[quote author="FairEconomist" date=1251843816][quote author="autox" date=1251841129]Thanks for the reply. I'm wondering if the increase number of people with bad credit will blunt some of the affects of bad credit. In the past, there were huge stigmas with having bad credit, foreclosure, or bankruptcy in your history, but now, it seems almost prudent. With more people having bad credit, land lords/insurance/utility companies will feel the pressure to relax some of their standards.</blockquote>
More specifically, as "bad credit" comes to include large numbers of people who are responsible with credit except in the extraordinary circumstance of being hundreds of thousands underwater on a house, the risk in making loans to people with "bad credit" will drop and so will the difficulty and fees. If the credit companies don't adjust ratings for this special circumstance, it will improve access to credit for truly bad borrowers and cause some nasty losses down the line for them. If they do start to adjust, "good credit except for a bubble foreclosure" will probably end up a pretty ordinary category. I'll bet there's a real opportunity offering credit cards for people in this circumstance trying to rebuild their credit.</blockquote>
Personally, I wouldn't want to give out credit to somebody with a foreclosure, no matter what the circumstances. They either bought more house than they could afford with some of exotic loan (bad credit risk), lost their job and weren't able to get another quickly (bad credit risk), or broke the contract they signed merely because their house was underwater (bad credit risk).