Strom said:Apparently just some brush in the Spyglass area - not sure if any houses were involved:
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/strong-2193139
BMP 309 said:Strom said:Apparently just some brush in the Spyglass area - not sure if any houses were involved:
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/strong-2193139
The last I saw: 2 homes had minor damage, and 100 acres burned. Now contained.
roundcorners said:I love some of the comments from readers of the OC Register article:
olddude wrote:
Oh gosh, a fire in Newport Beach! Isn't that where the rich people live? Better get down there asap! Spare nothing, the fire must be put out - 8 mile an hour "winds" - with gust even! Of course there is another fire raging, but, alas, that's in Los Angeles County and we all know about that place! (Does anyone ever wonder why the Orange County Register is becoming a thinner newspaper?)
elitistguy wrote:
The winds messed up my yard today and now I have to go pick up all the pine needles and clean my pool. Some of my hair was also blown out of place.
blackacre-seeker said:No need to get all worked up about this. I'm also not going to weep for some rich folks who have millions and often own several houses. It is unfortunate to have it happen to anyone nothwithstanding their financial situation, but there is a world of difference if a family loses their only large asset to fire, let's say a 400K condo, and a millionaire losing one of his 5M mansions. The millionaire can go stay at the Ritz, and the family without that kind of money is going to seek charity from relatives and stangers.
It is absurd to suggest that I should be all upset about threatened or actual fire damage to multimillion-dollar homes. Where did they get that kind of money anyway, flipping houses during the bubble? Underwriting bad mortgages? Cheating investors out of their money while collecting millions in bonuses?
blackacre-seeker said:No need to get all worked up about this. I'm also not going to weep for some rich folks who have millions and often own several houses. It is unfortunate to have it happen to anyone nothwithstanding their financial situation, but there is a world of difference if a family loses their only large asset to fire, let's say a 400K condo, and a millionaire losing one of his 5M mansions. The millionaire can go stay at the Ritz, and the family without that kind of money is going to seek charity from relatives and stangers.
It is absurd to suggest that I should be all upset about threatened or actual fire damage to multimillion-dollar homes. Where did they get that kind of money anyway, flipping houses during the bubble? Underwriting bad mortgages? Cheating investors out of their money while collecting millions in bonuses?
blackacre-seeker said:Yet, I'm not going to feel sorry for millionaires losing one of their mansions.
And just one more time: if you have one home and it burns down, I feel sorry for you 100%. If you have a few homes, and one burns down, I feel 1/5 times less sorry (or whatever the number of homes you have). Also, how you got the money to buy this nice home would also make a difference to me. I just don't get why is this so difficult to understand.I guess everybody missed my point: I’m not cheering for fires, that should not happen to anyone. Yet, I’m not going to feel sorry for millionaires losing one of their mansions. As to they posters who provided a background on people whose homes suffered some fire damage, my thoughts are with them.