IR2 - IMO, it would seem the pay structure for re agents puts their best interest at odds with their client's best interest. Since the pay is not for performance, but rather a closed sale, which may not be in the client's best interest, there seems to be an inherent conflict of interest between the re agent and his/her client.
Without being personal, because very few or none of us actually know you, consider how many re agents are willing to tell a client that it may be best for them to wait a few months or years before they buy or sell? I am not asking about you, but rather the majority of agents. Most of the folks in here realize that if they had taken the advice of 99 out of 100 agents, they would have purchased this year or last and would now have lost most if not all of their equity or even be upside down. All the advice that 'now is a good time to buy' is being proved to be a lode of hooey. And the advisers are losing credibility. How many of the subprime borrowers were egged on by an agent who told them any number of lies about how they could afford a home or how home prices always go up.
The agent's pay structure necessitates a sale. If the buyer is hesitant to pay an amount that the seller is willing to accept, how many times does the agent say, "Hey, maybe we need to look at some less expensive properties."? Honestly, won't most agents tell their clients, "I think the seller may be willing to accept such and such. Or, the ever popular, "The selling agent told me their is another offer coming in today."?
Admit it or not, it is obvious to anyone with half a brain that the commission based on a closed sale pay structure creates a conflict of interest between the agent and his/her client and agents will not hear of any change to their pay structure.
Isn't there some way agents could get paid by the hour, like so many other servicers? Why is that so threatening? Maybe I will open up an re brokerage where the agent is paid by the hour, as is the brokerage.