sleepy5136
Well-known member
I’m very confused on why this needs to go to court. I think it should be quite easy to pull up the documents to vet whether there was mortgage fraud or not from Cook.
How low can we go? 30 yr fixed at 3.75% with no fees...
- Thread starter ps99472
- Start date
NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
We live in the age of blame shifting. It's not me. It's "a paperwork error" or "an innocent mistake". An honorable person would have taken the hit and quietly moved out of the spotlight. Lisa Cook is not that person.
Remember dear reader that in our world today... Personal responsibility, just like taxes, are only for little people.....
en.m.wikipedia.org
“Let me just sort of try to bottom line it,” Honig said. “There’s three properties, okay. Within a two-week stretch, she purchases, she gets a mortgage on a place in Michigan and says that’s her principal residence. Two weeks later, she gets a mortgage on a place in Atlanta in Georgia and says that’s her primary residence. And now there’s a third place in Cambridge that she said was her secondary residence, but she’s actually renting it out.”
Why does this matter? Honig explained that claiming multiple properties as primary residences can yield enormous financial benefits. “Because you get better interest rates. Because you get better tax benefits, that can be worth tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars,” he said.
pjmedia.com
CalBears96
Well-known member
I'm refinancing my 5.875% 7/6 ARM to 5.375% 7/6 ARM, using the $1M relationship program, which knocked off 0.5%, same as what I did when I closed escrow last July.
sgip
Well-known member
We live in the age of blame shifting. It's not me. It's "a paperwork error" or "an innocent mistake". An honorable person would have taken the hit and quietly moved out of the spotlight. Lisa Cook is not that person.
Remember dear reader that in our world today... Personal responsibility, just like taxes, are only for little people.....
Leona Helmsley - Wikipedia
sleepy5136
Well-known member
I would be shocked if they do not have evidence of Cook committing mortgage fraud and publicly calling her out for doing so. It sounds like Cook is trying to save face at this point by "suing" the government which I think is a joke and a waste of tax paying dollars.We live in the age of blame shifting. It's not me. It's "a paperwork error" or "an innocent mistake". An honorable person would have taken the hit and quietly moved out of the spotlight. Lisa Cook is not that person.
Remember dear reader that in our world today... Personal responsibility, just like taxes, are only for little people.....
Leona Helmsley - Wikipedia
morekaos
Well-known member
Even CNN Admits Trump Had Cause to Fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook
According to Honig, Cook purchased three properties in rapid succession under highly questionable circumstances.“Let me just sort of try to bottom line it,” Honig said. “There’s three properties, okay. Within a two-week stretch, she purchases, she gets a mortgage on a place in Michigan and says that’s her principal residence. Two weeks later, she gets a mortgage on a place in Atlanta in Georgia and says that’s her primary residence. And now there’s a third place in Cambridge that she said was her secondary residence, but she’s actually renting it out.”
Why does this matter? Honig explained that claiming multiple properties as primary residences can yield enormous financial benefits. “Because you get better interest rates. Because you get better tax benefits, that can be worth tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars,” he said.
Even CNN Admits Trump Had Cause to Fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook
CNN's Elie Honig argues Trump had valid reasons to fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook amid concerns about her conduct.
pjmedia.com
sleepy5136
Well-known member
So I dug into this a little more and the grey area lies on whether actions committed prior to Cook being in the Fed can be used to get her removed. The alleged mortgage fraud was committed prior to her being in the Fed and not during.
irvinehomeowner
Well-known member
That's getting into some glass housing.
morekaos
Well-known member
This is in essence is what they charged Trump with, lying or exaggerating on an official financial form. In Trump‘s case they said he overinflated pricing in her case she lied about occupancy. In both cases the banks did not complain. It’s difficult for Democrats to cry foul when they’re so proud of the Trump prosecutions. Turnabout is fair play and politics is a Blood sport. This was a brilliant move
Last edited:
irvinehomeowner
Well-known member
Wait... you are contradicting yourself. You are saying both should be scrutinized the same but only one should be kicked out of their position?
morekaos
Well-known member
Not at all..Trump has already been “charged” and “convicted”. But the voters don’t care and elected him anyway. Cook hasn’t even been charged yet but it’s not up to the voters if she keeps her job, convicted or not. It’s up to Trump. That gives him the opening to terminate with “cause”. Voters have no say.
Last edited: