irvineguy,
Of course no one here except her knows what actually happened (probably not herself either, as the other driver also has his own right to his lane), and she obviously thinks very low of the other guy, so I only want to comment on what she did or she is doing, using her own words. She is highly educated so I don't think she is incriminating herself, right?
Her own words, not mine.
"BUT this guy was tailing me for a mile and moved over to the far left lane so as I'm signaling and changing over 3 lanes to make my turn he already had a vengeance."
she was in the right most lane and changed over 3 lanes to be in front of him. I don't know about you but the left most lane usually is faster than the right most lane. When a slower vehicle moves 3 lanes to be in front of you, you'd have to hit the brakes pretty hard.
"And I didn't cut him off, I was just changing lanes fast to get to my turn"
So she admitted she changed 3 lanes FAST to get to her turn
"I had my signal on and it was obvious I was trying to get to the left turn lane. Plus prior to that he was tailgating me for a mile down culver so he had an agenda"
Again more like she was blocking then traffic and when the guy thought he got away from her, 3 lanes to the left, she cut him off in order to make her turn. if he had an agenda, he would not have moved THREE LANES left prior to she made a fast lane change
"I wish I had our gun in the car, I would not have hesitated in shooting at him"
So she would have shot that guy, guilty or not.
"And asshole if you're reading this right now my United States marine husband is on the lookout for your old ass with his gun"
Her response in a public forum is a man hunt threat.
She is definitely the aggressor here; I consider changing 3 lanes fast reckless driving and I consider threating to shoot somebody, whether he is guilty or not, whehther you are protected by the first or not, is very very wrong.
Lastly, I don't have anything personal against Paris. I just don't like polical over-correctness; the race card, the woman protecting her child card...etc.
She put her children in danger through reckless driving; in this case some guy who followed her but fortunately he is not the same NRA member as she. But in some cases she could've gotten run over by a 18 wheeler. No guarded gate or high priced Irvine real estate can save you if you want to make a last second multiple lane change and get run over.
It is for her own good to see the truth; the guy who follows her is secondary. her reckless driving is more an issue here
irvineguy said:
The California Court Company said:
Justsayin,
Where is your manhood?
If a woman almost hurt me with her reckless driving or threatens to shoot me with her gun or have my ass kicked by her US marine hubby, I would do more than just following her.
Cal-Court,
Would you stop this madness already? You don't know for sure if she was indeed driving reckless or that the other party almost got hurt, and what she said on this forum came long after he already followed her... You know nothing about the other driver, repeatedly reminded us that we've only heard one side of the story, yet you are so sure that it was Paris' fault... Where's the logic? I think it's evident that you have something against Paris personally, but let's at least try to be fair to the rest of the forum would you?