Hi all--
I've been closely following the Quail Hill Recall controversy.
Here is my blog (just started this weekend):
http://quailhilltony.wordpress.com - I'm against the recall
Here are the blogs of 2 people who support the recall (and are running for positions on the board):
http://ukridge.com(Himanshu Surti's site) -- note, a "Dean H" posted on his blog, is this the Dean running for the board also?
http://www.quailhillrecall.com/(Charlene Sorenson)
I may be biased, but I think I'm trying to provide a fact-based blog ... whereas the pro-recall blogs seem to be pure "yellow journalism"
It's especially interesting, given how bland their candidate statements are.
Currently, I receive emails from 3 parties (directly, or indirectly): Doug, Evan, and a mysterious 3rd-party (who is pro-Doug, but apparently is someone who does not talk to Doug).
I think this is exemplified by the 3 different types of signage that we see in Quail Hill.
--Anthony