Gohabsgo_IHB
New member
Let's say that the general financial industry underestimated the housing downturn since mid 2005. In 2005, they said everything would be fine, in 2006 they said things might level off then pick up again, in late 2006 they said things will pick back up in 2007, in 2007 they said the same about 2008. Now in 2008 they said things will still be bad in 2009 (at least for the most part).
So if they have been wrong for 3 years (always being overly optimistic), why wouldn't they be overly optimistic again?
Even IR's projections are not as bad as things have been since 2007. I didn't check his "How bad things good get" post, but his best guess seem a little high now.
With the US and global economy going south as quickly as it is now I do not see any reasons why things wouldn't be so much worse than most bears are currently thinking.
I have been a bear for 2 years now and I thought Graphix and others were too pessimistic. I think I changed my mind and I am not even sure if they are pessimistic enough. Roubini and Schiller, two of the most widely known bears, are projecting very very bad things for the coming months. I now think they must be right.
Here's my little idea of why people didn't see things as they currently are. Computer models run sensitivity testing and scenario testing. Sensitivity measures the impact of a single event (e.g. interest rate on housing prices) whereas scenario testing measures the impact of a scenario (e.g. interest rate drop, economy tanks, and credit crisis all at the same time). Both analysis provide good feedback on how things might behave under various circumstances. However, the main problem is that scenario testing can't be accurate in the unknown. Such conditions have never been experienced before, therefore there's no scenario testing that can predict what might happen. It is sometime too hard for a model to account for all the external events that might occur at the same time, therefore it might not be able to model the most extreme/outlier outcomes (read: today's enrvironment).
Finally, I would add that markets overshoot fundamentals (up and down). The bigger the bubble, the more it explodes. Therefore, I wouldn't be surprised if home prices overshoot the fundamentals by a very big margin.
Yeah, I really think things will get worse, much much worse. It will be ugly.
So if they have been wrong for 3 years (always being overly optimistic), why wouldn't they be overly optimistic again?
Even IR's projections are not as bad as things have been since 2007. I didn't check his "How bad things good get" post, but his best guess seem a little high now.
With the US and global economy going south as quickly as it is now I do not see any reasons why things wouldn't be so much worse than most bears are currently thinking.
I have been a bear for 2 years now and I thought Graphix and others were too pessimistic. I think I changed my mind and I am not even sure if they are pessimistic enough. Roubini and Schiller, two of the most widely known bears, are projecting very very bad things for the coming months. I now think they must be right.
Here's my little idea of why people didn't see things as they currently are. Computer models run sensitivity testing and scenario testing. Sensitivity measures the impact of a single event (e.g. interest rate on housing prices) whereas scenario testing measures the impact of a scenario (e.g. interest rate drop, economy tanks, and credit crisis all at the same time). Both analysis provide good feedback on how things might behave under various circumstances. However, the main problem is that scenario testing can't be accurate in the unknown. Such conditions have never been experienced before, therefore there's no scenario testing that can predict what might happen. It is sometime too hard for a model to account for all the external events that might occur at the same time, therefore it might not be able to model the most extreme/outlier outcomes (read: today's enrvironment).
Finally, I would add that markets overshoot fundamentals (up and down). The bigger the bubble, the more it explodes. Therefore, I wouldn't be surprised if home prices overshoot the fundamentals by a very big margin.
Yeah, I really think things will get worse, much much worse. It will be ugly.