JVNA said:Polarbecca said:Make sure you find out how much it costs to chip out all the base tile that vintage has to install in order for the occupancy permit to go through if you are going to have some of their products installed and redo some with wood. Or whatever. Or if you choose to have the no flooring option and have your own installed make sure that you find out about all the plumbing stuff because as far as I know when you remove all the toilets etc to install flooring it voids all the Lennar warranties etc. We also looked into the option of having flooring installed outside of Vintage. We were not thrilled with Vintage. And when we finally decided to just go through Vintage because of the huge hassel of having flooring redone we had to approve the tile we ordered before it was installed but we weren't allowed to look at the wood floor before it was installed which made no sense to us.
I thought all new homes had to have flooring installed, even if the cheapest, prior to handing over they keys?
MojoJD said:Wow, last phase sold out of the plan 1/3 pretty quick. Just days, that's with prices up and incentives down.
toph said:question for residents:
did you guys just go with uamc, or find your own lender?
why, or why not?
positives/cons?
thx.
Polarbecca said:No. They gave us the option either their flooring or no flooring.
MojoJD said:Polarbecca said:No. They gave us the option either their flooring or no flooring.
Are you sure about that? Did you actually go with "no flooring"? I was told otherwise, and if what you're saying is true, i have a few frantic calls to make to save some uninstall costs.
Shooby said:Is anyone else's exterior of their home in need of some TLC? The black gates that surround the front entry are no longer black as the sun has faded them to a light gray, there are cracks in the stucco in the rear of the home (almost a foot wide). The parking is getting worse by day...it seems as though the regulators are on vacation with our HOA dues?
MojoJD said:Its not a straight comparison, as Camden starts at 1553 square feet (plan 1), and the Ivy (woodbury east) top out at at 1500, for roughly the same price. Actually, the 350K plan you mentioned is only 1180 sq ft. In my opinion, the 2nd floor of the Camden plan 1 is very impressive and spacious by comparison.
Not a bad deal over there, though. Depends on preference. Their plan C isnt bad, to be honest. We'll see how a finished block turns out.
jbatzmaru said:MojoJD said:Its not a straight comparison, as Camden starts at 1553 square feet (plan 1), and the Ivy (woodbury east) top out at at 1500, for roughly the same price. Actually, the 350K plan you mentioned is only 1180 sq ft. In my opinion, the 2nd floor of the Camden plan 1 is very impressive and spacious by comparison.
Not a bad deal over there, though. Depends on preference. Their plan C isnt bad, to be honest. We'll see how a finished block turns out.
agree that the ivy is smaller but you get 3bedroom for 1300 sqft. for high 300K. that is a better value then a 2bedroom for 435k+ I am not too familiar with camden's price since I have not gone back there to check it out. Not to mention it is tustin vs irvine.
also.... this would put alot of pressure on the resale condo in irvine.... you can buy a new place for less then a older place. I wonder If IR will do a feature on this.