LA Mormon Temple Closed After Suspicious Envelope Arrives in Mail

NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
I think it's equally likely for a Mormon church member to have to done to make themselves seem persecuted as it is for random crank or No on 8 supporter to have done it.
 
Uhh have you ever talked to a person who left the Mormon Church? Especially one who was a fairly wealthy supporter? It might be a bit of an eye opener. My mother in law was an ex member and when she married the man she loved (for 36 years) they shunned her, slit her tires, would go around to her jobs and slander her and just made her life hell until she moved away. One of them even came to her house (many, MANY years later...) and FORCED his way into the house quoting from the book of mormon. I was about 1/2 a second from pummeling this idiot with a bean bag load from the shotgun. Thankfully he left when the DOGS came out from the back....

You make up your own mind... at least that right hasn't been taken away.

-bix
 
No_Such_Reality said:
I think it's equally likely for a Mormon church member to have to done to make themselves seem persecuted as it is for random crank or No on 8 supporter to have done it.

Why would you say it's equally likely for a Mormon to send it as a Prop 8 supporter?

It seems that you are either misjudging human psychology, or basic probability.
 
No_Such_Reality said:
For the same reason that I watched the up roar over the hate crime in Claremont only to have it come out that the psychology professor is the one that did it to herself. Or any of the many other hate crime hoaxes. Which, is a real crime in my opinion and unfortunately, minimizes the real hate crimes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerri_Dunn

So, do you think that this radio station mailed a threat to itself to garner sympathy too?
 
WINEX said:
No_Such_Reality said:
For the same reason that I watched the up roar over the hate crime in Claremont only to have it come out that the psychology professor is the one that did it to herself. Or any of the many other hate crime hoaxes. Which, is a real crime in my opinion and unfortunately, minimizes the real hate crimes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerri_Dunn

So, do you think that this radio station mailed a threat to itself to garner sympathy too?

Corporate entities don't have as much to gain as deviant religious groups playing the persecution card.
 
No_Such_Reality said:
WINEX said:
No_Such_Reality said:
For the same reason that I watched the up roar over the hate crime in Claremont only to have it come out that the psychology professor is the one that did it to herself. Or any of the many other hate crime hoaxes. Which, is a real crime in my opinion and unfortunately, minimizes the real hate crimes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerri_Dunn

So, do you think that this radio station mailed a threat to itself to garner sympathy too?

Corporate entities don't have as much to gain as deviant religious groups playing the persecution card.

So you acknowledge that deviant opponents of Proposition 8 committed this terrorist act?
 
WINEX said:
No_Such_Reality said:
WINEX said:
No_Such_Reality said:
For the same reason that I watched the up roar over the hate crime in Claremont only to have it come out that the psychology professor is the one that did it to herself. Or any of the many other hate crime hoaxes. Which, is a real crime in my opinion and unfortunately, minimizes the real hate crimes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerri_Dunn

So, do you think that this radio station mailed a threat to itself to garner sympathy too?

Corporate entities don't have as much to gain as deviant religious groups playing the persecution card.

So you acknowledge that deviant opponents of Proposition 8 committed this terrorist act?

Are you admitting you did it to garner sympathy for the Pro 8 crowd?
 
No_Such_Reality said:
WINEX said:
No_Such_Reality said:
WINEX said:
No_Such_Reality said:
For the same reason that I watched the up roar over the hate crime in Claremont only to have it come out that the psychology professor is the one that did it to herself. Or any of the many other hate crime hoaxes. Which, is a real crime in my opinion and unfortunately, minimizes the real hate crimes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerri_Dunn

So, do you think that this radio station mailed a threat to itself to garner sympathy too?

Corporate entities don't have as much to gain as deviant religious groups playing the persecution card.

So you acknowledge that deviant opponents of Proposition 8 committed this terrorist act?

Are you admitting you did it to garner sympathy for the Pro 8 crowd?

My, what a stupid thing to say...
 
No, stupid is all the stuff you've posted for the last three months.

It's sad you cannot understand the basics behind hoaxes.

Since you choose to pretend to be completely daft, let me spell it out for you.

The church is the one with the most to gain from this event occuring.
 
No_Such_Reality said:
No, stupid is all the stuff you've posted for the last three months.

It's sad you cannot understand the basics behind hoaxes.

Since you choose to pretend to be completely daft, let me spell it out for you.

The church is the one with the most to gain from this event occuring.

Wait... so is WINEX a hoax or not? I thought he was...
 
No_Such_Reality said:
No, stupid is all the stuff you've posted for the last three months.

It's sad you cannot understand the basics behind hoaxes.

Since you choose to pretend to be completely daft, let me spell it out for you.

The church is the one with the most to gain from this event occuring.

This is really saying a lot, but you are actually dumber than I thought you were.
 
Yes, it does say a lot. You grasp at straws and imply that the letter is representative of core Prop 8 opponents. It isn't.

The simple fact is the letter is likely from a crank using the prop 8 debate as an excuse. The 2nd most likely, is a Church supporter trying to garner sympathy.

And let me spell out what I'm saying a lot about.

Just how little I think of your opinion. You see how idiotic the same non sequiturs are when lobbed back at you.
 
No_Such_Reality said:
Yes, it does say a lot. You grasp at straws and imply that the letter is representative of core Prop 8 opponents. It isn't.

The simple fact is the letter is likely from a crank using the prop 8 debate as an excuse. The 2nd most likely, is a Church supporter trying to garner sympathy.

And let me spell out what I'm saying a lot about.

Just how little I think of your opinion. You see how idiotic the same non sequiturs are when lobbed back at you.

LOL!

Most rational people would think that claiming the church is attacking itself and radio stations for sympathy is grasping at straws.

And any intelligent person would realize that the people of California have spoken twice within the past 10 years and clearly said that they don't support the moral decay of society that would be ushered in through recognizing gay marriage.

I guess your viewpoint proves that you are neither rational nor intelligent.
 
Back
Top