TimHume_IHB
New member
I want one of these BK houses. What he describes sounds perfect to me. YMMV.
bkshopr said:I just don't see driveway dominated communities become future classic gems and highly sought after. History has not shown that so far. Driveway dominated properties represent most of the foreclosure inventory currently.
acpme said:is it possible to roughly sketch? having a hard time visualizing... so this would be a narrow SFR product (i'm imagining something like cachette in woodbury), but with a detached garage in the rear. between the house and garage is the yard.
edit: excuse my rough sketch, but did i get it right?
socalhousingbubble said:bkshopr said:Keep in mind the only way in getting cost down is to utilize less land. What everyone wants is solution driving down density thus creating home prices that is out of reach.
BK-
Can't the land go down in value instead of using less of it?
SCHB
bkshopr said:Land will not go down in value regardless of how you use it. When you use less land you buy less land. Buy less therefore pay less but land value does not go down.
So you're saying that 10 acres of OC land in 2006 is now worth the same amount in 2009? Doubtful.bkshopr said:socalhousingbubble said:bkshopr said:Keep in mind the only way in getting cost down is to utilize less land. What everyone wants is solution driving down density thus creating home prices that is out of reach.
BK-
Can't the land go down in value instead of using less of it?
SCHB
Land will not go down in value regardless of how you use it. When you use less land you buy less land. Buy less therefore pay less but land value does not go down.
how many total spots per house in existing code? two + 0.75 of a guest spot?bkshopr said:Irvine guest parking code is 0.75 car per house. ...
The biggest issue of people wanting to park out on the street is the storage in garages that forces the cars out on the streets. With the 2.75 car garage that should alleviate the problem.
opuswon said:So you're saying that 10 acres of OC land in 2006 is now worth the same amount in 2009? Doubtful.bkshopr said:socalhousingbubble said:bkshopr said:Keep in mind the only way in getting cost down is to utilize less land. What everyone wants is solution driving down density thus creating home prices that is out of reach.
BK-
Can't the land go down in value instead of using less of it?
SCHB
Land will not go down in value regardless of how you use it. When you use less land you buy less land. Buy less therefore pay less but land value does not go down.
irvine_home_owner said:There are quite a few homes with the single driveway to the back garage in Orange and Santa Ana.
No_Such_Reality said:how many total spots per house in existing code? two + 0.75 of a guest spot?bkshopr said:Irvine guest parking code is 0.75 car per house. ...
The biggest issue of people wanting to park out on the street is the storage in garages that forces the cars out on the streets. With the 2.75 car garage that should alleviate the problem.
yes, non pack-rats park two cars in a two car garage and wedge their stuff around.
Pack-rats, the ones you're talking about, can barely get one car in a 3 car garage, and some don't even get any cars in their garage.
Irvine's parking requirements are completely inadequate when a neighborhood matures. For townhomes or condos, it's inadequate from day one.
Right or wrong, we are society that has moved to one car per adult with economically stable consumer households having a 'spare' car on top of that.
The average median income for IHB members is $220k. 3x220k =$660k.
You still haven't shown me how you save land usage with your plan. A detached garage in your configuration looks to take up just as much of or more land depth-wise... especially when you have to factor in the added need for alley/motorcourts.bkshopr said:20. Cost $200,000 less than a house with a 2 car driveway. (With a 3 car alley garage the disadvantage is the 4th car is parked in front of the house)
[...]
4. Costs $200k more due to inefficient land usage.
bkshopr said:9. No neighbors could view into private yard. The neighbor's house to the left of Acpme's sketch is a zero lot wall. View from right is blocked by mudroom and the space above the mudroom.
zovall said:bkshopr said:9. No neighbors could view into private yard. The neighbor's house to the left of Acpme's sketch is a zero lot wall. View from right is blocked by mudroom and the space above the mudroom.
bkshopr, How large would the private yard be? If it is too small, my concern is that it may get a little claustrophobic being in a small area enclosed by two stories...