esquire22 said:
esquire22 said:
jmoney74 said:Please use a more reliable source. I think everyone would be concerned.. but should come from another publication that doesn't have an agenda.
hello said:jmoney74 said:Please use a more reliable source. I think everyone would be concerned.. but should come from another publication that doesn't have an agenda.
regardless of the agenda, the fact is that toxic substances have been found at this site. You can draw your own conclusions from that.
jmoney74 said:The site has gone through clean up.
jmoney74 said:Now, if there is more leftover and IUSD plus city officials are Completely ignoring it.. then there is a problem.
jmoney74 said:The article fails to relay any facts.. just pushing out a lot of scare tactics.
jmoney74 said:I'd like to see an OC register article regarding this..
gasman said:This is not a "publication". It's an agenda site backed by local political groups to spread propaganda. Some of the data is likely true, but the spin is strong.
hello said:gasman said:This is not a "publication". It's an agenda site backed by local political groups to spread propaganda. Some of the data is likely true, but the spin is strong.
Agree with the agenda, but there are agendas on both sides of this. If any of this data is "likely true", then there are real problems here in my opinion.
jmoney74 said:Who is the other side?
gasman said:jmoney74 said:Who is the other side?
Talk Irvine. jk >
I have yet to see the "other side" in the media. I believe the "other side" she is referring to are the respective camps moving forward with the project (city of irvine, five points, IUSD, etc.).
iacrenter said:gasman said:jmoney74 said:Who is the other side?
Talk Irvine. jk >
I have yet to see the "other side" in the media. I believe the "other side" she is referring to are the respective camps moving forward with the project (city of irvine, five points, IUSD, etc.).
There is a lot of incentive for the "other side" not to delay the school: pressure to decrease crowding at IUSD, potential sales loss at GP, cost of additional testing / delayed construction.
fishfinder333 said:The fact that the environmental report isn't released to public tells me IUSD has something to hide.
jmoney74 said:iacrenter said:gasman said:jmoney74 said:Who is the other side?
Talk Irvine. jk >
I have yet to see the "other side" in the media. I believe the "other side" she is referring to are the respective camps moving forward with the project (city of irvine, five points, IUSD, etc.).
There is a lot of incentive for the "other side" not to delay the school: pressure to decrease crowding at IUSD, potential sales loss at GP, cost of additional testing / delayed construction.
You mean.. the gubbermint? I suppose.. but why is this the only publication that runs against it? seems like if there is any remote credibility.. OC Register would be all over this.. you would think one investigator would be all over this (be a nice boost in their career).