I know there are other threads on this but this one has a poll.
So I read this article the other day:
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/cook-714333-veterans-site.html
So as I read it, is this right?
1. Site A, the original site owned by the city, is closer to Irvine Blvd and will take 3 years or so to have it ready for the first internments.
2. Site B, owned by 5 Points, is closer to the 5 freeway and can be ready in a year.
3. The vets actually prefer B because it will be ready quicker although it will cost more.
4. GP homeowners prefer B because it's farther away from them.
Seems simple to me to swap... why is the city so against it? From the article, the only opposition I read is the fact they already spent money on feasibility studies but I'm sure they can raise money again for site B.
I know the other threads say it's some agenda by TIC or others but what agenda?