irvinehomeowner
Well-known member
So we've seen the floorplans, some of you have seen the lots and the area... and we know there are no Mello Roos... so what do you think Lambert Ranch should price their homes at (and we know they are watching this thread)?
Los Colinas ranges from $323-$333/sft and their smallest home starts at 2988 sft. So if I add premium for gated, farther away from toll road and no MRs, we are probably looking at $350/sft for their smallest home. Usually you scale down the $/sft as the square footage increases but based on Laguna Altura, it looks like they actually charge more for the bigger homes so I'll keep the scale the same (but include a lower one for reference).
The Field: 2,730 ? 3,081sft
$350/sft = starts at $950k
The Hill: 3,418 ? 3,792sft
$350/sft = starts at $1.2m
$335/sft = starts at $1.15m
The Grove: 4,273 to 4,573sft
$350/sft = starts at $1.5m
$320/sft = starts at $1.37m
This is comparable (and maybe a bit cheaper) to Maricopa in Stonegate, San Marino in Woodbury and Cortona/Toscana in Laguna Altura. The larger models could cost more because you simply can't buy a new 4000+sft house in Irvine elsewhere.
I think one problem is the overlap/variation in prices from tract to tract... so they may not be able to discount too much for each step in tract. If the largest Field home price is close enough to the smallest Hill home, you'll find the Field Plan 3s won't sell as well as the Hill's Plan 1s. So the difference in prices might actually be larger.
Now, where do I think they should start if they want to sell these quick and blow the TIC homes away in sales pace? Maybe a 5% decrease? That would put the starting prices at $900k, $1.14m, $1.33m. Or a 10% decrease? $855k, $1.08m, $1.26m (close to option 1)?
Or maybe The New Home Company is going completely the other way and charging $375-$400/sft (indicated by option 3)?
When you answer the poll, please remember there is a difference in what we think they will be... and what we hope they would be.
Los Colinas ranges from $323-$333/sft and their smallest home starts at 2988 sft. So if I add premium for gated, farther away from toll road and no MRs, we are probably looking at $350/sft for their smallest home. Usually you scale down the $/sft as the square footage increases but based on Laguna Altura, it looks like they actually charge more for the bigger homes so I'll keep the scale the same (but include a lower one for reference).
The Field: 2,730 ? 3,081sft
$350/sft = starts at $950k
The Hill: 3,418 ? 3,792sft
$350/sft = starts at $1.2m
$335/sft = starts at $1.15m
The Grove: 4,273 to 4,573sft
$350/sft = starts at $1.5m
$320/sft = starts at $1.37m
This is comparable (and maybe a bit cheaper) to Maricopa in Stonegate, San Marino in Woodbury and Cortona/Toscana in Laguna Altura. The larger models could cost more because you simply can't buy a new 4000+sft house in Irvine elsewhere.
I think one problem is the overlap/variation in prices from tract to tract... so they may not be able to discount too much for each step in tract. If the largest Field home price is close enough to the smallest Hill home, you'll find the Field Plan 3s won't sell as well as the Hill's Plan 1s. So the difference in prices might actually be larger.
Now, where do I think they should start if they want to sell these quick and blow the TIC homes away in sales pace? Maybe a 5% decrease? That would put the starting prices at $900k, $1.14m, $1.33m. Or a 10% decrease? $855k, $1.08m, $1.26m (close to option 1)?
Or maybe The New Home Company is going completely the other way and charging $375-$400/sft (indicated by option 3)?
When you answer the poll, please remember there is a difference in what we think they will be... and what we hope they would be.
