NYT: Study of Elite College Admissions Data Suggests Being Very Rich Is Its Own Qualification

iacrenter

Well-known member

I thought this article was interesting given the other thread about IUSD and getting into Ivies. Being in the 1% has its advantages: legacy admissions, sports, and private schools.

Some interesting quotes:

"Children from middle- and upper-middle-class families — including those at public high schools in high-income neighborhoods — applied in large numbers. But they were, on an individual basis, less likely to be admitted than the richest or, to a lesser extent, poorest students with the same test scores. In that sense, the data confirms the feeling among many merely affluent parents that getting their children into elite colleges is increasingly difficult."

"The biggest contributor was that admissions committees gave higher scores to students from private, nonreligious high schools. They were twice as likely to be admitted as similar students — those with the same SAT scores, race, gender and parental income — from public schools in high-income neighborhoods. A major factor was recommendations from guidance counselors and teachers at private high schools."

So if it's Ivy or bust--better off dumping your Irvine home and use funds for a good private school.
 
All that article is saying is that, all things being equal, private high schools trump public high schools. Given that most of the elite universities are private, it makes sense for their committees to give advantage to private high schools.
 
Back
Top