic Hell freezing over. Skek and I voted for the same guy at the same time. Different reasons, but still...
skek said:Eva gets an extra thank-you because she posted first.
I'm curious, Eva, why did you vote for McClintock for Governor?
skek said:Eva gets an extra thank-you because she posted first.
I'm curious, Eva, why did you vote for McClintock for Governor?
Nude said:You could start with scrapping that ridiculous process for allowing a direct connection between the voter and the law known as the ballot initiative. Despite popular opinion, this country was set up as a federal republic to avoid the exact kind of short-sighted stupidity embodied in Props 13, 98, and now 8.skek said:California is broke. We need to tear it up and start over. Everything should be on the table.
Sadly, we need a charismatic bipartisan leader to steward the revolution -- someone who commands a firm mandate from the people, someone who can scare the crap out of the career politicians in Sacramento. Anyone see any contenders? I don't.
The fact that every single bond measure on the ballot wasn't beaten by 40% (and that a couple actually passed) is an indicator to me that Californians don't yet realize how badly we've mismanaged the state.
Edited to appease the numbers nazi
EvaLSeraphim said:Nude said:You could start with scrapping that ridiculous process for allowing a direct connection between the voter and the law known as the ballot initiative. Despite popular opinion, this country was set up as a federal republic to avoid the exact kind of short-sighted stupidity embodied in Props 13, 98, and now 8.skek said:California is broke. We need to tear it up and start over. Everything should be on the table.
Sadly, we need a charismatic bipartisan leader to steward the revolution -- someone who commands a firm mandate from the people, someone who can scare the crap out of the career politicians in Sacramento. Anyone see any contenders? I don't.
The fact that every single bond measure on the ballot wasn't beaten by 40% (and that a couple actually passed) is an indicator to me that Californians don't yet realize how badly we've mismanaged the state.
Edited to appease the numbers nazi
Nude, I have very bad news for you on that front.
skek said:California is broke. We need to tear it up and start over. Everything should be on the table.
skek said:EvaLSeraphim said:I'm kinda surprised you didn't vote for Schwarzie. You kind of struck me as a New Majority type.
Nope, I was leery of Arnold, even when it was clear that it was him or Cruz. (Eva, you have my eternal respect for at least drawing the line at voting for Cruz "I'm qualified to be insurance commissioner because I lost weight" Bustamante.) Funny that WINEX mentioned Gary Coleman. During the recall campaign, I asked a fellow Republican to explain to me the substantive differences in their qualifications such that one was getting millions in PAC money and the other was a bad punchline. In return, I got "married to Maria Shriver" and "President's Council on Physical Fitness." I also got "he's our only chance." Be careful what you wish for.
Republicans are conservatives, and conservatism is based on certain ideals. When someone doesn't understand or embrace those ideals and yet governs as a Republican, he or she can do great damage to the party's perception in the public. See, e.g., George W. Bush, Republican Congress (2000-2006) and Gov. Arnold Schwarzeneger.
Nothing against New Majority, though. A fine organization. But they have adopted a "do what we can to win" mentality in California, and that means supporting RINOs from time to time. I'd rather lose on principle. And in the end, I don't think conservative ideals necessarily have to lose in California.
stepping_up said:freedomCM said:you forgot, he could cut schools too. they are half of the budget.
sure, laying off lots of teachers isn't popular, and will increase the ranks of the unemployed.
of course, i'm sure you can find lots of 'waste and abuse' in the typical schools budget. just cut that.
They are cutting the schools. My husband works with school districts and he's really worried about them and this is a guy who says I'm the liberal in the house, i.e. who's bumbling the money. One thing that many people don't realize is how much it costs to educate the special needs kids. The typical kid costs 6K-10K per year to educate, the special needs kids are often $60K and can be as high as $100K. The law states that every child is entitled to an education and the district has to provide it. In the poorer districts there are an even higher percentage of these special needs kids.
If they do their paperwork right, the Federal gov't covers half, but that's still a lot for the districts to pick up. If they don't do the paperwork, or do it right, then it's 100% their cost.
skek said:Sadly, we need a charismatic bipartisan leader to steward the revolution -- someone who commands a firm mandate from the people, someone who can scare the crap out of the career politicians in Sacramento. Anyone see any contenders? I don't.
skek said:Sadly, we need a charismatic bipartisan leader to steward the revolution -- someone who commands a firm mandate from the people, someone who can scare the crap out of the career politicians in Sacramento. Anyone see any contenders? I don't.