Irvine man claims in suit that his Tesla unexpectedly accelerated, crashed into his home
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/tesla-740040-lawsuit-car.html
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/tesla-740040-lawsuit-car.html
BangBros said:so where is this? What street.
irvinehomeowner said:Wasn't the other incident like this that happened in Northwood Town Center deemed driver error?
The article also says that Tesla blackbox determined it was "driver pressing on accelerator 100%".
Soylent Green Is People said:Electric car acceleration is sudden and does not have an accompanying engine rev. If you're confused as to which pedal your foot is on, my guess is that it's very easy to think you've pushed the brake to 100 percent and not the other pedal.
IrvineOH02 said:I am kind of skeptical about the driver pressing on accelerator 100%. Who in the correct mind will press 100% on the accelerator with their two sons in the car with wall infront? If this was intentional to make quick $ or by mistake, I am assuming it would be pressed <100% so your family won't die from it. 100% means, it was likely a computer glitch. Also, how do you determine if it was the software that pressed the accelerator vs. human foot that pressed it? I don't think the software log recognizes the difference other than the accelerator was initiated.
Also, the sudden acceleration complaint rate for Tesla X is about 10x that of Toyota incident where they settled for $1.2 billion. Why such a significant exponential rate than other cars? Hmm.. I am waiting for my Tesla III and I might wait until the dust settles.
Emissions discrepancies vs faulty acceleration are apples and oranges.BangBros said:Remember, the Students who proved the VW emissions scandal were able to completely duplicate the cheating scenario over and over consistently. So unless someone can consistently prove and demonstrate the unintended acceleration repeatedly , then Tesla will never admit fault.