paperboyNC said:
Soylent Green Is People said:
Agreed. Fun times when people like you that are otherwise fairly rational are diehard supporters of a president who has lied over 20,000 times. But as long as you agree with the pathological liar, it's all good, right? I'm not a Democrat or Republican as I've swung back and forth between elections, but even I can see that Trump is the worst president of all time. If we had rational voters, he'd lose 95% to 1%
Just the accusation of the accusation is a lie....never ending hilarity and tail chasing...
No, Trump Hasn't Made 20,000 'False or Misleading' Claims
Indeed, per The Washington Post fact-checker database, President Trump has told 20,000 ?false and misleading? claims through July 9 of this year ? an astonishing average of nearly 16 false or misleading statements a day. Framed in those terms, Stelter has a point. Choosing between the credibility of Trump or, say, a CNN host, the editor of a prestige magazine such as The Atlantic, let alone a Washington Post fact-checker, is no choice at all.
The problem is that any cursory inspection of the Post database reveals that the idea that Trump has told 20,000 ?false or misleading? statements is itself false and misleading. Vast quantities of the 20,000 are redundancies ? statements, however tendentious, that Trump has repeated ad nauseum. More problematic is that thousands of statements The Washington Post labels as untrue or misleading are more properly considered the habitual verbal excess for a man known for his immoderate form of communication. Further, a great many of the Post?s objections to Trump?s statements amount to argumentative quibbles that aren?t really ?fact checks.?
Just to start, here?s one of Trump?s most oft-repeated ?lies,? according to Washington Post fact checkers: ?My job was made harder by phony witch hunts, by ?Russia, Russia, Russia? nonsense.? The Post dings Trump for some variation of this claim 227 times ? more than 1% of Trump?s alleged untruths. Yet, the Post?s justification for why Trump is wrong to say this is pure pettifogging.
Much of it essentially consists of a defense of the probe conducted by special prosecutor Robert Mueller. However, the most tangible results from the Mueller investigation ? criminal charges for Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort for unrelated work in Ukraine and fecklessly charging (and then quietly dropping the charges) against a bunch of Russian nationals for hacking and other dirty computer tricks ? don?t come close to proving Trump colluded with Russia to steal an election.
[url]https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2020/09/10/no_trump_hasnt_made_20000_false_or_misleading_claims.html[/url]